this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
641 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
5138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It isn’t racist enough, so he has to take over and train it on nazi propaganda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

I wonder why his offer wasn't 69.420 billion?

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

This is corporate trolling. Open AI is trying to go public soon, and Elon did this to fuck with that.

Massive oversimplification but basically: In the United States, you are required to take the best offer when selling a company, unless you can argue in court that you had reasons not to sell to whomever placed the highest bid. Because of this offer, as open AI attempts to go public, they will have to either to be close to Elon's bid, forced to sell to him, go to court and fight him ther, or be forced to remain private.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

I feel like "look at twitter" is probably enough of a defence to decline president musk.
It would probably need to be wordier for court proceedings.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But they aren’t required to sell though.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes, they could remain private but they are attempting to go public. This action is a legal speedbump that they must now work really hard to maneuver around.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao, musk is on record as making absurd offers and then trying everything he can to back out of them. I'm not sure why he offered this himself instead of getting a consortium of investors together to do so on his behalf without any involvement from him.

[–] rigamarole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Isn't this what he did with Twitter and the courts forced him to honor the offer?

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He bought Twitter for 44 billion... and the US presidency for 290 million.

That is the single most dystopian shit I have ever heard. The idea that people and countries are so dirt cheap and companies are orders of magnitude more valuable is a thing that should damn their souls to hell.

You how bad this is affecting me? I've been an atheist and anti-death penality most of my life... Musk has for the past while made me think that the death penalty needs to be applied to people like him (and Israeli war criminals) and not to common crooks and common murderers. He is even making me want a hell to exist so people like him can burn in it.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

and the US presidency for 290 million.

So, about a dollar per American.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

That’s on par with the fundraising goal for my kid’s elementary school. About a dollar per person in the district.

Totally different situation though, since these suckers at the school are going to spend it on a bunch of kids who haven’t even labored in the mines for it.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone should've chipped in with a dollar and you'd have your own country! /s

But that's socialism.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

I wonder if that'd work. Do a crowdfunding for certain legislation, and pay it out to whoever votes for it (with a bonus for whoever first proposes the legislation). Dystopian as fuck, but perhaps worth an experiment.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Less. Our population is something like 330m now I think.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He can afford to pay twice the price of Twitter because he's using government money. Remember he barely swung the 44 billion for Twitter. Now he's buying something for more than double that? After putting code into the Treasury department computers to hide transactions?

Lmao.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Pretty sure he's now functionally the worlds richest man (including oligarchs with a lot of hidden wealth) what with his newly aquired un-supervised access to 6 trillion in US government funds.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yep, seems legit, eh? 🤣

[–] lovelywon@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He offered to buy it with someone else's money and take the credit

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I’ve never understood how you can take out a loan to buy a company, turn around and place all that debt on the company you just bought, and have no personal ramifications when the company goes belly up because the debt load is too high.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

even if openai are assholes, chatgpt is still useful for things as long as you dont put too much trust in it. If that fucker buys it they will turn it into racist shitspewing garbage. Without it, regular people will have no decent or easy way to utilize ai and this new tech will benefit only the rich who will use it to oppress us even worse.

Stinky isnt an idiot, i wish he was. Anything he buys he can and will use to cause harm to us. So this would be bad for us all.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

chatgpt is still useful for things as long as you dont put too much trust in it.

Yep, its very useful for generating buzzword salad, so I use it for cover letters for job postings.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Pretty much what I use my locally hosted LLM for. Might not be as good as ChatGPT but I don't really care.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Regular users can use Gemini, Deepseek, Meta AI, and there will probably be many more services in the future.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Deepseek took the training of foundation models from a billionaire's game to a millionaire's game. If Elon wants an AI monopoly, it'll have to be done through litigation. Which, ya know, they're also trying.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

How to become a millionaire: Start with 97.4 Billion.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

YES!

Finally a way to destroy the AI hype.

Maybe the man is good for something besides wasting oxygen after all.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Destroy it?

Like he destroyed Twitter by turning it into his personal propaganda outlet, maybe.

It sounds to me like he's just positioning himself to control an AI tech provider who will conveniently be contracted to replace all the government positions he is trying to eliminate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is he going to buy a “founder” clause in the contract?

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Well this time he actually is one of the founders. He invested 45 million to launch OpenAI and he was co-chair with Altman

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theopriestley/2015/12/11/elon-musk-and-peter-thiel-launch-openai-a-non-profit-artificial-intelligence-research-company/

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 102 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Elon’s $97.4B hostile takeover bid for OpenAI is less about “safety” and more about a billionaire’s corporate tantrum. The offer reeks of desperation—a laughable lowball for a company valued at $340B, dressed as altruism.

Altman’s clapback—“buy Twitter for $9.74B”—is the perfect middle finger to Musk’s flailing empire. Remember when X became a $44B dumpster fire? Now he wants to drag OpenAI into his orbit of mismanaged toys.

This feud isn’t about AI ethics—it’s two tech oligarchs weaponizing legal battles and PR stunts. Musk’s “open-source” crusade is safety theater while his own xAI hoards code. The only winner here? Lawyers billing hourly as the world burns.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Canigou@jlai.lu 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Where is the "hide Musk/DOGE/Trump related posts" button ?

EDIT : Found it ! (Damn, Lemmy is awesome 😊)

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't see this option sadly, only block instance/community/user. Would love to block Trump/Musks fucking faces from my life.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Bro, I think you just wiped out your entire front page.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 196 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

not even one-third of the valuation openai thinks they're worth (up to 340b). and still below what investors thought in 2022 (157b). src

i think this is old spice admitting that xAI is total bullshit and he's giving up on making his own.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] transitinoir@slrpnk.net 172 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Genius mastermind shadow president plan:

  1. Buy company A for shit ton of money
  2. Ruin company A so it is worth 80% less
  3. Still have shit ton of money
  4. Repeat with company B
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In order to ruin it like Twitter?

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This kind of thing is why it's short-sighted even for the other tech guys to cozy up to Trump. There's no room for anyone other than Musk and he is just going to use his leverage with Trump to screw over the other billionaires as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›