539
There is exactly one person's life that Trump cares about, and that says everything that needs to be said about this topic.
I am absolutely positive that this is a direct result of Elon Musk's little bitch-fit earlier. He tried playing a card he didn't hold in his hands. He assumed he did, and then when his bitch-fit didn't get him anywhere the administration quietly decided to torch any and all evidence and just pretend it never happened. He played a card that Trump didn't want him to play, and so they took it straight out of his deck in the most blatant-to-anyone-with-two-brain-cells manner possible.
I thought, before this, that there was a slim possibility -- however slim -- that Trump merely associated with a child rapist, and Elon was simply pulling a(n admittedly half decent) plausible "gotcha" out of his ass. Now I know with certainty that Trump is a child rapist.
With the testimony against Trump from people who claim he raped them when they were children... Let's just say that if Trump was a Catholic priest, they'd have already moved him to a different country.
Pedophiles lives. Pedophiles lives will be destroyed. Or people happy to associate and socialize with pedophiles.
Truth told? I'm not gonna lose a wink of sleep over their lives being destroyed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
GOP: "Pedophile lives matter".
Republican voters: "We love pedophiles now!"
How come this logic doesn’t hold water for people who live in poor neighborhoods or areas with gang activity? Or for migrant workers from Mexico?
Clues you in to who they consider “people” and who they consider wage slaves that exist for their benefit
So, you can destroy normal peoples lives, people who've paid taxes and followed the law, but rich pedos are above the law, got it. America, you're cooked.
"[Trump] said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct. They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another," O'Reilly began. "If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. The media doesn't care about context — so you can't do that. You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be."
Oh, yeah, Bill, you're totally right. Lemme just put down this pitchfork and torch and go right along with NAW I'M JUST KIDDIN EAT THE RICH
You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.
- Donald "Russia, if you're listening" fucking Trump
Technically, that’s true. A fair bit of investigation would help, but friend Patel isn’t in much of a hurry, now is he? And this was never an issue before either, when it was - say - the Clintons’ heads that were gonna roll, why is that then?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Isn’t that the point? To destroy the lives of pedophiles?
Yeah, that’s the point. They’re child molesters.
Trump Doesn't Want to Release Epstein Files Because (rich) People's Lives Will Be ~~'Destroyed,'~~ inconvenienced with having to spend money on lawyers when a few of their wives divorce them Ex-Fox Host Says
Real “Brock Turner-ism” happening here. Be sad that some rich people might get in trouble.
The lives that mattered (the victims') have already been destroyed. Why are we protecting these people?
conservatives went from "would somebody please think of the children" to "would somebody please think of the pedophiles"
load more comments
(2 replies)
If you rape kids your life should be destroyed though
The only person trump means when he says “people” is himself lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Two possibilities:
-
The Epstein files are full of Magastanis.
-
There was never anything in the Epstein files and the Magastanis lied and 70 million idiots believed them.
load more comments
(3 replies)
LOL, he must be talking about himself, since he never gives a rat's ass if someone else's life is destroyed - see for example, the outcomes of DOGE, ICE....
Trump could rape a underage girl on camera and nobody would care.
He almost certainly has.
Unlike their victims who’s lives do nothing but thrive
/s
You know whose lives I'm concerned about? The children whom these monsters raped. Does anyone care that their lives were destroyed?
If you choose to rape children, don't complain that your life is "destroyed" just because you have to face consequences. You did this to yourself and deserve every consequence you receive.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Fucking GOOD! Let them be destroyed! These are the sorts of people that NEED their lives to be destroyed!
waaait, but apaaarently they said those files "did not exist" 🤔
People? You mean his whole shit stain Administration? Those people…?
Ah so the rapists, pedophiles, human traffickers, dredge of perverted society..... Those people will suffer.
Never mind the girls, children, victims of the rapes and coersion and trafficking.... They are doing just fine?
In the maga mind, the victims dont even register, unless they were told to be offended or concerned, they are unable to have their own thoughts
Really wish that somebody would leak these papers
I'm just happy that they say "ex-Fox Host" because it implies that people don't know who Bill O'Relliy is.
load more comments
(1 replies)
As they absofuckinglutely should.
Yeah, I really feel for those poor innocent millionaires who associated with a known pedo totally in good faith.
load more comments
(2 replies)
What about the lives already destroyed?
Yeah, he's in there for sure. Probably several times.
load more comments
(1 replies)
These are demons that we are calling human, the politicians and businessmen that are ruining our society and causing misery simply because it is their nature to do so.
...so one set of lives can be destroyed because they have no purchase on society, the other cannot because it does?...so rape and abuse is allowed for the wealthily endowed?...
load more comments
(2 replies)
yeah, "people"...
load more comments
(2 replies)
Good guy Trump looking out for the poor, helpless rapists.
Uh, huh? And?
We are talking about the sex offender / pedophiles that Epstein theoretically had dirt on, right?
cough-cough-BULLSHIT-ahem-cough
I thought there was no list?
First and foremost his.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
539 points (99.3% liked)
politics
31403 readers
2409 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS