this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
159 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8128 readers
1660 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

You should post this to buycanadian.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canada really needs a domestic search engine and chat,/messaging platform. Those are two huge gaps thatnhace major privacy applications

[–] white_nrdy@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While I'm all for having local services like search engines. I don't think we need more "messaging platform" services. At least not new complete platforms. I'd argue something like a Canadian popularized Matrix host or something.

Full disclosure, I'm American but fully support not depending on us. We fucking suck.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

True and even using a federated search engine would be great

[–] white_nrdy@programming.dev 1 points 10 minutes ago

Quick question, what would federation provide? How would they have anything to do with a search engine?

Do you mean just not centralized/run by big tech? If so, that wouldn't necessarily be "federated", but just self hostable. That way you can host it yourself, if you have the know how/equipment, or you can access someone else's hosted version (probably for a price).

[–] Slax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Duolingo if you're learning French: mauril.ca

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is amazing. Though I would recommend licensing under something like CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.

While you are entitled to write your own license, nobody who is familiar with copyright licensing will ever use your material, as the license isn't commonly recognized.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This. People write all sorts of cute-sounding licenses that deter people from contributing or forking because of the unknown legal consequences.

[–] Tea@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

License?The person or persons who have associated work with this document (the "Dedicator" or "Certifier") hereby either (a) certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the work of authorship identified is in the public domain of the country from which the work is published, or (b) hereby dedicates whatever copyright the dedicators holds in the work of authorship identified below (the "Work") to the public domain. A certifier, moreover, dedicates any copyright interest he may have in the associated work, and for these purposes, is described as a "dedicator" below.

A certifier has taken reasonable steps to verify the copyright status of this work. Certifier recognizes that his good faith efforts may not shield him from liability if in fact the work certified is not in the public domain.

Dedicator makes this dedication for the benefit of the public at large and to the detriment of the Dedicator's heirs and successors. Dedicator intends this dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights under copyright law, whether vested or contingent, in the Work. Dedicator understands that such relinquishment of all rights includes the relinquishment of all rights to enforce (by lawsuit or otherwise) those copyrights in the Work.

Dedicator recognizes that, once placed in the public domain, the Work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used, modified, built upon, or otherwise exploited by anyone for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and in any way, including by methods that have not yet been invented or conceived.

Source.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I searched for your licence and believe it is the "Copyright-Only Dedication (based on United States law) or Public Domain Certification 1.0 United States" licence which isn't recommended for use by the people who wrote it. It also seems like it's only applicable within the United States, which I'm going to assume you don't want. They have a licence chooser you can use to find a recommended licence. The OP suggested one from this list.

[–] Tea@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

You are right, I think it might worth suggesting it to the author on codeberg.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Edit: https://lemmy.ca/post/39897968/14863180

~~Yes, your license is self written~~. Use a standard license like the one I mentioned, and it'll allow people to have better understanding of the legal consequences, such that the content is actually suitable for use in other creative works.

For example, what happens if there are conflicts in laws with the license, which jurisdiction is the default? What is the legal status of derivative works?

There's too many unknowns, and for that reason, anyone understanding copyright law would entirely avoid using your content.

[–] Tea@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

your license

I am not the project leader.

There's too many unknowns

Public domain?

You can do with the project what ever you want with no restrictions.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago

Some countries won't allow you to declare your work to be in the public domain (although Canada isn't one of them). Declaring it CC-0 does about the same thing while working around that issue.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  1. Lol, then you should have just said from the start that you don't control the creative work rather than trying to argue.
  2. Anybody who understands copyright law will never use a self written license. Although another commenter has said the license does have a standard author. Therefore, the creative work is not merely licensed under public domain. I'm not providing legal advice, so you'll have to do your own research.
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dont license NC. People gotta eat.

CC BY-SA is perfect

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Non-Commercial doesn't mean you can't make money off of the content. It just means that the primary intent cannot be for money.

A commercial use is one primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en#ref-commercial-purposes

Although corporate greed has arguably had a bigger contribution to preventing people from eating...

[–] DeathByDenim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This is great, thanks! I've been looking for a VPS provider to get rid of Linode and had trouble find alternatives in my $8/month price range that I currently pay.

[–] SnowshadowII@beige.party 3 points 2 days ago

@Tea Excellent list --thanks . : )

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Nice list. ServaRica should be added. They're based in Montreal.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks!

I'm now trying to see how to get Sync.com to work as a backup provider!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Do y'all have NSL equivalents up there?

[–] fastfinge@rblind.com 1 points 2 days ago

Also serverica for hosting.