this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
168 points (98.3% liked)

News

38763 readers
1812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has audaciously claimed virtually unlimited power to bypass Congress and impose sweeping taxes on foreign products.

Now a federal appeals court has thrown a roadblock in his path.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled Friday that Trump went too far when he declared national emergencies to justify imposing sweeping import taxes on almost every country on earth. The ruling largely upheld a May decision by a specialized federal trade court in New York. But the 7-4 appeals court decision tossed out a part of that ruling striking down the tariffs immediately, allowing his administration time to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling was a big setback for Trump, whose erratic trade policies have rocked financial markets, paralyzed businesses with uncertainty and raised fears of higher prices and slower economic growth.

Which tariffs did the court knock down?

The court’s decision centers on the tariffs Trump slapped in April on almost all U.S. trading partners and levies he imposed before that on China, Mexico and Canada.

Trump on April 2 — Liberation Day, he called it — imposed so-called reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit and 10% baseline tariffs on almost everybody else.

The president later suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries time to negotiate trade agreements with the United States — and reduce their barriers to American exports. Some of them did — including the United Kingdom, Japan and the European Union — and agreed to lopsided deals with Trump to avoid even bigger tariffs.

Those that didn’t knuckle under — or otherwise incurred Trump’s wrath — got hit harder earlier this month. Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff, for instance, and Algeria with a 30% levy. Trump also kept the baseline tariffs in place.

Claiming extraordinary power to act without congressional approval, Trump justified the taxes under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act by declaring the United States’ longstanding trade deficits “a national emergency.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 47 points 11 months ago

Nothing changes for now, the appeals court left the tariffs in place pending a SCOTUS appeal. This has been going on for a while and it's just another turn of the crank.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the uncertainty in the meantime will drive away even more manufacturing and suppliers.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's even worse. Because the Orange Jackass axed the duty-free import exception on small purchases under $200, bunch of countries have just said they're gonna stop mailing shit here because they have no idea what the hell the rules are anymore.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 11 months ago

The private operators for packages still work, but then you'll often pay a lot more for shipping than the actual product. Large corpos are looking to set up warehouses with bulk import and local fulfilment centers. Small businesses are out of luck. And with the rules changing all the time nobody wants to bet on setting up local production. Christmas this year is going to be really expensive in the USA.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

Yep. Im seeing a lot of people i follow on socials getting screwed. They had packages already on the way or had just purchased something only to get an email saying 'tough luck' basically.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The supreme court reinstates them next Tuesday?

[–] null@piefed.au 12 points 11 months ago

The same thing that usually happens - they just get their stacked SCOTUS to rubber stamp them.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is there any working mechanism for collecting the tariffs yet?

[–] lemmysquezzy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Most of the major carriers can. It's the new usps tariffs that's still not setup with third party vendors for tariff collection.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 1 points 11 months ago

Collecting? Yes.

Paying back out to the government? Not at all.