75
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Google will ask all Android developers to verify their identity starting next year.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] mrbn@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Sounds to me like this is a workaround so that Google can maintain control over who gets to release apps now that they can't do it by locking the apps behind Google Play. I wouldn't be surprised if being verified also includes some kind of fee.

I doubt its about a few dollars from developers. They'll say it's about contacting devepers. But I think it's really about control over who can publish apps, force them to agree to weird T&Cs and allow Google to exclude people.

[-] vikingtons@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

ravanced, magisk, newpipe etc

[-] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

This. And obviously to ban all the things like adblockers, NewPipe, custom browsers, etc that give people any kind of relief from Google's digital slavery.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

its a threat to people using browser forks thats for sure.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 17 points 1 year ago

I will be purchasing a phone that runs free open source Linux. This whole Android thing sucks ass.

[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 8 points 1 year ago
[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 year ago
[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 2 points 1 year ago
[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 2 points 1 year ago

The way I understand what /e/OS is, it sounds like it should be able to not include this check

[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, as I still type, there’s no liberated deblobbed ROM. /e/OS, like every custom AOSP fork, is dependent on leaks &/manufacturer provided ROMs. After Google silos AOSP ROMs, all forks will not be able to acquire updates downstream.

Linux Phones, are not alternatives.

[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 1 year ago

But if the forks are able to tear out the gapps, shouldn't this "cert" check go with it? I understand that the check would have to be in the installer app. Even if it's a part of launching mechanism, it should also be possible to tear it out

Linux Phones, are not alternatives.

I'm sorry, I don't follow. AFAIK GRUB did not need to get some blessing to get installed on UEFI. So Linux Phones should be free of big tech gatekeeping. This exchange we are having here is on technology community, not privacy (where I would get your point)

[-] majora31@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Looks like we need dedicated hardware. /e is phones, graphene phones etc then.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The fascist US obviously won't do shit, but Europe ought to outlaw this blatant anti-trust violation.

[-] mormund@feddit.org 6 points 1 year ago

Will just F-Droid have to do this or any app developer? If it's the latter, I guess might as well go with an unofficial OS...

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

If the phone ships with Play Store, Play Services, and other Google Mobile Services (GMS) apps the requirement will be enforced, it doesn't matter which source you use to get your apps. They claim to provide an exception for "student projects", but per their post, it's yet to be created.

[-] mormund@feddit.org 11 points 1 year ago

Welp I guess Android and iOS are becoming more alike. Just not in the direction I'd have liked.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If this goes through, I'll move from my S23 Ultra to a flipphone the moment it gets outdated, and also build some portable computing device from a Raspberry Pi CM.

[-] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

7221 readers
101 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS