33
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Getting f***ed by Microsoft.

[-] Xkdrxodrixkr@feddit.org 5 points 2 years ago

I completely agree, but isn't this what the developer signed up for when they chose the MIT Licence? not that ms couldn't just ignore a GPL Licence, but still

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Forked works better when it comes to FOSS imo.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

We really need a license that works out compensation for opensource projects used by companies or anyone generating revenue from it. This stuff will keep on happening at the same scale it does otherwise.

https://postopen.org/ might be one of those licences and they need funding.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

In today's episode of What happens when you don't use the GPL

[-] enemenemu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Opensource

6939 readers
33 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS