423
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 195 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary," Padilla said to Noem, which prompted several men to physically push him out of the room. It was unclear who the men were as several were dressed in plainclothes."

Sounds like assault to me...

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

And kidnapping, kidnapping in my state can be when you force someone to “a different location beyond their will”

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 51 points 1 year ago

Video shows they were pushing him before that statement.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

They also put him face down on the ground and handcuffed his hands behind his back.

[-] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Damn, that's pretty dangerous, right?

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago

He was detained!! They handcuffed him!

What is this forcibly removed nonsense. They handcuffed a senator who wanted to know what DHS is doing in HIS state!

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 93 points 1 year ago

It's a GOOD THING Democrats did NOT make the Law Political! OTHERWISE Republicans might Weaponize the law AGAINST Democrats!

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I do wonder if peoples minds have changed on stacking the courts and getting rid of the filibuster... I know a lot have changed their minds on the 2nd.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Haven't the dems recently started some kind of initiative for an amendment to prevent court packing?

[-] Absaroka@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., denounced the incident on the Senate floor. "I just saw something that sickened my stomach. The manhandling of a United States Senator, we need immediate answers to what the hell went on," he said.

Good to know old Chucky is still around. Haven't heard a peep from him in a while.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago

You know the answer to what was happening Chuck. It’s an authoritarian regime. The question is, what are you going to do about it?!

Nothing, because you’re trash. Fucking step down already.

Don't worry, I'm sure he and a few other democrats will be along shortly to censure Padilla like they did Al Green.

[-] valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 year ago

Chuck doesn't do anything useful. In fact he's one of 47's enablers. New York (greetings from) is having a tremendously hard time removing him, and bootlicker Gillibrand.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Best of luck to you New Yorkers on that, those two are poison.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Hey! Be NICE! It takes a LONG TIME to Fundraise enough Money to WRITE a LETTER!

Presumably he's been enacting his master plan now that Trump's approval rating is below 40 percent. Surely that wasn't all bullshit.

[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Manhandling"?! That's not man-handling, that's assault. The Senator was assaulted. Chuck Schumer is such a spineless lick-spittle, even when it concerns the physical assault of those in his own Party.

[-] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 year ago

Fucking general strike, now!

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most Americans are too chicken shit to give up a few days of work. I mean, look at how these 9 to 5vers bitch and complain when people protest and it inconveniences them. They've swallowed the propaganda so hard that they applaud the police for arresting and abusing protestors. I have very little faith in my countrymen.

[-] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

I support a general strike but I'm a doctor that works primarily in an underserved community filled with many immigrants (illegal and otherwise). I would support other people striking, but I feel like I couldn't possibly stop working because my role is a lifeline for workers.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are other ways of striking than reducing service. For example you could stop all insurance paperwork and offer your services for free for the duration of the strike. Or anything else that makes management mad and the bosses/shareholders lose money.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 12 points 1 year ago
[-] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing this. I'd heard of this before, but being reminded of it bolstered my spirits a little.

[-] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So I work for a small community hospital. I have zero input on billing. My hospital is so small and broke that we end up being subsidized by the city/state most years because so many of our patients are uninsured and can't pay for our services. I can't make the hospital operate for free because I have zero influence on billing.

I do volunteer at free clinics part time.

[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

This is why safety nets are important. In US you can lose your job, not get unemployment and lose access to doctor.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

And this is why the right has been systematically dismantling all safety nets for decades.

This is the end game...

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Many people can't miss a few days work without significant financial implications. Billionaires and corporations have us so underwater that we have no choice but to make a big stink where we can and voice our concern, with the occasional weekend march.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll dare note that in the beginning of the previous century financial implications of such a strike for a worker were not just that, and it involved also possibly serious physical damage (without easily available surgery and care) and detention.

I would really like to find it in myself to do something like that, it takes a certain state of mind and a certain feeling in the air, because how do you start when nobody is yet doing it.

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd say part of the difference is that, at this point, the billionaires have left us with just enough to lose. I'm sure the risk of physical violence was still daunting, but when you have nothing left to lose then the prospect of physical harm somehow seems preferable to continuing with the status quo. That seems like an easy thing to say, but I've been there before.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes, of course. That's also the distinction of Russia's situation from more classical kinds of fascism. Bad things happen, but the regime doesn't put them under your nose. Intimidation happens, but there are no public executions Nazi-style. Propaganda happens, but it's boring and one would think ineffective, except it still sticks, similar to advertising, - they've learned some lessons. Nazis were more interesting and imposing, but less efficient. This is state of the art.

Same with today's monopolies, oligopolies, rotten electoral systems, censorship.

Everything has been optimized to the last cent. Not the good old days, when the bad guys were generous with impressions.

Reminds me of Boussenard's sentiment on new uniforms in his children's book on the Boer war - no more nice glares and colors, just khaki everywhere - a symbol of efficiency, because camouflage now is treated seriously enough.

Like Intel's tick-tock. Worker movements and fascisms 100 years ago were the "tick", and now is the "tock" - boring, depressing, deadly efficient.

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Very well put; this is exactly what I'm talking about.

[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago
[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago

It's not that they're chicken shit. They aren't even against Trump's policies.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That, too. Even a good portion of Dems support this stupid fucks actions and "policy." And the word policy is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

[-] xyzzy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you serious? Most Americans are scared of losing their jobs and being unable to provide for their families, including caregivers for elderly parents. Many are only a few missed payments away from having their vehicles repossessed or being evicted and becoming homeless. Some have ongoing health conditions that require insurance.

If you have nothing to lose or you have a safety net and can stop going to work, great, good job. Most people aren't in your position.

[-] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Many service members are in the same position and depend on Uncle Sam to pay their bills (and, ya know, to stay out of jail for derelicion of duty or insubordination)...hence why it might be a tad difficult to "remember their oath" and stand up against vaguely illegalish orders, which might morally preserve their soul, but crushes their ability to live. Only bringing this up because of comments in other posts related to the NG and USMC in LA, but I see a close parallel of maliciously manufactured helplessness to self-advocate.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's an intentionally designed system, so that everyone falling out of line by themselves would hurt only themselves. It's the point of governments and militaries than everyone can be replaced.

It was always so.

Strikes are supposed to be "suicidal".

The problem is that western cultures after 60s manufactured expectation that there's no such thing among necessary ones in life. That you live for feeling nice, comfort, good things, peaceful politics. That risking your life to make a statement won't be required from you. That was initially counterpropaganda to communism, I think.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 17 points 1 year ago

In Poland the senators and congressmen have constitutional right to intervene in the administration. They can basically show up to any public office and say "I'm from the senate, what the fuck are you up to?". They not always get access to the "backstage" but arresting them for it would be unimaginable. They also have immunity so detaining them would be illegal. How weak the US system is in comparison is mind boggling. Entire opposition could be put in jail tomorrow and nothing would be done about it.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

"There's no recording allowed in here."

The entire world should be a witness to the insanity of what's going on. Record everything, even when they say it's not allowed.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Huh. The But Muh Freezed Peach "free speech absolutists" on the right are saying what on this? I bet they are saying sweet fuckall.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Turns out they just need to be on the winning team. Their entire existence is so frail that the only way to cope is to hate a group of anyone.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
423 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31160 readers
2181 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS