this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
469 points (95.5% liked)

196

17043 readers
1190 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, where are 99% of the life begins at conception people on the meat industry?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago

One single HUMAN cell, everyone knows humans are above all animals

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (10 children)

If you're really being serious, then the answer is that most (or, at least, the vocal majority) of those people don't even really care about living children. I don't see that type of person generally giving any more care to a non-human being than they would a human being, and they already don't care about people other than themselves.

"Pro-life" has always been a misnomer. More honest descriptions would be "anti-choice" or "pro-forced birth."

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

It's anti-woman.

The real true reason most people are against abortion isn't because they don't believe it's a necessity. It's because they are afraid that some woman won't be punished for having sex. Whether or not the fetus survives isn't the point, it's that someone has to be punished for enjoying life.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Pro-life

In their mind, is still just breeding more cheap disposable labor

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Serious in that they should stand up for non-human animals, but in the kind of way where you also know the answer as to why 99% aren't

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 10 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

It's racism. They think human lives are more important than other races.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

The human race thinks they're the supreme race, better than the other races.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It is so prevalent that this type of bigotry actually has its own name: specieism

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

beat me to it (by only 11h :D)

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world -4 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Yes, exactly. The complexity of the human soul is uncomparable to the basic impulses of any animal.

[–] amon@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

A single cell

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Embryos don't have souls. The soul develops during the third trimester.

If you can play music into your belly and get a kick, that thing has a soul. But there's a lot of time where it's not that developed.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago) (1 children)

Poor choice of words on my part, perhaps. Maybe, if I chose "mind, instead of the more poetic word "soul" people would not reply about how an embryo is not ensouled.

But please tell me, was your original comment about racism towards animals sarcastic? It is sometimes hard to tell, and it seems almost like a position someone would hold.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 1 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely a vegan because I think racism is wrong.

Single cells don't have a mind either. Minds are made of neurons. An embryo begins developing neural cells during the fifth week of development. That's just a few neurons, though, not a full brain. A fetus doesn't get smart enough to process sounds until the late second. If a mind isn't even complex enough to process any sensory information, is it more deserving of life than a cow? Cows like to run in the grass and play. They have social relationships. Fetuses aren't that complex.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Obviously I am not talking about fetuses. I responded to the racism comment and the inner lives of people are generally not that complicated when tbey are in the womb. I am just using this as a reason to value humans over animals.

Also, minds are not made out of neurons, brains are.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Where exactly in the single cell is the soul stored?

[–] FruitLips@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Says what, some ancient text?

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago

Definitely seems the type to make Star Wars analogies

[–] PigStyle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of them explain this away with "Humans have souls, animals don't".

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And yet many can be up in arms about dogs & cats being eaten in some regions despite that claim

[–] amon@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I don't care what species it is

I have three requirements for meat:

  • It isn't human flesh
  • It isn't rotten
  • It's cooked properly
[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

dogs go to dog heaven, duh
of they got souls! /s

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently that soul doesn't matter when trying to prevent it from dying from preventable diseases with vaccines and nurturing it with affordable education.

[–] Glytchrider@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't you know it's much more preferable for your child to die of a preventable illness than for them to get autism from vaccines which is totally a thing that happens?

/s of course

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

When I infodump for 2 hours straight I can see why they would prefer if I died /s

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's even worse. One of the contributing factors for autism is fine dust particles in pollution from fossil fuels. And the ones against vaccines are often also the ones for fossil fuels.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But that's different!

Honestly though, is "but it's different" a proper informal fallacy?

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are pro-birth. They are absolutely not pro-life.

[–] celeste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think they're anti-woman.

[–] ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 23 hours ago

Think? We fucking know.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 17 hours ago

That explains the obsession with cows' milk...

Anytime someone throws a fit about noncows milk being called milk, "Like, you know why they produce milk, right?"

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah but if babies were delicious we would eat them too

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this implying you know for certain that human babies aren't? Maybe we should be a little concerned how you figured that one out

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So I ate a baby big whoop wanna fight about it?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Baby Big Whoop? Damn there's a whole product line now?

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm told humans taste like pork.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Some cultures that actually have cannibalism refer to human flesh as "long pig" or similar because of the resemblance.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've got a modest proposal for you...

I wanted to say that but wasn't swift enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›