this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

9307 readers
596 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago

Was pleasantly surprised then noticed it's already converted to USD. :(

It's the prices I expected but I was hoping they actually meant it when they wanted to go for market share.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

The 9070 would have to be below $500 to have a chance.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Those are both much cheaper than the 5080 and significantly cheaper than the 5090.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And most likely a lot slower as well. You should probably compare them with 5070 / 5070Ti.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Most benchmarks I've seen put them around 5070ti for RT performance and 5080 for raster performance. They're about where AMD thought the 5070 was going to be before NVidia surprised us all with such a dissapointing launch.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

How does it compare to the RX 7800XT etc. tho?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Are they suppsot to be competitive with nvidia top end?

[–] theboomr@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

According to AMD themselves, no.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's all down to performance for that price and how it will compete with NVIDIA and also itself with RX 7900 series.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Got an open box 7900 XT waiting at home. I'm trying my best to wait for reliable info on performance and pricing of the 9070 XT, but my guess is that it won't be faster and the 20 GB VRAM would be nice. I paid 600 EUR including VAT and it sure doesn't look like the 9070 XT will be cheaper than that or so fast that it would warrant a higher price. Even if we assume that RT performance and FSR 4 will be great.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I just got a 7900 XTX because of the much better performance to price ratio. And 24 GB VRAM should help it last quite a while. The trouble was finding stock in Canada. I imagine this 9000 series will have the same issue.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Keep in mind that US customer will likely pay a at least 10% more due to stupid tariffs and we're still need to see what the actual performance is.