this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
185 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
6057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
185
Price Per Square Inch for TVs by size (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by mahin@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is mostly useless, except to justify buying a bigger TV. However, I did learn:

  • For most popular high end models, the 65 inch models are cheapest / sq inch (e.g Sony A95L, Samsung S90D, LG G4). For most others, it's the 75 inch models.
  • TCL S551F 55" scores the lowest ($0.17/sq inch)
  • The lowest scoring OLED is the Samsung S85D ($0.55/sq inch)
  • For 100 inches, Hisense QD7 is the cheapest ($0.37/sq inch). For 85 inches, it's the TCL S551F ($0.22/sq inch)

Graphs by brand

Prices taken from Amazon, rest of the data from https://comparetvprices.com/. Models are from 2022-now.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If screens were only about size, I'd be easy.

[–] qisope@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd be easy

an unexpected correlation

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, I stand by it.

[–] UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Righteous!

[–] tocano@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you hard?! We're talking about TV sizes, right?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

... Yeah ofc, right. Right?

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless they're priced by if they have built in ads or not, it's useless.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

does anyone use their native smart TV UI anyway?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Outside sarcastic internet forums? Probably, yeah.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

LG and Samsung have been caught uploading screenshots of your HDMI inputs too, so it's not like it's any better

[–] HejMedDig@feddit.dk 7 points 2 weeks ago

As long as the TV doesn't have internet access, it can't do much with it

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

which you can opt out from and/or just not put your TV on a network.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Most people do.

Mine's just old enough to not have ads but new enough to have apps for plex and other services I use. Next one is going to be disconnected and have some flashable Android box connected to it. Or even just Apple TV as that's still better than most native UIs.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I do.

I use the Jellyfin and Netflix apps mostly.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't, I'm not sure if I'm in the minority. I just plug in my laptop or cast my phone (jellyfin or any other misc streaming service).

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I want a 3 axis chart of price, size, and number of ads in the UI.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt this will hold up now that they're owned by Walmart, but I've gotten exactly zero ads on Vizio panels since I first bought one in 2017. I have two at the moment and they're both effectively dumb displays with no network access.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Now filter by display technology.

[–] mahin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Display technologies are a bit confusing, but this should give you a general idea: https://imgur.com/a/PhTFNZ2

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the type of HDR they support. I got lucky finding a philips a couple years ago that just supports all types so I don't have to worry about it.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Mine supports none, so I also don't have to worry about it.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago

What about the nits man

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could also move the TV closer to the sofa.

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How many square inches does that get me?

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You bastard, You made me try calculating it!

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There's not much point in optimizing completely for price per inch, but when I bought my TV in 2013 I plotted this, and discovered a pretty sharp hockey stick in the graph at 70" and above. So I got a 65" TV. If my graph had looked pretty straight like yours I'd probably just get the biggest that is practical for the space.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yeah you'd have to get a rear projection DLP to get a bargain at that screen size back then. around 2010 i picked up a 73" DLP for less than a grand at costco, but i used some lucky discounts, or it would've been 1100 or so on sale.

most people don’t like those bulky TVs though, even back then. or even have room for them.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My SO wants a bigger screen, and I was thinking of a 65", but maybe I'll consider a 75" instead since it seems like a sweet spot for value.

I've also debated getting a projector. It's in a basement, so I can get a blackout curtain for daytime use.

[–] mahin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Same thing for 100 inch models now. Maybe it'll flatten out in a few years.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I followed a roughly similar process but the flow was more like, "Here's a 65-inch TV on sale, let's bump up our 48."

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

At least in the case of the Hisense TV I got for my grandparents, a "glitch" with accessibility controls (makes directional inputs unresponsive or multi-press at times) just so happens to make remapping the sponsored remote buttons impossible, as well as breaking the most common method of changing the system launcher, so screen size alone isn't everything.

Although Hisense still tries to reinstall sponsored apps after I delete them, using Launcher Manager to set a custom launcher that allows for the hiding of unwanted applications and channels made it much more usable for my grandparents.

Unfortunately I wasn't able to redirect YouTube voice input commands to SmartTube Next, so if I ever replace it, that'll be a factor in my decision too.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Here, it's not demand vs. suply. It's demand only, that drives the prices.

Wait, isn't that a sign for collusion?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing to see here, just capitalism working as intended...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently 75" is the sweet spot right now.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Informative post, thanks. I think a boxplot would have worked better here.