this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
141 points (98.0% liked)

politics

21175 readers
3955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not sure about houses burning down, but I'm just lighting this one on fire.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NovaOG@lemm.ee 1 points 31 minutes ago

Trump doesn't rule out USA's total annihilation, because thats exactly what hes been ordered to do.

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

"Many of you may have to suffer while I destroy our alliances and funnel your money to billionaires, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean when the recession hits he's just going to blame Biden anyway. It doesn't matter what he says now or how many experts say that the tariffs are the cause, line go down? Biden's fault. Things get more expensive? Biden's fault. Unemployment goes up? Believe it or not, Biden's fault.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is the faultless man. Nothing is ever his fault. Economy going bad? Biden did it. Trade war? Those other countries should have just accepted the tariffs without response. That puppy? Shouldn't have gotten in front of his swinging foot.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

That pussy? Shouldn't have been in front of him, cause he'll grab it.

[–] TylerBourbon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Hates to predict things? This Turd Ball constantly predicts every stupid thing he does is going to be a win, like tariffs making us all super rich.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 22 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

I honestly don't understand the point of these tariffs.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Bankrupt most of the country so billionaires get cheap buys for land and equipment. That's exactly what it is.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure he does to be honest.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He does. They’re meant to ruin the US. You don’t require grand plans to destroy something with a sledgehammer.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 1 points 37 minutes ago

I'd argue there's a good chance he doesn't understand anyway but there's someone wormtonguing him in the background that does understand

[–] Plaidboy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

As I understand it: The long term vision is that by increasing the cost of imported goods, domestic goods will have an easier time being competitive. The short term vision is that tariffs can be used to bully other countries into doing things the U.S. wants.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

There's lots and lots and lots of examples of tariffs flopping tho. They have their place for sure I'd say but typically you end up with crappier products for a higher price. And that's not even counting corollary effects like reciprocal tariffs or straining international relationships (which, surprise surprise, we've already seen both of and we haven't even really started yet lol)

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 9 points 4 hours ago

I guess that makes a little sense in a simple world. So, higher prices it is.

Tariffs are a great way to get businesses to bribe Trump. Trump has that sweet immunity for official acts. Might as well use it by getting bribed to open up exemptions to bribing companies.

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

He's been sniffing around in tariffs' dressing room since the 80s when Japan was economically dominating. Rumour is he'd rather date a 25% tarrif on steel than date his own daughter, so that should tell you a lot. He also has a Navarro body pillow.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, so NOW we're giving him credibility? Trusting what he says?

Well he just fired two panels of economic experts, so he’s probably gonna use those guys as scapegoats