this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

45393 readers
1571 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

thats like any conservative or liberal i try to reason with

[–] juli@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

US War Crimes!

bUt oRaNgE mAn iS wOrSe.

Why do you think he acts like he rules the world, you wankers? cuz you've defended your presidents from any consequences, forever.

But, now you have a problem?

How does it feel like to taste your own medicine?

[–] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

How does it feel like to taste your own medicine

Yanks aren't even tasting a fraction of it

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Speaking of war crimes...

I dislike US rule because it self-imposes itself over the entire world, trying to insert its media in every facet of everyone's life, its military in impoverished countries, effectively forcing them to stay poor and "not a threat to US democracy" under the guise of rescue, etc.. One state's terrorist is a people's freedom fighter. I looked back at 9/11 for example, the event they're still sensitive about. The US, through oppression and infestation, turned men into the 'terrorists' that became Al Qaeda. This narrative is retold in media, the morals and messages are retold but the public seemingly ignores it.

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not a specific example, but it infuriates me more than anything when people say it doesn't matter that hardware, software and media are becoming increasingly dependent on an internet connection to operate.

People lack the foresight to care that the things they are paying for right now, wont last like similar things do from 10-20+ years ago.

Your old dvds, vhs, cds, vinyls, game consoles, tvs telephones.

The current implementations of these mediums have taken ownership away from the consumer, and nobody cares.

I anticipate a massive loss of historically pertinent hardware and information that will result in the new norm of paying for limited access to anything and everything.

Maximum consumption and profit, minimal preservation and environmental efficiency.

Nobody cares, like we are all slowly boiling frogs.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These devices also collect a lot of personal data. The internet connection isn’t necessarily for the device to be useful, but rather to serve ads or sell user information to the highest bidder. Just look at how cars gather data that insurance companies buy. Or the news that Jeep were going to start displaying ads in the center console.

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

The motives behind this or any form of planned obsolescence are various, usually greed is the reasoning central to these motives, but none of them justify the detriment to the end user(from the end user's perspective).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Trump getting elected

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ads based internet is the death of democracy

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why are ads being made for the internet?

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The comment is about the case google won for collection and selling data of individuals and the ramifications of that case. This is the primary underlying issue in the present.

The right to own and sell a part of a person—their digital self is ultimately a forfeiture of autonomous citizenship. It is also an implied forfeiture of freedom of information which is the third pillar of democracy. Allowing the ownership over a part of a citizen is giving up citizenship. This is why you do not own anything, and everything is a subscription, and enshitification; it is all due to this one core issue of your right to own all of yourself free from slavery including the sale and exploitation of a part of your person. This is a master link, the precedent that lead to where we are at. "The ads based internet" is about the sale and collection of your personal data with the intent to exploit you. That is a violation of a fundamental human right. This was never about banner ads. It is about placing people in information bubbles and spheres of influence. It is about stupid consumers and corporate overlords extracting taxes for every move a peasant makes. Such is the true power of controlling information. Like your internet search results are not deterministic. It does not matter where you search. There are only 2 web crawlers that are relevant in the present world; Google/Microsoft. All others indirectly query these two. They can fingerprint and track nearly everyone in real time. You are being targeted for more than just ads. This is the death of democracy because a citizen must be autonomous and well informed in any democracy and this is not possible when you can be manipulated through bowdlerization and targeted misinformation or overload.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›