514

Diplomacy dies on live TV as Trump and Vance gang up to bully Ukraine leader (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by just_another_person@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Posting to show that not only US media is seeing it this way. It was a disgrace.

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[+] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 125 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[deleted]

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yours is the only credible explanation I've seen so far

Here's something I thought of while watching: Who's backing up Zelenskiy and giving him the courage to walk away like he did?

Somewhat related: Years ago I read a blog post about "who's really in charge". Basically it's the MIC. At what point does the MIC flex and assert its interests in continuing the conflict in Ukraine?

Trump's hands were quickly tied in 2017, just as Obama found himself in 2009, by the bureaucracy, congressional gridlock, and the demands of the donor class. It's the overarching theme of a Chapo miniseries, Hell of Presidents: US executives have little ability to make sweeping changes even when they have a mandate.

So now he's there and trying to beat them all by firing everyone. Trump's only personal goals seem to be ending Ukraine conflict and pretending to be tough on immigration. He hires loyalist sycophants and lets them pursue their own agendas (Christianists, Nazis, RFK medical quackery, etc) because they agree to stay out of his way on his pet issues.

The lawless takeover by Musk has kept me awake at night. These people are just doing whatever they want and daring anybody to stop them.

What I saw in this bizarre piece of diplomacy theatre was a huge crack in the facade. Nobody conducts serious diplomacy this way. This is desperation by Trump to gain some leverage through public opinion and put Zelenskiy on the spot. Trump's desired course of action with Ukraine threatens the legitimacy and mission of the postwar empire (regardless of what you or I think about US imperialism and NATO) and a lot of folks are deeply invested in that arrangement

This is all just ideas floating around in my head that seem somehow related. I'm sure someone else can make sense of it, or tell me why I'm way off base

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Sorry for my ignorance, what’s/who’s the MIC?

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Military Industrial Complex

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Ahh gotcha

[-] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

According to details leaking to the press, Zelenskyy didn’t walk but was thrown out.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The setup was that this deal gave the US veto power over how Ukraine spent it's mineral resources, which could be used to blackmail them in all sorts of ways, including forcing ceasefire and land cessation and any number of shady Trump-backed deals. Zelensky made clear this would only be considered if it coincided with some prospect of security guarantees, which Trump refused to even hint at.

This entire meeting was a setup to bully him into signing it regardless and Zelensky didn't bite so they went off on him to blame him for things falling apart.

Nothing was lost herr except a lot of people's time and the dignity of the US. Trump was never gonna help Ukraine secure actual lasting peace, he serves Russia

[-] datendefekt@feddit.org 13 points 2 years ago

My take on this is that Trump promised that he would end the war quickly. Turns out it's not that easy to do so that it pleases Putin and make him rich. Then escalates the conversation into a shouting match so that he can deflect the blame on Zelenksy and save face.

[-] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

It’s also revenge for Zelenskyy not complying with Trumps extortion to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden, which led to Trumps first impeachment. He hates Zelenskyy for that.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 78 points 2 years ago

Vance is such a piece of shit. Fuck him.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

I simply cannot understand how anyone can take him seriously. How do you see him go from calling Trump "America's Hitler" to being a sniveling suck-up to everything Trump says and does without realizing he has absolutely no spine? I mean, I don't know why I am surprised at this point, anyone who hasn't been put off by Trump in the past decade isn't going to care about a little thing like a moral backbone, and yet I still just find myself dumbfounded by the lows we somehow continue to sink towards.

[-] throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

It makes more sense when you realize he wasn't using "America's Hitler" as an insult.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Nah, he's more into fucking couches

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago

Anyone else noticed a clear link between this and what happened not too long ago with Macron exposing him as the liar that he is in front of everyone by very tactfully and diplomatically fact checking him?

It really looks like Trump was terrified to get a repeat of that with Zelenskyi so he brought Vance along for backup and then whenever Zelenskyi was about to make a point they'd just speak over him, repeating their own bullshit narrative over and over again.

It's pathetic.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

If he wasn't ruining the world you could almost feel sorry for an old man so insecure with himself and unable to come to any self-reflection despite how far along he is in his twilight years.

But it's Trump and he is an absolute moron and you just hope that slightly off-level piece of concrete where he walks finally comes for his hip, shattering it in a billion pieces and doing him in permanently.

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Did you just call JV Vance Trump's stunt cock? Cause JV Vance totally was Trump's stunt cock!

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago

He was his chicken wingman.

[-] martin4598@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

My thought, exactly. A petty revenge.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 years ago

In France it was called an extraordinary meltdown:

"Earlier Friday, Trump cut the meeting short with Zelensky, said the Ukrainian leader is "not ready" for peace with Russia in an extraordinary meltdown in the Oval Office that threw question marks over chances for a truce"

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/united-states/article/2025/02/28/trump-and-zelensky-openly-clash-in-heated-white-house-exchange_6738686_133.html

In Germany it was a shouting match:

US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance's conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office turned into a shouting match.

https://p.dw.com/p/4rE1i

If you look at European news sources, it's filled with representatives from various countries all saying variations of "holy shit, we really can't trust the US anymore".

[-] otto@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have had a low-key crush on Zelensky for about 15 years.

Nothing has ever made me respect the man more than him standing up to both Trump and Vance. This is a man worthy of praise for his fortitude and his dedication to his people.

I wish the United States could have a leader even a fraction as strong as Zelensky.

[-] Tower@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

"I need ammunition, not a ride."

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 15 points 2 years ago

"We're not playing cards"

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

You and me both buddy :(

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trump looked like a bully with severe memory disorder and Vance looked nothing short of foolish. Both were completely outwitted.

Vance is a fish out of water, bereft of tact.

[-] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

vance does have an excuse: he was distracted by the couch

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

So trump claimed he would have peace for Israel and Russia within the first day...

How many days are we in?

Putting this on national television was a disgrace, of course but also a fascinating insight into cheeto's "diplomacy". As expected, of course, there was zero diplomacy, it was all bullying, spouting conspiracy theories l, screeching about demanding respect, it was terrible and if it wasn't so tragic we could all laugh about what a sad and pathetic little men the cheeto and co are.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Winston Churchill was a fucking racist asshole. Not sure he would shed a tear to see this racist clown act like a bully.

Edit: why was this downvoted?

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Edit: why was this downvoted?

I'd assume less pro-Churchill sentiment, more "people don't read articles and are wondering why you brought up Churchill"

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025

514 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31602 readers

4325 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News