1177
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 153 points 1 year ago

This makes sense if cruelty is the point.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 65 points 1 year ago

Cruelty, yes, but let's not forget grift.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

And cognitive dissonance. Gotta redraw those lines in the sand!

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Not just cruelty. Someone else in another thread pointed out this is exactly what you would do if you're afraid of a civil war. Now, you've got an easily defended government center, and a large amount of people out in the streets that any opposing force will have to fight through in order to get to any of the governmental buildings (though really, we're only caring about the WH). Additionally, you have an oceanfront escape route if shit goes poorly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 78 points 1 year ago

It’s never about the cost. It’s always about the hate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Same as it ever was.

The Cruelty Is The Point.

They'd put all the money in a literal pile and set it on literal fire before they'd just help people who need the help.

If I had to characterize the US govt when it comes to helping its citizens I'd compare it to Immortan Joe.

Immortan Joe: Do not, my friends, become addicted to water. It will take hold of you, and you will resent its absence!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

I'm very supportive out housing the homeless as a fix, but to be clear math is on a per-day basis, it isn't some sort of long term fix.

I hate these stupid math headlines that don't actually make any sense.

Current deployment costs are around $1.1 million per day, housing all of those people in shelters at $45 per person works out to something like $250,000 per day.

This math calculation entirely ignores the fact that there aren't enough shelters to actually do that.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Would other costs go down over time? Housed people don’t need emergency healthcare nearly as much, and with a permanent address that would open doors to a lot of things.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I can’t believe you would forget the interests of the shareholders here

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 27 points 1 year ago

It's a simplistic calculation, but it does seem that often doing the right thing ends up cheaper in the long run. It just doesn't benefit certain groups, so it's not an option. If a million a day was applied to not just pay for sheltering, but to find solutions there wouldn't be a problem to throw authoritative measures at, or use as a reason to tighten security and control. They don't want to fix the problem, it works for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sznowicki@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

When communist were forced on Poland by soviets in 1945 one of their tasks for the next decade (that continued until 1980 collapse) was to build houses and give it to people. Other tasks were less nice like killing opposition, but housing was indeed how they decided to spent the resources.

US could start a massive communal housing programm on federal budget. They chose not to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Cruelty is the point. I really don't think this country will ever change in any positive direction, sadly.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The point is to 'test run" military protection around the White House.

[-] joker125@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This. They know that none of this is sustainable on a the grand scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago

Nominative determinism strikes again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago

Even without the occupation, housing-first costs less.

The End of Policing.

According to Need

[-] zululove@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Look up how much we send to Israel to conduct a genocide

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

countless after countless studies showed UBI will eliminate homelessness and wasteful bureaucracy to keep watch of welfare recipients and cheats

Everyone: Nah, we don't do that here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

What a waste.

[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People say these facts, but not the base fact that all these facts prove which is that this lifestyle and the narrative created is completely bullshit and we are being farmed. That's our reality but it's so fucked up nobody wants to believe it. Psychological warfare owns the path of society.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sure but helping the homeless would make them actual Christians following the teachings of Christ and we know that now what Republican Christians do.

[-] SwimmingInTheeStars@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Trump only ever claimed to be Christian to sell bibles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Breaking news Trump is a moron

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

What would happen if we just fixed stuff. Like, the wealthy can still have it all, but then stuff wouldn’t be broken. Just like, fix things. When is someone going to step up and just pay to fix stuff?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The man is world famous as a money mismanager

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

What is actually happening to homeless people in DC at the moment?

The article is a bit vague. Some arrests, tickets?

I imagine far worse when the national guard is being called to specifically address this issue. Overall I am hearing little about the fate of the ones being targeted by the grey shirts. Does anyone have more info for an interested party?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] abies_exarchia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

I think the top 2 comments i see ascribing this to ‘hate’ and ‘cruelty’ are missing the point. This literally is better for the capitalists’ bottom line. This can be entirely attributed to profit. The threat of violence (homelessness, etc) that the working class is kept precipitously close to powers this whole machine. If everybody was housed the threat of poverty would have less material consequence. Cruelty is not the point, in this case. Neither hate. Simply profit. Which in many ways is much more cold and insidious

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago

president "epstein" trying very hard to shift public focus away from himself, and the fact that ghislaine being on work release isnt gaining more attention is something.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Eric Adams Syndrome: Spend $1,500 to save $1

[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

"Showy? Useless? Expensive? Hurts poor people? Sounds pretty good but are you sure there is no way to put a yuge golden TRUMP sign on it?"

Trump (probably)

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Trump is a moron.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He was never that good at numbers, that Donald guy.

[-] wavebeam@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The cruelty is the point

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
1177 points (99.1% liked)

News

38985 readers
3055 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS