294

ICE is legally required to give them access to inspect it.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Fucking bring an army with you next time. You have constituents that will fight with you, use them. ICE cannot stop hundreds of people from storming these facilities if they are operating outside the law (which they absolutely are).

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Can't set a precedent of popular occupation... Dems would rather lose elections than give an inch to anybody who wants to see leadership held accountable

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

These 2 Democratic Party reps are literally trying to hold leadership accountable, fuck off with more of your both sides shit.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

I can believe those reps are earnest but not that their hands are not tied by their bigger party when it comes to real change.

This part is a personal observation but party strategists love embracing activist movements to mold it to their own “safe” ideals. Makes them look good and controls results.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

"these two reps" is not the party. The party is a corporate entity. The party is fine with it.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

"The party" is not trying to gain access to the building.

These two reps are.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's the problem

[-] entwine413@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What the fuck are you smoking? This article is literally about the Democrats trying to hold leadership accountable.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] BMW_stick@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Trump sets the tone as a traitor by announcing that anything he does will just keep happening until someone stops him. All the idiots who work for him simply follow that mandate.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
294 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31342 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS