186
submitted 2 years ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/programming@programming.dev
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No joke I let them know about that in their official discussion board day 1 copilot came out. When they announced it, the first day you could ask it about the contents of private repos and it would just tell you.

They fixed it but this looks really similar.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

The fact that there are so many “acts” that got violated tells me that those laws are just as shoddy as the fact that Microsoft’s fix didn’t take into account that the AI still has access to private data. Total shit show on all fronts.

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago

Microsoft: Copilot is the future! /s

[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As one commented below the article, "Recall too I bet".
It's like the dumbest anosmic sheep dog that'll just show the wolf the way to the sheep.

[-] three@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
[-] mrbn@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago

Kind of a nothing burger.

These repositories, belonging to more than 16,000 organizations, were originally posted to GitHub as public, but were later set to private, often after the developers responsible realized they contained authentication credentials allowing unauthorized access or other types of confidential data. Even months later, however, the private pages remain available in their entirety through Copilot.

The repo was listed as public and archived. It's not clear from the article but I suspect that the "private" information is just a copy of what was made public and not the information added after it was made private.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago

When a code repository is shut down on github the expectation is that it's removed. We're all aware that the internet will never forget that API key you accidentally committed once but the expectation was always that it wouldn't be github itself doing the remembering and openly sharing it with others.

[-] rijom@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

According to the article it was Bing and not GitHub.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

"According to the article it was Microsoft and not Microsoft."

Do you see now how silly you sound?

[-] rijom@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

From an ownership perspective, sure. But it’s still different from the implication that github is leaking currently private repositories.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
186 points (98.9% liked)

Programming

28322 readers
655 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS