this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

44903 readers
978 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The label 'homo sapiens' for our species.

[โ€“] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

When the moon is at its farthest orbit from earth, all of the planets in the solar system can fit in between earth and the moon.

[โ€“] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Infinity and Black Hole

[โ€“] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That time passes differently in galaxies with different gravities. One of these galaxies is Mormon heaven.

[โ€“] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Gravitational time dilation is an effect of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Places with stronger gravity would then have time pass more slowly compared to earth. The opposite is also true.

[โ€“] Dr_Vindaloo@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] bradboimler@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

For the sake of discussion, let's say on the one hand a magic man intelligently designed life and all that. And on the other hand we have it arise and evolve over the course of billions of years of random atomic interactions and genetic mutations. I honestly find the second one far more amazing, wondrous, amazing, and mind blowing.

[โ€“] lime@feddit.nu 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

the implication of einsteins mass-energy equivalence formula is mind-blowing to me. one gram of mass, if perfectly converted to energy, makes 25 GWh. that means half the powerplants in my country could be replaced with this theoretical "mass converter" going through a gram of fuel an hour. that's under 10 kilograms of fuel a year.

a coal plant goes through tons of fuel a day.

energy researchers, get on it

[โ€“] Fluke@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

What do you think fusion research is?

[โ€“] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 4 hours ago

a fun fact: for the most efficient mass energy conversion, you need a huge spin black hole (preferably naked). Then you can get about 42% conversion. (there was a minute physics video about it i think)

[โ€“] absGeekNZ 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No where near perfect mass conversion....

Max theoretical mass-energy conversion efficiency is under 1%

[โ€“] teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

that's still waaayyyy more efficient than coal

[โ€“] absGeekNZ 1 points 6 minutes ago

That is a different level entirely.

The mass-energy conversion from chemical processes is extremely small compared to nuclear processes, you can't really compare the in any meaningful way

[โ€“] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 6 hours ago

15 years away from a useful result

[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just a fancier way to spin turbines with steam

Fancier or more efficient?

[โ€“] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 4 hours ago
[โ€“] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The fact that there is no discernable difference between an alive body or a dead body when it comes to chemical makeup.

All the pieces are there. All the atoms and molecules are still in the same places. Yet despite this the body is still dead.

[โ€“] LouNeko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

To be fair, a perfectly fine but dead body is impossible to observe since the process of dying is usually the result or accumulation of injuries or disfunctions. For this experiment you either have to kill somebody without altering their body in the slightest or instantly conjure a perfectly intact body without any life in it.

[โ€“] teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

yes, the same atoms are still there, but all the chemical processes in our body have stopped.

[โ€“] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 hours ago

When you say "All the atoms and molecules are still in the same places", I can't say I agree. It is the change of chemical composition that renders our body dead. Or should I say, death is defined to be such a chemical composition.

[โ€“] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

The size of the universe and the distance between everything in it. It takes about 8 minutes for light from our own sun to reach us. And the observable universe is about 5,859,000,000,000,000,000 times larger than that! That is quite a trip. I would need about 293,283,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 charging stops with my electric car to get to the end. I think Iโ€™ll pass.

(Someone smarter than me will probably find out that my math is wrong)

[โ€“] Kacarott@aussie.zone 9 points 10 hours ago

What I find mind blowing about the scale of the universe, is that on a logarithmic scale from the smallest possible thing to the largest possible thing, humans live at almost the exact centre.

[โ€“] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 day ago (5 children)

There are more hydrogen atoms in a molecule of water than there are stars in the solar system

Not just that, it's twice the amount!

[โ€“] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] spittingimage@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The fact that planes are kept in the air by the shape of their wings, which forces air to go over at a pace when it can't push down on the wing as hard as it can push up from underneath. It's like discovering an exploitable glitch in a videogame and every time I fly I worry that the universe will get patched while I'm at 10,000 feet.

[โ€“] flubba86@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I remember reading a couple years ago that's not actually how plane wings work. The actual way is much more complicated and hard to explain and hard to teach, so they just teach it this way because its an intuitive mental model that is "close enough" and "seems right", and it really doesn't matter unless you're a plane wing designer.

[โ€“] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The basic way an airplane works actually is simple and intuitive: it meets the air at an angle and deflects it downward. The equal and opposite reaction to accelerating that mass of air is an upward force on the wing.

There is, of course a whole lot of finesse on top of that with differences in wing design having huge impacts on the performance and handling of aircraft due to various aerodynamic phenomena which are anything but simple or intuitive. A thin, flat wing will fly though, and balsa wood toy airplanes usually use exactly that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)#Simplified_physical_explanations_of_lift_on_an_airfoil

[โ€“] Fluke@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

"With a big enough engine you can make a barn door fly."

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] Thorry84@feddit.nl 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A Planck length is the smallest length possible, a smaller length simply can't exist.

At least that's what scientists believed until they studied OPs penis, then they found out something smaller does in fact exist.

[โ€“] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

You can observe the chirality of some molecules from the crystals they form, sometimes they twist clockwise, other times they twist counter clockwise. Which way they twist is dependent on their molecular structure.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ