this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
929 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3618 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 4 points 26 minutes ago

Now all governments around the globe and other public services and we.are getting somewhere.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I feel like scientists should move towards open source solutions ... I feel like most scientists are smart enough to launch a mastodon server, but well.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Most scientists aren't allowed to do stuff like that, or purely just don't have the time.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

What.. Are you taking about? I know hundreds of scientists and the vast majority of them interact with social media just as much as normal people.

[–] finder585@lemmy.world 5 points 22 minutes ago

I'd reckon that managing a social media server is more involved than just using social media.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

Some of us have. There are a few science focused servers.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Never meet your heroes. If a scientist is human, they're as fallible as any other. Just like some teachers aren't there because they're passionate. Some legitimately are bad if you ever had parent teacher conferences. Not passion nor intelligence saves you from making poor choices

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 hour ago

There's no excuse for using Xittter in 2025.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago

See you can be a really good scientist and not smart at the same time. Move to mastodon.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 78 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Non-EU folk - this website won’t open in EU because they don’t want to follow our local user privacy protections. What they’re going to do with your data? Who knows.

[–] androidul@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 hours ago

man that is so cheeky of them!

Instead of abiding with the law, they just chose to block content altogether 🥲

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 20 points 5 hours ago

Archive

But yeah, you're 100% right.

[–] Avia_Vik@jlai.lu 26 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

Why switch to BlueSky if you have Mastodon...

[–] Djfok43@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Cause the name is hard to remember.. I was trying to yesterday and the closest I could get is megatron and megalodon

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

It's a big elephant and you send "Toots!".

How do you confused that with a cynical robot and a giant shark? You'd post "Quips!" or "Bites!". Wouldn't work at all. 🙄

[–] Katrisia@lemm.ee 1 points 28 minutes ago

"Bites" is so cool...

[–] benjaminb@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

I tried masterdon, mostertant (I don’t know what that one is) and eventually needed to look up the name from an E-Mail…

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I think there's a fairly serious problem for large accounts on mastodon but I will never have one so I can't quite understand it myself.

Something like dealing with replies / scolds without spending all day blocking is too hard. It doesn't help that "no algorithm" means "show first reply at the top" so quick replies can dominate comments.

The bit I don't understand is why this is fine on blue sky. Is it just different users? I can't quite believe that but I can't see why blue sky would be less annoying.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

It's not that it's less annoying, it's that it was in the right place at the right time to capture sufficient network effect..

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

These who waited until the X take over to move away are simply following trends.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 36 points 4 hours ago (16 children)

I'm on both and Mastodon is missing (at least in any easy to use way) most of the features that make Bluesky such a good destination:

  • instant add subscribe lists
  • subscribable block lists
  • custom feeds/subscribable algorithms
  • keyword/topic blocks
  • nuclear block where you never see the blocked person again
  • optional discover feed
  • DM preferences

All these things (and more I'm sure I'm forgetting), make Bluesky very quick to get started with and very powerful for honing your feeds to be exactly how you want and free of harassment and trolling.

I am still trying with Mastodon, but it's really slow going and I can fully understand why people wouldn't bother. After a year I am way behind where I was in a week with Bluesky.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It does have keyword blocking.

Not sure what nuclear block means but I can't think of any way a blocked person could be seen again. It even has above nuclear blocking where you block their entire server.

It has custom feeds but the implementation with lists is very fiddly and I wish it would be improved.

There is a trending posts section but I think you want a personalised discover feed? Which will never happen of course.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the update. Yes the recommended feed is personalized. It's optional. The main feed has no algorithm, just who you follow.

Keyword blocking is a bit more sophisticated on Bluesky I think as they have a crowdsourced tagging system which allows you to opt in an out also of tagged words regardless of whether they appear in the body of the post.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Yes the recommended feed is personalized. It's optional. The main feed has no algorithm,, just who you follow.

The thing is, a lot of social media sites have or had this. YouTube has the subscriptions feed. Twitter has (I don't know anymore) a following feed. Reddit used to keep posts on your homepage only being from subscribed subreddits.

One problem. People don't use them. They see maintaining subscriptions as work and so want to be fed posts by algorithm.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] rosco385@lemm.ee 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In a word, audience. I'd prefer it if everyone went with Mastodon, but the audience on BlueSky is orders of magnitude bigger. I cross post to both, but only because I don't trust BlueSky not to do exactly what Twitter and Meta have done eventually.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

They might do the Twitter. Jack Dorsey has already left the board saying exactly that.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago

Guess why? /s For real, people, some of you live in a bubble...

load more comments
view more: next ›