363
Andrew Tate told woman ‘I’m debating whether to rape you’, court papers allege
(www.theguardian.com)
Gollum lookin' ass mf'er
How can I be certain that you’re not a banana, though? Am I supposed to just take your word on it?
My resumé is in my bio
"I didnt rape that woman" says man who built his 'career' on teaching men how to subjugate and rape women
Makes sense ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Interestingly, only Tate is trying to say "that never happened" - his lawyers are instead opting to say that it happened too long ago to be prosecuted.
This man needs to have his dick shot off.
Or - hear me out -
No. Use an fruit peeler or cheese grater
Slice it off in very thin slices, like pepperoni
Once a week.
As a little treat.
Belt sander.
I feel like physical chemistry is severely underutilized. Sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, mercury fulminate, hydrazine, liquid nitrogen...so many possibilities.
NGL for the longest time I thought chemical castration was where they just dipped your balls in sulfuric acid.
How long before this rapist is in donvict's cabinet, overseeing deportations of citizens?
Nah, he'll be put in charge of women's health and reproductive rights.
His head is exactly like what you'd get if you crossed an incandescent lightbulb with a massive pile of shit.
I'm beginning to think this Tate fellow is bad news.
male youth role models nowadays...
The ugliest shit alive after the Techbros.
I prefer techbros to rapebros
Thing is that one doesn’t exclude the other 🥲 Actually, one of them is a certified sexual predator.
This is bad because of the implication.
His legal team argues the claims are time-barred.
Which is it, you didn’t do it or it’s too late to do something about it?
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
363 points (98.1% liked)
News
38985 readers
1831 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS