875
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 161 points 1 year ago
[-] AugustWest@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alligator Auschwitz

Bum-Fuck Buchenwald

Crocodile Kraków

DeSantis Dachau

Everglades Esterwegen

Gator Gross-Rossen

Hillbilly Hinzert

MAGA Mauthhausen

Redneck Ravensbrüch

South-Florida Sachsenhausen

Trump Treblinka

[-] BossDj@piefed.social 17 points 1 year ago

The sad truth is that most Americans, especially Trump voters, are likely, maybe, to have heard of Auschwitz, and even then only having heard of it and not knowing what it is, but have never seen those others in their life.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm admittedly a little better read on the subject than most Americans

Off the top of my head, I'd probably be able to rattle off Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Krakow, and Treblinka off the top of my head.

Small side rant, my mom's side of the family is Polish. Most of my mom's grandparents (my great grandparents) were off-the-boat from Poland, I know at least one of them never became a US citizen. We have some family still in Poland, we're not exactly in regular contact but we know more or less how to track each other down when we want to.

Years ago, well-before I was born, my mom's family went to visit those relatives. There is honestly probably enough material from that trip (and from when a relative from Poland was able to visit the US back then) to write a pretty decent short book, or at least a couple solid blog posts. Lots of interesting comparisons between the state of things in the US and Poland during the Cold War to be made.

One of the things they did was visit Auschwitz. Seeing that was something that definitely shaped my mom's worldview from there on out. To her credit, my mom already had her head screwed on pretty straight before that when it came to racial tolerance and such.

She would occasionally tell us little bits about it when we were growing up, not like she purposely sat us down and gave us a Holocaust talk or anything, it was just something that came up occasionally when appropriate

I don't know if this was ever an intentional choice by her, but she never really said who built and ran the camps, who was sent there, why, etc. she pretty much just left it at they were places that existed, and that people did various kinds of horrible things to other people there.

As far as I knew, it was all Polish people (not unlike myself) doing horrible things to other Poles, for reasons I couldn't really wrap my head around. It wasn't until we started learning about WWII and the Holocaust in school that the details of who and my started falling into place.

But by that point, I think the key message about people being capable of immense cruelty towards other people had really been firmly planted in my mind. The fact that one side or the other are Jews, Poles, Germans, LGBT people, Romani, black, white, Hispanic, Christian, Muslim, Palestinian, Hutu, Tutsi, Armenian , Uyghur, etc. isn't really important compared to the idea that this is something that people like me could do to other people who are also just like me, and I need to be vigilant to make sure that doesn't happen.

[-] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Lizard Lichtenburg

Florida Flossenbürg

Miller’s Mittelbau

RFK Ravensbrück

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Here are some scary facts about Treblinka: it was in operation for about 18 months, was staffed at any one time by about 25 German officers and soldiers and 100 civilian workers, executed people with the exhaust from a single salvaged Russian tank engine, and murdered about 900,000 people in total. People tend to assume that the Holocaust was a massive industrial-scale operation that used up a huge fraction of German resources, but in fact it was a remarkably low-cost operation for the most part. Even the transportation aspect largely made use of supply trains returning otherwise empty from the front. If Hitler had not been stopped militarily, Germany would have had no technical difficulty in carrying out his goal of literally exterminating the nearly 200 million people of the Soviet Union.

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 78 points 1 year ago

"Alligator Auschwitz"

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 year ago

THEY'RE SELLING MERCHANDISE LIKE IT'S A GODDAMN AMUSEMENT PARK! HUMANITY HAS FAILED! WE ARE A FAILED SPECIES AND WILL PROBABLY GO EXTINCT FROM THE SELFISHNESS AND GREED OF A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE POPULATION

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Can you order one of those massive solar flares that will kill global power grids? Might give us a little bit of a reset.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not for the first time in American history, but hopefully for the last time.

People give me shit for getting hung up on specifics, but remember that the majority of Germans really didn't know what was going on at the camps till the very end of the war when they were shown film evidence of camps being liberated.

The literal card carrying nazis tried to hide it better than what is happening now, when members of the party openly "joke" about feeding 65 million (the number of Hispanics, not immigrants even if legal were included) to alligators, there is no logical reason to believe they're being honest about what is really happening there.

Alligators have stomach acid strong enough to dissolve bone, it takes a while (months?) but eventually there will be no trace of a body. They could literally be tossing them in a swamp to dispose of bodies and because of how shadowy arrests have been, I doubt they're keeping good records of inmates.

People are going to disappear

People give me shit for getting hung up on specifics, but remember that the majority of Germans really didn’t know what was going on at the camps till the very end of the war when they were shown film evidence of camps being liberated.

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

but hopefully for the last time

That's what they said last time. "Never again" etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

DEATH CAMP!

People will actually die here. The reason for death is irrelevant.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I’m convinced this place is designed to kill people. I mean, they defunded noaa, cancelled FEMA, and built a hastily constructed, non-storm rated facility and dropped it in hurricane alley. It’s already flooded once.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe so.

Considering the death of 20+ innocent kids via a flash flood in TX, who knows the multi that would drown at this camp.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

And they probably won't even tell the public about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago

AND IN THE DAYS FOLLOWING THE OPENING OF THE CONCENTRATION CAMP CNN WAS FOCUSING MOST OF ITS ATTENTION ON THE TRIAL OF FUCKING P DIDDY

load more comments (2 replies)

I don't actually want to say this but the USA was founded on genocide. It literally killed the native americans to take their land, same as hitler attempted to do with the polish people.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Hitler’s whole plan was modeled after American genocide, Manifest Destiny, and eugenics.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Eugenics in America predates the third Reich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Also Jim Crow laws

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] modus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

"That wasn't genocide, it was an upgrade. They had no civilization. We rehabbed those savages." –my grandfather, probably.

[-] throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If you sell them guns as you're killing them, you get to call it a war and not genocide.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago

And...? Oh that was your whole point? Oh.

Yeah dude, we fucking know.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That doesn't mean we should keep doing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

francesca fiorentini called it Alligator Auschwitz, which i like because it keeps the alliteration while conveying the concentration camp idea.

edit: i heard it from her first but many leftists seem to be calling it that; my bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

HAS ANYONE NOTICED I'M ANGRY?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 year ago

The disillusioning thing, besides the grim, efficient-looking guards and their rifles, was in the faces of the prisoners. Under a smiling sky, there was not a smile in the 2,000. They looked sour, grim, sullen, sad or merely apathetic.

Gee, can’t imagine why.

[-] toppy@lemy.lol 25 points 1 year ago

Where is united nations organisation ? Why are they not saying anything against USA policies ?

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Trump should be charged with crimes against humanity

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Yes, they can veto, but others should at least be going on the record and REQUIRING the US to use its veto.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The UN has no power against the United States. The UN was setup to favor western powers and ideally prevent them from having direct war with one another again. Until the US bombs another Western country in the UN there is so reason to look to the UN for anything but empty condemnation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

HOW WILL THIS SHIT END? HOW DO WE END THE FUCKING HOLOCAUST?

[-] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 year ago

Killing a shitload of Nazis seemed to help last time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Somehoe35@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago

I DON'T KNOW BUT I'M PISSED OFF WITH YOU. FUCK THESE EVIL PRICKS. IT MUST END

[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Call it something that implies the administration collectively has small penises. They seem to be insecure about that.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago
[-] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Airhorn.wav

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

2,000 INMATES GLOOMY

I didn't realize how long the NYT had been like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

And like the Germans in WW2, the Americans are also starving and beating these people, but they’ve outsourced that shit to nations like El Salvador to obscure the atrocities.

[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

we can't upvote this enough

[-] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago

Had trump not pretended to want to reopen Alcatraz and everyone rightly thought he was a fool. I imagine how outraged everyone would have that he actually build this concentration camp in Florida. Instead it was reduced to a mere pun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Wasn't "concentration camp" a euphemism, too?

I mean, most people know people are not doing any "camping" at such a place, but....still.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

I call it what it is, a Cruelty Centre.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jonesey71@lemmus.org 11 points 1 year ago

Those who deny life and liberty to others don't deserve it themselves. They should all keep their oath to the constitution or they should die fighting against it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
875 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31286 readers
1678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS