450
How did a dem get elected in Kentucky of all places?
Apparently Kentucky has a history of voting blue governors and red everything else.
That's really strange to me. TIL.
Symptom of gerrymandering perhaps.
Progressives tend to out perform in red states
That's truly surprising to me, but then again Bernie won over a Fox "News" audience. People do want good things for themselves when they aren't being fed packaged vitriol and hate and fear of the "other."
Bernie won Oklahoma in 2016 primary. We were a socialist state for many decades. Labor Omni vincit.
The only people who progressives lose to are the Democrats. Even in cases where they win a primary they get kneecapped by the DNC. Most US progressives come in with wild ideas like making the rich pay things instead of poor people. Making sure water is clean. Keeping the government out of our bedrooms. Governing rather than blustering. They also tend to be relatable as most have worked at least one real job in their life.
IIRC, his dad was a popular Dem gov.
Republicans struggle to win governor in Kentucky and Dems struggle to win anything else.
Kentucky’s largest city is staunchly deep hardcore blue.
Internet tells me this is Louisville. Not surprising that IF there is a blue city, it'd be a large city. You meet the most people who aren't like you in large populations.
Probably the turtle Mitch died?
As GOP has a super majority in Kentucky, they can override the veto the next time they meet.
Kentucky is weird. Kentuckian politicians need to tread lightly or they will get voted out. Kentucky is a red state that usually has a dem governor, they like a mix in politics.
If Republicans get too frisky they know they are out the door.
Gov. Beshear could absolutely be president if we still have free and fair elections in 2028. I, personally, wouldn’t be thrilled by a centrist Democrat bringing us further to the right via compromises where the left gets a shit sandwich. But he’s very good at being a politician.
We need to stop seeing governors and senators and representatives and saying, "they would be a great president!"
Instead we need to see teachers, co-workers, and neighbors and say, "they would be a great on the city council or county government or as a state representative."
We need to stop thinking in terms of only one chance of victory every four years and start putting people who care about us in places where they can help.
Of course, that means we have to be prepared to run, and that is hard as hell. So many of us are stretched to the absolute limit just trying to survive. I honestly don't understand how anyone can do it.
Would it be better? Or worse.. than what we have now.
I think it’d be better but not ideal. America obviously needs reforms but a 4 year reprieve from the dumbest dumbfucks in recorded history trying to annex Greenland and cut off funding for cancer research would be nice.
I’m in agreement with your comments, but this is basically what Biden ran on and it brought us here. I listened to his recent interview on Pod Save America and he is definitely cut from the same “move past our differences and bring America together” cloth. While I’d vote for that in the general, I’d volunteer for a candidate who promises accountability such as deporting Musk and investigating and impeaching Trump’s cronies who remain in office.
As a Kentucky resident, having Andy as governor is about the only good thing happening in this state.
KYGOP has a veto-proof majority which they have used often to overturn Andy's veto. The Republicans in the state are the same as everywhere else, unfortunately.
I have learned from direct contact our legislators don't really do homework on issues. No surprise. They basically work off 'word of mouth' and confirmation bias and news clippings to decide how they think.
Anecdote: the legislature passed an anti-tenure bill last week. The bill was sponsored by a rep whose son was upset his professor had stale notes. The rep decided to create a bill to mandate all public state unis evaluate all faculty every 4 years. This is a good idea. However, all state unis already perform YEARLY performance evaluations even after tenure. Most, if not all of the reps, had never even bothered to checked current university policies; "I never really thought to check. I just assumed since Rep X wrote legislation to mandate evaluations there were no evaluations." And then there was testimony to confirm in fact evals exist. And yet it made no difference even after evidence was presented evals exist.
Andy vetoed the tenure review bill but it will probably be overturned. The bill gives every uni board the power to remove the president and any faculty person, with cause. No criteria for cause, really, so it is possible cause could be "The faculty member made comments at a workshop about DEI which are not compatible with the university mission and thus the university has separated itself from the individual" which is their way of saying "fired."
Great governor who vetoed Conversion Therapy and anti-DEI and tenure review. Conversion Therapy was overturned by the Republicans. We'll see about the other two by Friday.
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
450 points (100.0% liked)
politics
31507 readers
2460 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS