this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
112 points (96.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35873 readers
2091 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by a question I saw a while back, is it possible to make my data/online presence useless/undesirable to companies to purchase?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 171 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

E-commerce vet here. It’s easier just to try and not give out that data and to pay to have it scrubbed. But, this thought experiment is fun, so here’s how you’d make your targeting data complete trash.

—-

The most valuable thing about your data is your behavior and demographic characteristics, not your identity.

When you fill out forms, pretend your gender, race, and age is fluid. Also, pretend you’re nomadic. Then behave erratic as fuck online - pay for bibles, butt plugs, taxidermy, and PETA donations

Your data will be absolute trash. You’ll also be miserable because you’re going to be visiting the Amazon drop off center with gag balls and porcelain Jesus figurines every week.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

Your comment is fucking gold. Thank you.

Maybe you should plan better and get the ball gags in Jesus's size so you can drop them off at the local cult

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. Wiggle your mouse, introduce randomness into your typing, and read about things you’re not interested in. It doesn’t matter though as they’ll still sell your info.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Garbage in, garbage out.

[–] somedaysoon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think we will eventually see tooling for data-poisoning, and it will become a valid counter-measure for maintaining privacy.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They already exist. AdNauseam is a good example of that - it clicks advertisement links for you so it's harder to know what you're into.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus, if advertisers are paying for cost-per-click, it’s costing them money for each ad that is clicked on

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yes... but the money goes to the ad network tracking you and building profiles. So I would disregard the cost aspect.

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're still generating data that will be sold. I doubt most companies do any sort of deep analysis on the data when they can just throw it at an algorithm and let it do it's thing

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't fully agree with the approach, and I also think that generating no data is better in this case, but the reasoning is that the data being generated contains so much noise that it's useless for profiling. Or even poisonous, since it might create associations that don't exist (e.g. selling dildos to zealots, or advertising books on quantum mechanics to pet owners). As such, its attractiveness and thus selling value decreases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. People are always going to pay for your data even if you make it incorrect.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah this. Google has no interest in determining if your data is real or not. They don't care. They only care that the customer isn't aware of the scam.

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's impossible to make your data completely unattractive to purchase but using something like the adnauseum extension on your browser can make your data less useful when it has been purchased.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could go on and on about it!

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please. Proceed.

unless this is a quote/meme I'm not familiar with

[–] elvith@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

It just clicks on every ad you encounter. Ad nauseam.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It is a kind of quote/meme. Ad nauseum means on and on (literally until you get sick of it).

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It's a uBlock Origin fork that "clicks" on any ad it comes across off-screen.

[–] ogwillikers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

AdNauseum plugin combined with VPN and private browser mode.

It's an ad blocker that clicks everything.

[–] southernbrewer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I've kind of always wanted to use AdNauseum, but since I still depend on my Google account somewhat I'm hesitant to give them reasons to delete me, and I've settled for blocking ads and supporting rival services.

Has anyone had their google account banned over this?

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Private browser mode in many browsers disables plugins by default, and also doesn't do anything to stop trackers or data collection. All private mode does is keep your activity private from others who also have access to your device (e.g. family members, roommates), by not saving browser history/cookies/etc.

Also, VPN's can be helpful, but there are ways to "fingerprint" individual users behind VPN's by how they move their mouse and click speed and what websites they visit etc.. I imagine plugins like AdNauseum could help with that. It's a clever idea, I'll have to check it out - thanks!

[–] ogwillikers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Firefox can allow plugins in private mode. I only mentioned private mode because it ensures you're not logged in anywhere.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this chaotic neutral or chaotic evil?

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I contend that it's chaotic good.

[–] pezmaker@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is just my opinion, but I don't think so. I love the thought and wish there was, though. I think no matter what you do, it's still information about a potential user/customer and still tells someone looking at it about you. "Oh, we have information on about 4% of the population that wants to actively subvert our data analytics.". Obviously that's made up, I didn't bother trying to even guess what a potentially realistic number might be.

Again in my opinion, the only way to provide no value to data analytics is to not be a data point, and good luck with that. Best I've been trying to do is disable targeted ads anywhere I can, reset my identifier ids regularly on things like android tv where I can, and try to blast cookies anywhere possible. I don't know if it even makes a difference or just makes me feel better

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Its super unpopular on Reddit and even less popular on here but... Have my data, i dont give a fuck.

What are you going to find out? I'm a straight white man approaching middle-age. I'm into DIY, cars that were cool 20 years ago, music that was cool 20 years ago, cooking on my bbq and trying desperately to avoid becoming old AND fat. I'm wearing New Balance runners and cargo shorts RIGHT NOW. I've become a complete caricature of a "Dad".

You think you can find some embarrassing shit with my porn history? Nope, Ill tell you what my jam is for free. I dont care.

I'm already tighter with my money than a dolphins asshole. Put the prices up, I just wont buy it. I'm on a playthrough of a 22yo videogame on a pc I built with second hand parts because fuck paying $130 for a brand new AAA title.

What are "they" going to mine from me?

[–] somedaysoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You're thinking little picture, your data specifically isn't worth anything. Do you really think these multi-billion dollar companies are investing these crazy resources into data to see your porn history or sell you a different brand of toothpaste?

Your data with everyone else's data is worth a lot because they can use it to manipulate and control society. The Cambridge Anyltica scandal was a proof of concept... and you are not impervious to it. Some of us don't want to participate in fueling that machine, but congrats on bringing yourself to not care about it I guess.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the 1960s Alka Seltzer was in poor shape financially, they came up with a new slogan "Plop Plop, Fizz Fizz" because although 1 tablet was generally considered to be a sufficient dose, 2 is more. Its more effective and it sells twice as many.

In the 1920sa meat packing company wanted to sell more bacon, so they hired Edward Bernays a marketing exec. He asked his agencies doctor if a heartier breakfast could make people healthier, when he said yes the asked him to write to 5000 other physicians 4500 of them agreed in principal that yes, a more substantial breakfast of which bacon could be a part could make people overall healthier. The marketing company leveraged peoples trust of doctors to pound them full of salt and saturated fat.

People all of a sudden love to act like manipulating people came along with Facebook and we were in some fantastic consumer utopia before. Nope. Its just more of the same shit, just new vectors.

[–] somedaysoon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Strawman. Where did I claim advertising wasn't previously manipulative? I never made those claims. I'm concerned with the scale and effectiveness provided by these data pools. Don't equate misleading marketing campaigns with the level of scale and effectiveness this offers. Again, see the Cambridge Analytica scandal for reference. It's been proven that they can control a large demographic to sway an election. The means and effectiveness have never before been seen, and were made entirely possible by data collection. That's the reason the data is so valuable, and that's the reason so many resources are being poured into it. Eventually they will be able to use it to set opinion and control the majority of society.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we are talking about our "Data" very differently. When I say "fuck it, they can have mine" I mean the crumbs they can pick apart from someone who takes the most basic data privacy protections and who doesnt go on facebook filling out surveys and literally volunteering their information away. That demographic is their wet dream and they out number people who do understand this stuff by orders of magnitude. Im just not using TOR and HTML scraping to deny giving them so much as a single tracking cookie while hiding behind over 9000 proxies.

I use Firefox with most of the tracking protections turned on, I clear my cookies and cache. I dont fill out surveys or join mailing lists to get access to exclusive offers and I dont like or share every last thing I see on social media. But I still have facebook because I like marketplace and I still use google for searches because its handy and yeah I do turn on "private browsing" for porn.

I'm aware of what they are doing and can do with mass data collection, the real problem as I see it is that people like you and I who do understand are shockingly outnumbered by people who actively give them more than they could ever use, people who honestly beleive they couldnt be manipulated by what the algorithms feed them. Those people have been manipulated by basic psychology tricks since long before data collection and Analytica on social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the answer. Clarity and frugality. It doesn’t matter that they can make accurate predictions of your interests if you simply never click.

[–] sour@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

they wouldn't spend millions on ads if people were immune to them

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The expression "a fool and his money will soon be parted" or a variation of that was first published in 1573.

"A foole & his money, be soone at debate: which after with sorow, repents him to late."

If you cant go on facebook without buying some T-shirt for $40 because some targeted add knows you're all about Pickle Rick right now. The problem isnt targeted advertisement.

[–] pezmaker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You basically described the other half of me right here. I waffle back and forth between your view and trying to do something about it. I go back to feeling it's futile and doesn't matter anyway, before getting fed up with targeted ads again. Wash, rinse, repeat.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm aware of it, thats how I fight back.

Ive needed new day to day runners for months, the inner heel is shredded and the soles have very little tread but I havent seen anything I like on a decent sale yet. I know the prices on most of the shit I want and on all the shit I need.

Now my facebook regularly shoves adds for shoes at me 365 days a year. The last pair of new all purpose runners/training shoes I bought retailed for $150 - $200, I saw a targeted advertisement for 25% off and I clicked on it and I got a pair thats usually $160 for $120 did they win or did I win?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'd say they did, nobody actively advertises a product they don't want to sell, unless it's some type of loss leader.

Of course, you got cheap shoes out of it, so perhaps you both won?

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is what is valuable or not is up to you. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean they don't want it. What's perfectly legal and mundane today can be illegal tomorrow.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they outlaw blondes with big tits there will be a revolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Companies don't purchase specific user data they purchase datasets.

Like reddit will says "we have x amount of user and here is what data we collect on them" you can access this data for $Y"

So and then those companies use that data to show you personalised ads or whatever and do a fuck ton, like and obscene amount of data analysis on it and your habits to see if it was worth the cost and will renovate with reddit the price to access their data.

So one individual user going weird won't do anything. But if you made a ton of bots and made them act weird you might be able to make the dataset worth less. But honestly probably not that much as they have tools to filter bots and stuff.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unlink it from yourself. It's harder than you'd think. Use a privacy respecting browser with privacy badger installed and tor or VPN. Use generic credit cards. Use burner emails and phone numbers.

If none of your stuff is linked together and none of it is linked to you, it's not worth much, someone will buy it, but it'll be one of a billion useless records in a huge low quality dump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are browser extensions that fill up your data/presence with meaningless junk

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There’s definitely less valuable demographics but I doubt it would be completely worthless, you’d just be cheaper to advertise to.

I mean it might make it seem like you’re more valuable and then never buy anything, some companies would be paying more to show you ads but get less return, so you’d be costing them more money.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry it probably already is.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Meta and Google disagree.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use generated email/usernames everywhere I’m forced to login, in the hope they can’t connect all the dots. Don’t know if it works though.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I work in marketing, had an issue the other day someone did something weird by browsing our site with a personal email address and worked out the naming conventions we use to jump the sign up form for an in-person event and went straight to the thank-you page to get the details.

So then we had his personal email (which we didn't want!) and had to connect it to his work email in the CRM to connect his profile.

So, for the general use cases it would work, but someone that is trying to connect the dots probably could.

load more comments
view more: next ›