this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

If he wants to fix this problem he helped create, then he should resign today and let Biden appoint a liberal replacement. Shit, he should be advocating for an expanded court to counteract the blatant ratfucking of the last 7 years.

But he won't do any of that. Because he's a partisan hack.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, well, too fucking bad. If you're going to be horrible people, expect to be called on it.

Yeah, don't like being criticized for being partisan hacks then don't make decisions that are clearly partisan. However it's way too late in any of that since most Americans already think the Robert's court is illegitimate and unqualified thanks to these conservative partisan hacks in the court.

[–] VictoriousStalemate@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Lol. It's not "judicial overreach" to stop an unconstitutional spending spree by the President. That spending must go through Congress.

Wahhh! The Court is following the Constitution and I don't like it!!!