this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7950 readers
1256 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 year ago

Despite being unemployed, professionals told Fortune they’re refusing to take calls with bots, calling it an “added indignity” and a red flag for company culture. Still, stretched-thin HR teams say it’s the only way to handle thousands of applicants

Which is another red flag yeah?

[–] paulbg@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

remembered some "innovative startup" spamming me with their shitty AI interview for like a week. just shadow these mfs folks.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a hiring manager, I swear, the shit we sift through is insane. Not sure how to disqualify the horde without also leaving the living out there to get devoured.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no problem with them. It's just a way to cut the massive chaff. Foreign outsourcers, idiots applying to every posting - I get it. And the bonus is that you hear the actual voice. How many times do you find the interviewee can't string together 2 sentences? Or drifts off into unrelated topics? Or can't pronounce the skill they are a supposed expert in?

I find that being able to work with whatever the employer throws at me is an important job skill. And interview skill. That other folks give up immediately is a big boost to me.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

We use workable. It filters out a LOT. even then, they get through. i'd say we get to about 2-3 video screenings a month, and of those 1 make it through every 3 to 6 months for a video interview.

we've been trying to hire for this position for a year. still nothing.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Every time I look at a position or apply for a position and get a hint of AI, I stop pursuing the process. I'm not wasting my time talking to a fucking chatbot; I'm trying to put food on my table in exchange for actual hard work in the field I've worked in for a decade here.

I am not interested in talking to a chatbot.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

If its a talking bot, you could probably have some fun and talk it into some naughty conversation.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

If LLMs are smart enough to judge me, I am sure chatbots are smart enough to do the job. They should let chatbots do the job they were hiring for.

[–] Gelik@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Boring dystopia: Employees automatically generate and send out applications with an LLM Agents. Employers in turn let another LLM agent review those, send out interview invitations based on ??? and conducts interviews.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"risk staying unemployed"

What does that even mean? Going homeless by not able to pay rent or starving because no money for groceries? What a weird euphemism.