this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
205 points (96.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

28551 readers
2216 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The current hostile corporate takeover in the USA and the clear loss of political power of the common people, I started wondering what happened if people used consumption as their leverage. Since the system is designed for continuous growth, what would happen if a mass movement of people stopping buying new non-essential consumer goods?

It would send a much stronger message than angry public protests. Thoughts?

Edit 1: Received some fantastic responses one of these highlighted February 28th as the "National No Spend Day" that we can consider the rehearsal.

*Do not make any purchases Do not shop online, or in-store, No Amazon, No Walmart, No Best Buy, Nowhere!

Do not spend money on: Fast Food,Gas,Major Retailers Do not use Credit or Debit Cards for non essential spending

WHAT YOU CAN DO: Only buy essentials of absolutely necessary (Food, Medicine, Emergency Supplies) If you must spend, ONLY support small, local businesses.*

This movement is the definition of equitable, not spending means everybody can contribute within their means, and if you can't afford to buy shit anyway, you're already doing your part!

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2025/02/12/national-no-spend-day-economic-blackout-amazon-walmart/78410711007/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The main problem with these things is people buying stuff before, so they can boycott the next day. Makes absolutely no difference.

Obviously, what you're describing is different.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

agree. the main idea is to shift away from buying new to buying used, bartering, using cash. there's such abundance of used goods in the US people actually wouldn't have to compromise their lifestyles and this could continue on for months and months and months.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Im already trying my best to move off any services tied to any oligarch at Trumps inauguration.

I just bought a kindle but planning on donating it and moving to Kobo.

Side hobby to learn to pirate safely. Im now using any alternate website to Amazon.

We have the power of voice with our wallets.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Oh no, what's this?

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Just use the kindle without amazon stuff, maybe install KOReader, you can get your books from somewhere else.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

I would but just knowing its a kindle disgusts me. Already bought a kobo.

I think ill donate my kindle instead.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The Day the World Stops Shoppong examined this and found that it doesn’t take a whole lot of concerted action to tank the consumption economy.

Buy nothing days are good but less good if you return to regular habits and redouble your consumption after the boycott is over.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 18 points 10 hours ago

I already have. Long before the threat of tariffs. I shop thrift stores, yard sales, and social media markets. I go to electronics recyclers and find perfectly good laptops that just need an OS installed.

I’ve had the same phone since 2017, and the same car for 10+ years, neither of which were new when I got them.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 25 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I've already planned with my wider family that for the next 4 years we aren't doing jack shit for holidays. No black friday (tbh we never did anyway), no cyber Monday. No gifts for Christmas.

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 5 points 4 hours ago

I've been doing homemade gifts or local market goods for xmas the past couple xmas

[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 11 points 12 hours ago

I haven't celebrated xmas for several years now and it's seriously been so liberating.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 67 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If y'all aren't already aware the first test date for Consumer Power is on Feb 28th. Don't buy ANYTHING on that date. Yeah, it's brief, it will probably be a blip, but this is like a test of the emergency broadcast system. If we can get say 2% of people to do that, then watch closely for reactions, it will help us spread the word for the 2nd test. Then the 3rd. It's only through this grassroots organization that we can accomplish anything.

I had a friend tell me that they'd already seen organizations trying to make it their idea and honestly, I'm not at all concerned about who is putting their brand on it. The POINT here is that we need to start exercising our muscles to make this a real tool for change. Stop focusing on that message and start embracing the larger goal here. Spread the word. RESIST.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Thanks edited my OP to advertise this. i like passive resistance, it takes much fewer resources, non-violent etc.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 42 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I already barely buy shit. I've always said "if the economy hinged on my purchasing habit, the country would go bankrupt". People in general should start living within their means without any protest. It's good for everyone and also will make corporations slow down on killing this planet.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

I already barely buy shit. I’ve always said “if the economy hinged on my purchasing habit, the country would go bankrupt”.

well, you're already part of the movement:)

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

yup. Im in a similar boat. could not reduce more. we really need a blender and I saw one for an estate sale next weekend. hoping they have some plates, bowls, and cups to. eff the corps.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Facebook market place has a ton of cheap things. I bought two 27" 4k HDR monitors for $130 from there. Those monitors are literally $1100 new. I bought my GPU for $100, and it's $380 new. People buy shit they don't need and upgrade in a year, too. It's fucking insanity. Check it out if you have an account. I use my wife's.

yeah its more avoiding corp as much as possible. The money saving is a side effect. So im preferring garage and estate sales and certain second hand shops. Old fashioned person to person local.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Plates, cups and bowls can be bought second hand at charity/opp/goodwill shops in my experience. They also often have small appliances, sometimes new as people donate unwanted gifts. Pie makers are very common. Noone should buy new pie makes.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Great recommendation. I always get cheap cloths from goodwill and other charity places. You can find great t-shirts and pants there for real cheap. Good "brands", too.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

that would probably be impossible and wouldn't have a lot of effect cuz demand is an elastic band or something

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

but a lot of the demand can be met by buying used stuff

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Buying used stuff should be illegal! The government is losing out on taxes, and the producers don't get the revenue. Are you not thinking about the shareholders?

Tap for spoiler/s

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

You jest, but I'm pretty sure all the secondhand shops I go to charge sales tax.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 45 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

It certainly would, but I would be worried about the people at the bottoms whose salary depend on this. Rich people can afford not getting revenue for a month, but people with precarious work contracts often can't.
What about mass boycott targeted at the companies undeniably supporting this government?
It could impact bottom people less.

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 33 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is where mutual aid comes in.

Share cash with people who need it. Pay their bills, pay their rent, pay their bail money, pay their medical expenses.

The capitalists will hurt people to try to get you to stop boycotting and striking.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Not to be a dick, but I barely have enough money to cover myself and my wife. I don't exactly have any extra money, and our budget is tighter than a tightrope wire, which I suppose is part of the point.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dontbelasagne@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We need society to go back to our earliest economy. The gift economy, just sharing things expecting nothing in return. I wonder what life would be like if that was our main economy.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I try to explain to people how incredible that would be. I don't believe in pay it back or pay it forward. I believe in helping people because it's what we should be doing, it's the way society should function. I don't expect anything in return, and I don't want someone I help to pay it forward because I helped them, I want them to help others because it's what everyone should be doing at all times, so much as they are able to. Building the new within the shell of the old and all that

[–] dontbelasagne@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The bit that these people don't understand is pretty much everyone has done and taken part in the gift economy. But capitalism has brainwashed people to slave over pieces of paper. But if you've ever explained the rules to a board game, helped family members with tech support, helped a roommate learn how to cook a dish then people have partaken in the gift economy. I could list a thousand more examples. Even leaving internet comments is part of a gift economy if you leave a comment, you're not expecting anything in return and many internet comments are helping people asking about stuff they need help for. The gift economy is so engrained in everyday life yet capitalism just has decades of propaganda.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago

People argue about human nature, wars, warlords, yada yada. But that is shit is so exceedingly rare to the literal hundreds of examples per day of people simply doing for others, even going out of their way, taking from themselves to do so, with absolutely no expectation of reward or thanks, simply because it brings us joy to be members of our community. Altruism is ingrained in us the way breathing is. It's automatic. So much so, we don't realize we're doing it. It's a detriment, in ways, if we were more aware of it, we might well be more able to recognize our natural ways, and be able to combat the bullshit propaganda. But as it stands, we don't even realize we're doing it.

:(

[–] Bocky@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Should turn Amazon prime week into boycott week. We just did a one week break from Amazon in our house and it was refreshing.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

1 week? Are you talking about tv or buying stuff? I haven't done anything with amazon in years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 26 points 16 hours ago

"Culture Is Not Consumption"

Write that on a tee shirt you already own.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Anything that $peaks their language will work better than protests IMO

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If even a relatively small number — say 10-20% — just refused to buy anything other than the bare essentials (like food, energy, utils) until action was taken, you'd probably see more action than if those people got out in the streets and protested.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That action would be increasing the price of bare essentials to compensate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They'll just buy the things they didn't buy before hand, or afterwards, washing it all out in the average.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

After a long enough period of striking it begins to have repercussions beyond the individual budget.

If the flow of money slowed to a crawl for an extended period, companies don't have the funds to pay workers. Enough job loss leads to further reduced spending, thus impacting stock value, thus impacting employment, etc...

A month would have a noticeable impact, but a full fiscal quarter would be the first cliff where the big corporations would really sweat. But generally I agree, an economic strike with an end date is like an overnight hunger strike

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you got a substantial amount of people to it, like 40-50% of the population it would probably collapse the economy via domino effect. So much is underpinned on people spending money on any given day

But, I don't see it happening in reality, just getting 20% to actually do it would be a massive undertaking and 20% would probably be painful, but not cause a cool cascade of collapse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 8 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I'm sure this will be an unpopular opinion, but any publicly traded company no longer needs to post a profit. Boomers are retiring and 401ks ensure that these companies will make money purely from "value potential". Maybe in 20 or so years as the demographics change this will be different, but this is how I see it going down today.

If all of America collectively decided not to purchase from publicly traded companies, and instead only bought from small local companies for just one month. I doubt it would even register on a YTD stock price chart. It would need to be a true philosophical change in how we consume products, and it would have to last for longer than a month to be effective. On top of that, only privileged households will realistically be able to "choose" not to buy consumer goods.

I think we should all buy less and be more mindful of where our money goes. I think we should buy locally and promote businesses that you agree with on levels beyond the value of the good or services they offer as often as possible. However, I don't think we can effectively protest this way unless it was a true lifestyle change for a large portion of the country.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

should all buy less and be more mindful of where our money goes. I think we should buy locally and promote businesses that you agree with on levels beyond the value of the good or services they offer as often as possible. However, I don’t think we can effectively protest this way unless it was a true lifestyle change for a large portion of the country.

I'd disagree, we saw it with COVID how vulnerable corporations are. They'll always focus on stock buybacks and stuff like that over recession-proofing. Also, this is quite an equitable movement. Those who can't afford new shit are already contributing to it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Won't happen but it's a great idea. The environment loves recession. The only years in recent history when the climate indicators briefly stopped moving in the wrong direction were 2009 and 2020.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Both. Definitely both. Every person has a unique capacity for resistance, so however you’re able is good and important. Talking about it, protesting, boycotting (even in tiny amounts) is something! Being nice to yourself and others in non-consumerist ways is also resistance; like hand-write a note instead of buying a card; your loved one will still appreciate it.

The point is to be a dandelion - they try to pave over us, and we pop back up through the cracks, even in our own little unassuming ways. We may be ants to them but insects outnumber vertebrate life forms by orders of magnitude.

Lots of metaphors as I get sidetracked but case in point: if you can do it, do it!

ETA: Decentralized forms of resistance may be our best bet. Big coordinated efforts are good. Making them play whack-a-mole is also good. If they don’t know where to look next even better.

load more comments
view more: next ›