this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
749 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagnarokOnline@reddthat.com 224 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I love that “No one can stand him” Is a good reason for expulsion. The human trafficking wasn’t enough.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fucking a teenager is why Republicans want to allow child marriage. His only crime to them was not marrying her after he trafficked her. That's forgivable. Being unbearable might possibly not be.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Rape, fraud, etc is fine because it doesn't affect them. Him causing the Reps to not vote uniformly and needing Dem help is a catastrophe.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His only crime to them was not marrying her after he trafficked her.

Oh, they don't care about that. Conservative men can molest and rape whoever they like with no obligation to marry anybody.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

And if he isn't a Russian asset, he certainly acts like one.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Of course not, Republicans only pay lip service to children, just ask Dennis Hastert

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 115 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No on can stand him

Get rid of him

He fucks an underage prostitute

crickets

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"fucks an underage" has a name. It's "rape".

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Well, statutory rape. I’m not trying to let him off easy, but semantics are important

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm also more fond of something like "Sexually assaulted a minor" or "engaged in sex with a child". You know, something that hammers home what he did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, you see....FUCK YOU!

-- Republicans

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Still get reelected

-- Republicans

!😭!<

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

"Underage prostitute" is more like "a trafficked minor."

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they aren't getting rid of George Santos they are not getting rid of Matt Gaetz. Honor among theives.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

I think the difference is that Santos is willing to go along with whatever the Republicans think will keep their majority. Gaetz is willing to burn it all down if it gets him extra social media points right now.

This isn't really about ethics violations, it's about a Republican threatening his party's chances of keeping power.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I can’t stand just hearing about him in the news, I can’t imagine what it’d be like to work with such a prick in office, knowing the guy is such a sleazebag as he is.

[–] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's kind of conflicting because I hate him, but I also love how much the Republicans (especially McCarthy) hate him.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has a very punchable face.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's just something wrong with his face. It's like some alien put together a human but they'd only ever heard descriptions.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seriously, he looks like the love child of Beavis and Butthead.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is like his facial features are clustered in the center of his face

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's nice that the House has its own Ted Cruz.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I like Ted Cruz more than most of my other colleagues like Ted Cruz. And I hate Ted Cruz." - Al Franken

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This guy tries to exert way too much influence for someone who only won his last race because both candidates were under active criminal investigation.

[–] hackitfast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Seems like the timing is a little off on the third criminal investigation.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The GOP made their bed with Gaetz, now sleep with him.

Or however that saying goes.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, the GOP is too old for Gaetz to want to sleep with them.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The average GOP senator is 65+ years old - that's about 10x too old for Gaetz to be interested in sleeping with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Let them destroy each other. I'll make popcorn.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one can stand Gaetz and his inner circle. They are fucking immature assholes.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Some of them literally, I suspect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

House republicans hate paedo gaetz in the same way everyone in America hates house republicans. No one can stand any of those pricks either.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Ahhh yes. Now his politics don't align with yours, his ethics finally matter. Classic.

[–] charles@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] somas@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one can stand him? For a lot of us he’s more the face of the Republicans than McCarthy or McConnell

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

this party supports and protects George Santos.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

He's positioning himself to be speaker, that's why.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I can't stand looking at his stupid face either

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

He looks like a big toe with a face.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just compile a list of things he accuses Democrats of, and you know what to look for in his case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bquintb@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sure Faux News will hire DollarStore Beavis right away.

[–] Disgustoid@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

Get it straight--he looks more like Dollar Store Butthead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they do and don't elect a Republican to replace him, and if they expel Santos and his replacement in the special election isn't a republican, there goes the GOP majority

Odds of the house GOP giving up their majority/control are exceedingly low. If there's one thing they'll prioritize, it's keeping their own power

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

How very...Late Roman Republic.

load more comments
view more: next ›