148
submitted 1 year ago by Gsus4@mander.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago

Robber Barons are back in style!

Why is anyone questioning why people want to murder the rich and support social programs more and more. You have just sit and think how much people will take before they absolutely slaughter these fucking pieces of human trash.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 year ago

They throw people in concentration camps without any process, much less due process, get giant tax breaks while taking away people's healthcare, layoff thousands of workers while getting a generous bonus, dump toxic waste in the rivers, use 45% of the corn grown to make ethanol that doesn't solve anything, and say there's not enough room for solar panels.

But don't post Luigi memes because that's inciting violence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 year ago

This guy's upset you won't break your back to make him richer.

What a piece of shit.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, you can go fuck yourself with your 7 day work week.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I don't get is...they can just hire more people to do the work and expand the company? When you consider this, you realize that they're just asking people to work 40% more without an increase in pay (hence hiring more people is not an option)...then they call it "productivity gains".

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Then they'll complain when no one wants to work those ludicrous hours and they'll sing one of the greatest hits of all time:

"nOBodY WaNts To woRk ANyMorE"

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Stebbings, founder of 20VC, a firm managing $650 million in funds, advised founders on LinkedIn last month that “7 days a week is the required velocity to win right now,” to compete with startups in Silicon Valley and China.

Just from that sentence you can tell the guy leads an impoverished life in ways that won't be fixed by money. But he's going to spend his life chasing money because he can't imagine what else to do with it.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just like all the other psychopath techbros, he'll take from everyone else, make everyone miserable, wallow in his superiority, and be a general scouge to Earth in an attempt to fill a void that will always just expand anyways. At the end of the day, they'll always have the most money and still be the poorest people in the world. No amount they exploit from the rest of us will satiate their ravenous, everlasting hunger.

They'll punish us, who they envy for our ability to live rich lives with emotions that they will never experience.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

If we're lucky, they'll realize it and kill themselves.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This sounds like hes just describing an oversaturated market

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If there's one thing that businessmen and investors demonstrate an appalling lack of understanding of, it's economics.

[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

These are the people when some folks say “you can’t buy happiness” are referring to because they will never be happy.

[-] doctortofu@piefed.social 45 points 1 year ago

Good - nobody needs billion-dollar startups. The line doesn't have to co constantly go up forever. We don't need to constantly improve productivity and do more for less. Fuck that and fuck this "debate".

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago

I remember reading about a hotel in Japan that has been open for over a millennium, and IIRC it’s owned by the same family who has owned it for most of that time, and that’s their only business. We need more of that: steady-state businesses that operate but don’t pursue permanent growth.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 39 points 1 year ago

"Debate"? What fucking "debate"?

Someone suggests something comedically fucked up and it's now a debate?

Shut the fuck up and sit down, you VC cunt. No one wants to hear your clown-show takes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, some places have been trying out 4-day 8 hour days, and have found that they retain competent staff who have fewer accidents and make fewer errors, increasing company productivity while reducing wage spend.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'd rather pay for clear-minded hours of a worker, rather than near-burnout hours. But the guy doesn't care, he's trying to compete by saving in wages...at the frontline of tech. It makes no sense either way.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I've told bosses before they can have either my early hours or my best hours, but not both. There's so much waste in our work lives trying to fit to some picture of productivity that isn't actually real. We just play the parts we're required to while getting nothing done.

[-] runiq@feddit.org 29 points 1 year ago

Your 'work' and my 'work' are different, Boy Wonder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

JFC, I loathe douchebags like this so very much.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Jokes on him: some of the laziest jobs I’ve had were for successful startups.

Hell, I work for a startup right now and spent the last three hours in my hammock watching YouTube.

I get paid for results, not time

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago

Must be nice. I've worked for a couple myself, and all I constantly felt like I was being exploited the entire time.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I’ve worked for a few where I was being exploited. One paid me by letting me keep the laptop they bought me.

Then some accountant called me and asked if I still had it.

I said no.

Luckily as you do this more you learn what to look out for. The one I work for now is pretty great.

[-] Mingusdynasty@lemmy.myserv.one 21 points 1 year ago

Can we just agree as a society that people like this are ruining the world? Maybe if they were treated like the enemies of humanity they are, and exposed to 1% of the misery they cause, it would be a less common genre of shitty person?

[-] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Screw all Venture capitalist. They destroy everything they touch. Why should a worker give all they've got just to get screwed in the end?

[-] derry@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago

Says the dude who counts golfing, diners, other events as "work"

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You'll get four and you'll like it.

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

The rich are ripping the copper out of the walls of society before it all comes crashing down. They burn out employees, throw them away and hire fresh ones. Who cares, they're not planning of any of this lasting much longer.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

We need to tax these fuckers till they bleed.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's the only nonviolent way to control them.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

If it is your startup, you are free to work 996 mode. Don't expect your employees to do the same.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah you can fuck yourself with a rusty pitchfork. I'd prefer death over those shitty hours.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Given how much billion dollar start-ups are ruining our world, wouldn't that be a good thing?

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He might be right, but if he wants me to work more than 5 days a week then I would expect to be compensated accordingly. Otherwise he can fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CEOs 996 is 9 hours per week, 9 days per month, 6 months a year right?

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I love how we're simultaneously being told that AI is this wonder invention that's streamlining everything but also that we're apparently supposed to now work 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.

Either AI works as advertised, in which case let it do most of the work and let us work less, or AI doesn't actually help at all, in which case fuck off and stop trying to shoehorn it into everything.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean this is just how you get any real talent with any real mobility to use that mobility to leave.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Isn't the point of working hard so that you can take it easy eventually? These psychos never take it easy, the suffering is the point for them.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It can be that or it can be the satisfaction of doing useful work well. Venture capitalists don't do useful work so they don't know that satisfaction. And they don't know what else to do but chase money because they lack the capacity to appreciate life as it is and are probably scared to just stop, in case they have to face the void in their heart. Hence their unstoppable, narrow-minded craving for more money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago

But it literally did.

[-] raef@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Check out the bags under this guy's eyes. He's not even thirty

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be so mindful of how i spoke, if I had a Backpfeifengesicht like him.

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago
[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

996 work culture isn't for everyone - or even most people. But if someone wants to start a company doing something they love and work that much, I say go for it. I started a company, albeit I only work 60/week, doing something I love and working with my family. It isn't the only way, but is the way that works for us. 🤷

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago

That’s fine since you get the upside of the business as an owner. A salaried employee may not. Equity may be offered too, but i have seen enough situations where the capital investors get a payout that leaves those with lesser shares in the cold.

In short, fuck these people, pay me to care and I may choose to help build their business.

One cannot eat pie in the sky.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with that, it just sounds like these people think they can commodify that kind of dedication in exchange for much less than what you got creating your own.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
148 points (96.2% liked)

politics

31115 readers
2033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS