this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

World News

40574 readers
2081 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “unrealistic,” signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward negotiated settlements.

Speaking at NATO headquarters, he argued that pursuing full territorial recovery would prolong the war and emphasized the need for security guarantees without NATO membership or U.S. troops in Ukraine.

Hegseth outlined Trump’s approach of reducing Russian war funding through increased U.S. energy production while shifting more military support responsibility to Europe.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 46 seconds ago

Trump is all about shifting defense responsibility onto Europe but isn’t it the cas that the US proactively claimed responsibility for defense of virtually every sphere where it has interests? We have the largest military in the world by FAR and bases everywhere, and have allowed others to spend less on defense because we want to be the ones with the big stick. It’s a little ironic for Trump to complain that everyone has allowed us to pursue this policy we have been driving for decades.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

I'm surprised he can say anything with Putin's dick that far down his throat.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 3 hours ago

~~Pete Hegseth~~ Putin tells NATO...

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 hours ago

Damn the US sure seems impotent and weak these days if they can't even restore boundaries from just ten years ago.

[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 49 points 5 hours ago

"Putin's puppet administration says NATO should cede everything to Putin, news at 11."

[–] krebssteven@infosec.pub 22 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

The problem is - while he might not be wrong, simply because it’s unlikely that Russia would accept a total territorial loss at the negotiation table - ceding anything to the Russian imperialists is an invitation to keep pushing.

The truth is that the US of course do not care about the Ukraine as a sovereign entity. They care only about maintaining their own geopolitical interests.

On the other hand do I doubt that Russia is interested in merely maintaining their territorial gains - maybe as a special zone of some sort - if that would mean that the Ukraine would pursue a proper membership in NATO.

So what we will likely see is that Russia will want to maintain or increase their presence in eastern Ukraine, maintain Crimea and want assurances that Ukraine will remain a neutral buffer state.

Leading to the Ukraine being screwed over either way.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's just "Ukraine". "The Ukraine" implies that it's a territory and not the name of an independent country.

[–] krebssteven@infosec.pub 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Technically it’s both, given the etymology of the word. Just as you say ‘The United States of America’ or ‘The Republic of Congo’.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They care only about maintaining their own geopolitical interests.

That used to be the case. Now the US only cares about whatever Trump wants, AKA whatever Putin told him he wants.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Any time anyone says something like OP did, I imagine them in front of a whiteboard trying to explain to themselves how the US of today is the same US as last month.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Along with geopolitical interests, the US is interested in Ukraine’s natural resources.

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/09/16/senator-lindsey-graham-ukraine-trillion-minerals/

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What was his BAC at the time?

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

At this point in his miserable attempt at a life, his alcohol has no blood...

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh come on, if you're going to shake UA down for 500B in rare earths the least you can do is a li'l reacharound while fucking them in the ass. Stay classy.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

You'd think Zekensky would give him that amount in relation to the amount of land liberated.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

What his opinion after he loosens up with a gallon of vodka or 2?