1261

Summary

Democratic divisions intensified as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized Chuck Schumer for supporting a Republican-led funding bill to avoid a government shutdown.

AOC called Schumer's decision a "betrayal," urging Senate Democrats to reject the legislation backed by Trump and Elon Musk. Pelosi called the bill a "devastating assault" on working families.

Schumer defended his stance, arguing a shutdown would empower Trump and Musk further.

The controversy sparked suggestions among Democrats that AOC might challenge Schumer in a primary.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 250 points 1 year ago

Challenge him. He's has no business being a party leader if he's as spineless as the Republicans who pushed this bill.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 year ago

She would have to be in the senate to take over senate leadership in the short term. For his seat itself, there's been house members - including moderates - starting to support the idea her primarying him when his term is up in 2028

Several members — including moderates — have begun voicing support for a primary challenge to Schumer, floating Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) as possible candidates, three House Democrats said.

https://www.axios.com/2025/03/14/house-democrats-angry-chuck-schumer-shutdown

[-] RainbowHedgehog@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

I don’t want him out in 2028, I want him out now.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He can realistically be stripped of senate leadership in the short term. Call your senators and tell them to support removing him from leadership

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Spinelessness is the chief defining quality of the entire Democratic Party. There are very few individual exceptions and those people need to start a new party. The US needs a real progressive party. The establishment Dems have made it very clear they won’t support a true progressive candidate, so what’s the point of bending the knee to these fuckers any longer?

[-] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

And honestly now is the time to do it. I have absolutely zero faith we will have honest elections in the next couple decades so splitting the funding between neo lib corpocrats and an actual progressive party for the people will not affect the crooked elections under trump since they won’t win anyway. The time for progress is NOW

load more comments (2 replies)

Take his seat TAKE HIS SEAT TAKE HIS SEAT

For real girl, you can take him in the primary. You can do it.

[-] CitricBase@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Primary Schumer, of course, but his term is up in 2028. AOC herself might be more focused on a separate race that particular year.

I would absolutely vote for her, and as much as I want it to happen, I’m genuinely not sure that’s realistic.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

He'll be 78 in 2028. He probably will bow out of politics by then to turn things over to a younger generation.

Wait, who am I kidding?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

Dude you had me going at first lol

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Headline in 2035: The corpse of Chuck Schumer is considering retirement from politics

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I’m genuinely not sure that’s realistic.

You're just saying that because an AOC win would conclusively disprove the DNC's mantra that Hillary and Kamala lost because of misogyny and not neoliberalism, so they'll be desperate to stop her from becoming the candidate.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

Schumer's argument is shit. They're going to go after government agencies with or without the funding bill. With the finding bill they get to choose. Without it they have to shut down everything. Passing that bill means they get more maneuvering room, not less.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

And with a shutdown the Dems would get to shout about 'the GOP shutdown' for however long it lasts which would also help to galvanize the public against MAGA.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Apparently it's only "compromise" when it aligns with corporate interests. When it's about the benefit of the people, it somehow becomes "extremism".

[-] VoodooAcupuncture@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I hope she primaries him. Vote all those decrepit elders out of office.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 year ago

schumer has been a sack of shit for about as long as I can remember.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

We will NEVER make progress by compromising with those who will not compromise with us in return.

[-] Debs@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago

AOC needs to form a new party or at least go independent with Bernie. I'd really like an alternative to the Democrats because I'll never be voting for them again.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago

No. She's on a path that will shape the democrats of the future. If she leaves she will become irrelevant, and she knows it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Start a fucking progressive party already

[-] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

As far left as I am, that would guarantee the Republicans would win every election until we get ranked choice vote

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

If Pelosi AND AOC agree on something, no one in the party has any business disagreeing. Schumer should resign over this moronic take.

[-] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what my first thought was. If Pelosi and AOC are agreeing on something, the other side is being really really stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Jefferies and Schumer need to step down. This is pathetic.

[-] psiderman@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

The only silver lining here is the remote possibility of progressive Democrats breaking out to form their own party. At least then the US will have a legitimate opposition party.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Cuck Schumer

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cloture is by no means a certainty yet: If your senator hasn't stated their position yet, there's still time to call them. With any luck, this will be the beginning of the end for Cowardly Chuck's leadership.

Edit: specifically saying "Vote no on cloture" tells them you're highly engaged and highly likely to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doug@lemmy.today 29 points 1 year ago

The naivety of the old guard feels akin to the council in Mass Effect 1 dragging their feet while Saren plows ahead unobstructed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChristmasIslandZone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

His vile cowardice is something I'm seeing people talk about, but the sheer stupidity of it isn't touched on.

CHUCK. HE IS GOING TO FUCKING KILL YOU! THE D NEXT TO YOUR NAME MAY AS WELL BE THE STAR OF DAVID ON YOUR CHEST YOU DUMB FUCK! DICTATORS DO NOT LET "OPPOSITION" PARTY MEMBERS LIVE. NO MATTER HOW HELPFUL THEY WERE IN GIVING THEM POWER!

Like are you fucking stupid?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Are we calling him Cuck Schumer yet?

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Democrat voters are tired of compromising. MAGA thinks they want to burn the US down so they can "own the libs" ... well let's fucking do it. Let's test their theory in the laboratory of life.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

About half the seated Democrats right now need to be primaried hard. How did we have a more coordinated opposition party during Trump's first term? It's worse this time around and they are showing absolutely no will to fight.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] upandup@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

When I first met her, she was slinging margaritas at a Mexican restaurant near Union Square. It was the best part of the time between classes I had at Parsons.

Sadly, because I lived in Brooklyn, I could not vote for her, although she has been one of the greatest young progressive voices in our government in nearly a century.

Saying that “I wish her all the best” doesn’t come close. I want her to be president someday, very very soon.

[-] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Screw Schumer. If there’s one thing that might bring some people away from Trump - it’s having the government shut down for no discernible reason for an extended amount of time. Could be the last shot at doing things here the legal way

[-] PeteZa@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

As she should.

[-] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As she should, and Every. Single. Member! Do better “America” or should I say “The illegal 1% trash”.

“Public servants cannot and will not use their public status to increase their own personal wealth”

SAID NO GOVERNMENT MEMBER EVER! They are not “for the people” they have more money than most will see and clearly they only care about themselves! Fuck ALL OF THE GOVERNMENT MEMBERS and actually clean the fucking swamp from greed and idiocracy! We deserve better!

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I saw that Schiff and Padilla opposed cloture and the GOP spending bill. Called their offices to vocalize my support.

[-] Viskio_Neta_Kafo@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Hopefully she will run for his seat in the future.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1261 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1353 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS