33
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

Getting f***ed by Microsoft.

[-] Xkdrxodrixkr@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago

I completely agree, but isn't this what the developer signed up for when they chose the MIT Licence? not that ms couldn't just ignore a GPL Licence, but still

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Forked works better when it comes to FOSS imo.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

We really need a license that works out compensation for opensource projects used by companies or anyone generating revenue from it. This stuff will keep on happening at the same scale it does otherwise.

https://postopen.org/ might be one of those licences and they need funding.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

In today's episode of What happens when you don't use the GPL

[-] enemenemu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Opensource

6636 readers
87 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS