460
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 208 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is just a lone wolf. Hell, there isn't even remotely a pattern of violence aimed at Confederate pundits. There is not even stochastic terrorism aimed at Confederates.

Who the fuck do these sister-fuckers even want vengeance on? We don't even know who the shooter is yet and there are no prominent figures on the left who are doing the stochastic terrorism thing (unlike much of the right).

For all we know, it's Charlie's jilted gay lover that shot him.

[-] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 88 points 1 year ago

But apparently the truckloads of dead children are totally fine

[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

That's what Republicans love, whether it's dead children or raped children, it's their favorite!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

They don’t care. Anyone who revels in his death might as well have pulled the trigger, I guess.

Guilty 🤚

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 160 points 1 year ago

So, if the shooter turns out to be some Nazi shitbag, these right wingers are going to war with them right? Of course not, because they don’t actually care about what happened to Kirk, and have no problem with violence happening (as evidenced by all the goddamn violence they are always doing). They just want to take advantage of an opportunity to do more violence against what they perceive as the other team. They’re sociopaths with no moral framework other than self-enrichment, self-aggrandizement, and ends justifying means.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Best case scenario for planet Earth is if they find definitive proof that Kirk's assassination was jointly ordered by Putin and Netanyahu.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 43 points 1 year ago

They will still find a way to blame the left

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 year ago

All they want is an excuse to do exactly what they've always wanted to do.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

To be fair they respond to most things the left does with calls for violence. They want to commit violence over trans existence.

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I’m countering their violence with continued trans existence.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 70 points 1 year ago

I think that they (the right) need to look into this organisation:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Oh! Oh! You mean just like when Trump tweeted a picture of Chicago exploding and said "Chicago is about to learn why it is called the Department of War"?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 61 points 1 year ago

It wasn't war when one Dem politician was killed, one was attempted. And a gubernatorial assassination was attempted?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kometes@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

This the same far-right that couldn't wear a face mask when 1,226,351 of us were dying of Covid? I am terrified, I tell you, terrified.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

WAR WAS HERE WHEN REPUBLICANS WERE PUTTING PEOPLE IN CAGES, SETTING BARBWIRE IN THE RIVERS, BURNING PROGRESSIVE BALLOT BOXES, FREEZING MEDICAID FUNDING.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 year ago

They’ve been getting more and more violent for 9 years, so I really don’t see how this is a change. They literally tried to overthrow the government.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 40 points 1 year ago

Of course, that's all they got. What, are they going to demand bipartisan cooperation and a commitment to end gun violence? Get real. They threaten violence every time the sun rises. It's a good idea to remind them that murdering who they perceive as the American Left won't be as easy as the Nazis crushing the Jews. There will be strong resistance, and it is already starting.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 38 points 1 year ago

Like the little bitches weren't already out there bombing and shooting. But one professional troll cops irony and they're losing their shit

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 year ago

Just the pedos creating a distraction from the Epstein files. GOP voted down their release yesterday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did they forget all the right wing terrorism they’ve already been doing like attempting to kill Pelosi and nearly killing her husband among other things

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rayyy@piefed.social 33 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, a difficult long distance sniper shot has the marks of a professional hit, plus he got away. Sounds a lot like an ordered hit on a not too valuable target for a political purpose. Maybe a distraction from the Epstein files? Is it too much to ask to wait until we know a lot more before killing innocent people?

[-] sausager@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

He just happens to get shot on the same day the Republicans voted to not release the Epstein files 🤔

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

I don't get it, if he's such a good guy, why are they sad that he's in heaven with Jeebus? Don't they believe that's where the good people go?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

So... The thing that they were already doing?

OK.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago

They call for violence every time a non-white/cis/straight person breathes. This isn't news.

[-] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

...these fucking people.

Just shut up and go away already. Just move to Russia since you like the taste of dictator balls so much.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

There are more of us than you.

Despite common belief (at least in my area) we have more guns than you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] philosloppy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Kirk wasn't even a politician, he was a talking head. And not even an A-lister like Shapiro or Jones. These guys are looking for an excuse to become violent and it didn't take much.

At this point, I would be shocked if the far-right responded with anything but calls for violence.

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They have no idea who the shooter was. They literally don't care. They are ready to just immediately blame the left, even if none of us had literally anything to do with it. Bunch of bloodthirsty psychopaths.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago
[-] lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

WTF is this??? It's like Wired built a manifesto for right wing nut jobs instead of reporting a balanced story. What the actual fuck?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 19 points 1 year ago

as opposed to the calls for peace they've been doing up until now. did someone get neurolyzed this morning?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 19 points 1 year ago

Between this and WSJ claiming there's antitrans inscriptions on the ammo, this is almost certainly a false flag, meant to incite just such a war on LGBTQ+.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago
[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago

war is here

And they just now noticed? Quite low IQ maneuver considering it's they who started it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
460 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31602 readers
3286 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS