this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
998 points (99.0% liked)

News

38864 readers
2313 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Since Trump’s second-term inauguration, five top billionaires have lost a combined $209 billion as markets react to policy uncertainty.

  • Elon Musk’s net worth plunged $148 billion as Tesla shares collapsed amid declining European and Chinese sales.

  • Jeff Bezos lost $29 billion as Amazon stock fell 14%.

  • Sergey Brin’s fortune dropped $22 billion following Alphabet’s weak earnings and regulatory pressure.

  • Mark Zuckerberg and Bernard Arnault each lost $5 billion as Meta and LVMH stocks tumbled.

The S&P 500 is down 6.4%, reversing gains seen post-election.

Non-paywall link

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Couldn't have happened to a better group of guillotine dodgers.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They don't care. Stock prices only matter when purchasing and when selling. The day to day up and down has no affect on their direct worth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Foni@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

go woke go broke, no wait....

Go fash, lose cash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WinterDad32@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Keep It going y’all

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

and the American retirees who depend on their savings lost trillions to these idiots. A majority of those retirees voted conservative, but I feel bad for the ones who didnt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The only solace to watching all my retirement and investments get cratered is the fact that the assholes that brought this all about are taking the bigger hit.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just Covid economy 2.0 shifting more of everyones money into less hands, this way it can be Bidens fault it dropped and then Trumps when it regains

[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Not low enough. We can do better!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm sure they will be able to weather the storm. I bet they could find a way to get by on "only" a billion, let's say.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

Toadying capitulators all

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Damn that’s financially irresponsible. I’ve only lost a $20 since then

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Billionaires remembering why they were supporting the covert right winger Democrats instead of the Republicans. Because a veneer of illusion is needed to keep their empire running.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Damn Globalists at it again huh? LMAO 🤣

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good. Since they drive their wealth from using the value of their stocks as leverage to get loans, having these stocks collapse will not only make their loans smaller (not sure by how much), but they will have to pay using more of their dividends than what they expected

In short, they will get less money and it will cost them more to pay it back.

[–] friendlyghost@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

As Kendrick Lamar would say “it’s not enough”

[–] major_briggs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm sure they still have plenty of liquid assets to scoop up discounted stocks. Tax cuts will save conglomerates money, which they'll use for stock buybacks to inflate the worth of their stocks, which had already been picked up by the billionaires. This will reinflate their net worth.

Plus, and I don't know how or when this would be involved in the calculation of their net worth, but they're probably shorting stocks with insider info passed around Mar-a-Lago. Just a guess.

They'll be fine. The rest of us will continue to be screwed even harder. Fuck them billionaires.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They like the stock market going down, since it'll eventually go back up and meanwhile they still have billions available to buy up a lot more stock on the cheap while it's down.

[–] LucidLyes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

proof they're not geniuses

[–] pzzzt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crazy how you can tell from looking at Zuckcuck's face that he doesn't have a soul.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›