this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1630 readers
92 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Feh. True AI adherents know that it is simply time to claim that AI has outgrown measurement designed for human minds (e.g. mental impairment tests) and require new tests for machine intelligence (trenchcoat volume tests). Of course these tests are yet to be invented and will obviously require billions of your human dollars for development.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 4 hours ago

there were counterarguments that the authors anthropomorphised the LLMs inappropriately - which is a valid objection - and therefore these tests shouldn't have been run at all. The answer to that is that the companies are marketing this shit by anthropomorphising the hell out of it and literally claiming these spicy autocompletes are on the path to artificial super intelligence. So of course cognitive tests are gonna be appropriate.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 7 points 8 hours ago

"Slightly senile robot" is giving LLMs too much credit. My slightly senile homies rock in ways LLMs cannot fathom.