this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3538 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Railison@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe this could be fixed by a rule change. The national electricity objectives state that the system should operate in favour of lower costs.

I would assume that gaming the system to raise costs would run counter to that.

[–] morry040@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

A government-owned and operated battery could be an option. This would limit the extent to which the other providers could capitalise on the spikes in demand and provide a solution that is not aimed at generating maximum profits.

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe this could be fixed by a rule change.

I am doubtful. More rules have been added for years and years but the players still find ways of gaming. I suspect the core premises of the system need changing.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I do not disagree with you there! NEM is like a band aid pyramid now

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can someone dumb down the article for someone who isn't an electrical engineer?

[–] 18107@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Power prices fluctuate. If more power is needed than is supplied, prices will go up until either someone reduces their demand, or someone generates more power.

Some companies are deliberately waiting for extra high prices before they start delivering more power, and now they are doing the same with batteries.

They could be supplying the power much earlier and cheaper with batteries (unlike peaker plants that cost a lot to operate), but they just decided not to.

Batteries are not the problem, it's the companies who are using them for profit instead of for grid stability.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds like power generation and storage needs to be nationalised. Let the private companies fight over providing to the last mile.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I look forward to the SEC going right up their arse

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Renewables gives more opportunities for such companies to to do such things. Instability of grid is main reason. But I fail to see how it is related to batteries? They can do exactly same with just coal.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Power companies already have a playbook based on the 2001 California Electricity Crisis .

PBS Frontline has a good program on it called Blackout.

load more comments
view more: next ›