this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
116 points (97.5% liked)

World News

33428 readers
542 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

When orange man starts talking about denuclearization agreements

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Looking at these comments: so now liberals love nuclear weapons?

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Americans are ruled by a politics of opposition. Anything Trump does, the opposite must be good. Anything Biden does, the opposite must be good. Nobody thinks about anything from scratch.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Denuclearizing worked out so well for Ukraine.

[–] Garibaldee@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Having less nukes is not the same as disarmament it's not even comparable. They dropped two nukes and did that much destruction in Japan, 2, and those were 1940s nukes, even with this change the US would still have thousands of nukes.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-many-nuclear-weapons-exist-and-who-has-them/

the United States admits to having 5,550

Ukraine went to 0 nukes, the US has 5000+ nukes, how would that even be comparable if the US let's say went down to 1000 nukes. That's still 1000 nukes more than 0.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Nukes wouldn't have saved them from being couped

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago
[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Since this actually sounds like a good decision... Over/under on Trump promising to double the amount of nukes and turn China into a nuclear wasteland unless they do something for him, by the end of next week?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was gonna make a joke about this being the thing that finally makes Democrats fight Trump... But then I saw all the pro-nuke .world comments. We're so cooked

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

USA have absolutely abysmal records of upholding nuclear disarmament so IF it is even a serious proposition, the reason for it it's the quickly incoming time when Minutemen missiles will have to be decomissioned while its replacement is so much overbudget and overtime that it seriously risk scrapping of entire project. Meaning the perspective USA will lose main part of its strategic armament is real.

Also you never, ever trust USA on any nuclear deals.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also let's not forget that the US is literally hiring Elon Musk to help then "win" the nuclear war, their words not mine.

How anyone can think their denuclearization proposal is in good faith is beyond me.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'll believe it when I see it. Military spending increased in his first term and talk is cheap.

If he actually followed through on cutting the military budget by half, it'd be an incredible move and I'd start considering him the lesser evil. But it's all for show, it's triangulation to appeal to certain groups. End of the day, he's a right winger and right wingers won't cut the military.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Denuclearization is a good thing.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes it's a good thing, but the US is utterly devoid of honour and trustworthiness and there's no chance they will actually follow through with denuclearizing their own arsenal, so this proposal is meaningless and no country should take it seriously.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

True. The US is the only country that ever used them and the only country where politicians regularly threaten to use them. Somehow though they get to act as if they are the only ones that can be trusted with them.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“We’re all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually, hopefully much more productive,” Trump said.

🫨

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Like lining the pockets of me and my owners while systematically weakening the country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what's gonna happen when a finger on the monkey's paw curls for this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everyone's perspective is the same on Lemmy it seems or close and its getting old so much snide comments and negativity. We all should consider this a win regardless of how goofy any side is, its the thought that this approach is reaching the decision makers. Planting the seed.

I think this is likely one of the smartest things Trump has ever persued if it comes to fruition even partially a mere slither. The modern battlefield is fought with technology. Using drones/robots and infosec psyop and the list goes on and on.

Conventional war has more risk than worth now days leaves nothing but a pile of rocks nothing to claim but dirt.

While I don't think anyone will give them up soon sure even bad actors will hodl old means eventually the value prop and cost to maintain will sputter out, we all should know we have been heading that direction for a very long time. Progress no matter how small is a step in the right direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

I refuse to believe trump will do anything decent like this

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like a good deal to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›