468
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 175 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What’s with the media’s obsession with the opinions of known trolls like Matt Walsh?! Fuck, stop highlighting his drivel and that of people like him. You’re giving them free advertising!

Maga melting down over a black performer isn’t news. It’s olds!

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 49 points 2 years ago

Welcome to seeing the white supremacist hegemony. They'll platform racists criticizing Black Art forms, but they'll actively avoid giving any room for those Black Art forms. You see it everywhere in what artists get radio promotion and algorithmic boosts vs who toils in the underground for years, or else releases a couple EPs, a couple of mixtapes, and then goes into a boring graphic design job because shit, they need food man.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 121 points 2 years ago

Kendrick killed it, who gives a shit what haters think.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 114 points 2 years ago

Kendrick dropping truth bombs on the NFL’s biggest stage? Cue the MAGAverse hyperventilating into their flag-print fainting couches. Nothing terrifies fragile hegemony more than Black artistry that isn’t sanitized for their comfort. Oh no—a Pulitzer-winning rapper dared weave politics into the sacred ad-break circus! Next they’ll demand halftime shows be replaced with Lee Greenwood AI covers.

The meltdown’s a feature, not a bug. Conservatives need perpetual outrage to mask their cultural irrelevance. Imagine stanning a draft-dodging conman but seething when an actual poet weaponizes the mic. Stay mad—the future’s rhyming without you.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 92 points 2 years ago

Right-wing commentators Eric Daugherty and Benny Johnson took their criticism to the extreme, describing the performance as “Black nationalist" and calling Lamar a “mumbling pagan Satanic cultist”.

This would only make me want to see it if I hadn’t already lol

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

And Kendrick Lamar is famously Christian and makes references to God frequently in his lyrics. Although, I doubt they consider the black church “Christian” since prosperity gospel megachurch bullshit strays so far from Christ that they probably can’t recognize an actual Christian any better than they can recognize a fire beat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Can you even be both pagan and Satanic?

"He's a mumbling pagan, Satanic, Jewish, Mexican, Socialist, Antifa, Chinese..." Beyond all the social abuses, I hate MAGA and right-wing pundits because they've robbed words of meaning, on a scale that forces adjustment unlike anything else.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] gamer@lemm.ee 91 points 2 years ago

Why would the pedophile Matt Gaetz be offended by a song dissing pedophiles?

But also fuck this type of partisan rage bait article. This type of writing is what divides us, even if it's saying things you wanna hear.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Im 50 and white. A lot of the people I know who hated the halftime show aren’t hip-hop fans and/or have trouble interpreting dance performances. The racist people I know just didn’t watch it at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Blade9732@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago

I thought Kendrick was very good, and I don't listen to him or very much of that style music. He is amazingly talented and I thought a top tier showman. In the article, Jack Posobic said that he wished it was Creed (like In the 2001 half time) instead. Since this was the Apple Music streaming halftime show, I looked it up. #1 Streamer of last year was Kendrick, I didn't see Creed in the top 50. Also Billboard has Kendrick at #4 all year for Streaming, also no Creed. I know Creed had a big resurgence last year touring, but I was around listing to music in 2001 and we all voted that Creed sucks. I didn't like those people who liked Creed then, and even more so now.

[-] IonAddis@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

but I was around listing to music in 2001 and we all voted that Creed sucks

Can confirm, was also listening to music in 2001, and Creed sucks

Given current events though, I wonder if Disturbed and System of a Down will be moved to make something new.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

I was in my late 20s back then. Anyone who told me they were into Creed during that time always ended up being the guy the women around would all have a story about regarding abusive behavior.

[-] JoshDoctsonFadeRoute@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

John Dolmayan from SOAD is actually a huge Trump supporter for some reason.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://blabbermouth.net/news/system-of-a-down-drummer-claims-he-lost-hundreds-of-thousands-of-fans-who-couldnt-handle-his-opinions

SYSTEM OF A DOWN drummer John Dolmayan, who has publicly voiced his support for former U.S. president Donald Trump on a number of occasions, claims that he has lost "friends" and "hundreds of thousands of fans" due to his opinions.

load more comments (1 replies)

I remember when creed came out, it gave rise to a shitload of bands with lead singers that would go out of their way to sound like Scott Stapp. If you hated creed, this became very obvious and annoying

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 75 points 2 years ago

The opening was propaganda and the ads were propaganda. What do they have to complain about?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago

I’m just mad he didn’t say the word “pedophile”

[-] breadcat@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago

can't say that on tv!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

I assumed it was because of the lawsuit that is already pending. I don’t think “pedophile” is a censored word

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Honestly, I thought the nod early in the performance was all we were gonna get. I didn't think he was going to do ANY of that specific song. The fact the only thing censored was the word pedophile just makes more people that don't know what's up want to look it up.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

It definitely wasn’t the only censored word. Kendrick skipped more than a few words overall. But it was far and away the most obvious one

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 years ago

Shocking that MAGA wouldn't like someone who disses pedophiles.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 42 points 2 years ago

So sick of these clickbait headlines. From the headline to the body "Melts down" -> "wasn't too impressed". BORING. Journalists need to do some actual work like they used to instead of just farming rage bait.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well of course.

  1. The host and musical guests were black.
  2. Kendrick calls out pedophiles.

They can't have either of those obviously.

[-] fourexample@lemm.ee 33 points 2 years ago

Annoying generalization and useless Internet noise what even is journalism

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago
[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Bitches can stay mad.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 24 points 2 years ago

"Melts down", like when a nuclear reactor goes critical, isn't the apt descriptor for this response.

It was more like, "Maga generally disliked or was otherwise uninterested in the super bowl halftime performance".

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

If all MAGAts just spontaneously died that would be fucking boffo.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
468 points (92.7% liked)

politics

31069 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS