this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
454 points (99.6% liked)

politics

21578 readers
4049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/33332812

Sanders used the findings of a recent working paper to denounce Republicans' determination to pass tax cuts that will benefit wealthy Americans the most.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One reason Nixon kept the Vietnam War going for so long was that it was a money maker for US industry. Besides the steel mills making the bombs, there were ships carrying the munitions, trucks delivering the munitions, etc etc.

Remember, in 1960 US minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of a home was $11,000.00

[–] hypnotoad__@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh so at 7.25 an hour, checks math we should be at like 80k for a house today, right? right guys?

[–] Poach@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, the way to read that is: a home costs about 11,000 hours of labor at that time. So assume 400k house, that would mean $36/hr min wage. Now that will be much less in rural areas, but the wages have not kept up with inflation (or productivity). Demand higher wages.

[–] hypnotoad__@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah that was my point, we are in agreement

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Two points. First, the 'merely rich' aren't doing much better than their counterparts of the past. Angelina Jolie isn't substantively richer than Elizabeth Taylor was. Second, the price of luxuries has skyrocketed. The original Corvette cost about $6,000.00 when the average worker made $5,000.00 a year. Today the new Corvette, which isn't even the most expensive car, is about $250,000.00. Tickets to Super Bowl I were about $12.00 iirc.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

MSRP for a Corvette: $69,995.

Also if it were 250,000, Jolie can buy a handful of them every year and never touch the money she has in the bank. The interest would more than cover it.

125,000,000 worth Yearly income of interest if ONLY 5% 6.25 Million.

She can buy a new house, car and furnish it yearly and forget where she put the keys and go buy another every time she forgets where she put them.

I don't think she needs to be doing any better than she is now

Let's have a war!

Jack up the Dow Jones! - FEAR

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

WHAT??? I thought it was called trickledown economics not trickleup economics??? American politicans lie??? WHAT???

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It is literally in the name. Trickle-down. You do know what a trickle is?

Trickledown and firehouse up!

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

what trickled down was piss

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Yeah, it feels like it.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Due largely in part by the party that he keeps aligning with. Capitalism is a cancer that needs to be cut out.