OSR/NSR Tabletop Roleplaying Games

1016 readers

1 users here now

Whither Reddit? In the meantime, here’s a place to chat up old school revival (OSR) and new school revolution (NSR) style TTRPGs.

My name is Todd aka Hexed Press and I am the current caretaker (have I always been the caretaker?). Here are some other places to find me, if you are so inclined:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HexedPress@lemm.ee

Against splitting RPGs into OSR, DIY, Indie, Story Games, etc. (campaignwiki.org)

submitted 1 year ago by kensanata@lemm.ee to c/osr@lemm.ee

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here I am arguing against the split into the various sub "camps" of current RPG culture. I used to believe in this divide, too, but now I'm convinced the differences are just talked up and don't really exist except as tags, not inherently better or worse than tags such as "solo", "rules lite", "gonzo" and all the other ways of splitting it up. The tags remain important for some people to "find their crowd" but that's far weaker than saying that these are the most important splits in RPG culture.

My actual favourite category would actually be "64 pages or less for rules, setting and adventure"! 😅

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] luigirenna@infosec.exchange 3 points 1 year ago

@kensanata@lemm.eei the reason why on reddit I did not hang out "generic" rpg spaces is because by sheer volume DnD 5e players dominate the conversation, and a large part of the DnD 5e conversation (at least on reddit) seems to focus on mechanics optimization, meta, and very DnD-specific things I am not interested about.

OSR/NSR/Indie spaces are more interesting for someone like me that prefers talking about adventuring, and the less boardgame-y or MMO-y aspects of the game.

To clarify: I have zero elitism or gatekeeping feelings towards DnD 5e, it's a good game that opened up the hobby to many many people, and it's a blessing, however I like having a space where to talk about rpgs that are not it.

[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I generally agree. The problem is you probably never know in advance if a new group will have enough action to sustain itself or if it will die.

My assumption is that the primary reason for a split is that some group is invisible in add larger group because it is smaller. For example, in a general „rpg“ group it will be mostly about D&D 5e. Everything else is barely visible. So someone will try to create another group. Zero problems:

How to split? There are multiple dimensions and „not D&D 5e“ is a stupid name. One could split by system, by genre, by publisher, or whatever. It is effectively a random choice.
Due to the invisibility in the large group, nobody knows how many will follow into the splinter group. That is the risk.

[–] GrumblingGM@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That is true. I do feel like whenever there's a general RPG group, it usually breaks down quickly into every post either being related to 5E, or complaining about 5E.

I stopped visiting RPG on Reddit because it felt like half the posts were just complaining about 5E, and while I don't disagree with those posts, I would rather talk about the things I DO enjoy.