this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
63 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

50375 readers
570 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

codeberg is such an obvious choice, i have no idea why people don't immediately switch from GitHub

[–] snooting@wetshav.ing 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They don't allow for private repos, so it's a non-starter for companies unless they want to self-host.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What? All my codeberg repos are private.

If you do not want anyone (apart from your fellow collaborators) to see your repositories, mark your repository as "Private".

https://docs.codeberg.org/collaborating/repo-permissions/

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are terms and conditions for private people too regarding this (read next two sections): https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#before-i-start-using-codeberg

I love codeberg but can't move my private, non-foss repos there. FOSS repos for sure though.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

it's very understandable though, and 100MB is a lot of data

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

it's a lot of code, not a lot of data. If any repo has binary files you'll most likely need to store it somewhere else as there's not even an option to pay that used storage.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah no I'm not complaining about their decision. Quite happy about it! I just comment this in every "github alternative" comment section when codeberg is brought up for the sake of codeberg too because we don't want to flood them with people who would also set up private repos that break their ToS.

I have an account and contribute on Codeberg but keep my private, non FOSS/not-sure-of-license-yet repos somewhere else (currently gitlab).

[–] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

they also have a limit of 100 repos, so I can't even migrate everything I have on github

[–] SethranKada@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

Check out Forgejo, it's what codeberg uses as far as im aware. They're the only ones even attempting to put the fediverse into git

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

NOTE: URLs written in italics are unofficial/self-hosted instances of their respective version control systems.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't know if GitLab counts as alternative (it has no bullshit according to Brave Shields, and AFAIK they're independent)

[–] fajre@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Brave has already had several leaks and a history of selling data, that’s why I switched to LibreWolf.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] pfr@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago

+1 for Sourcehut

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Selfhosted Gitea ?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Radicle is really worth checking out https://radicle.xyz/

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I recently came across another forgejo instance: https://lavaforge.org/. Seems decent.

[–] fajre@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

interesting!

[–] m33@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

Probably codeberg, or gitea instance somewhere

[–] poldy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Same as in the other thread, I'm going to recommend fossil-scm.org

Works for me.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I run my own Gitea instance at https://git.benetou.fr/ but I admit didn't look much at the federated aspect, yet.

Sadly I just checked https://forum.gitea.com/c/federation/10 and despite few attempts, e.g. https://nlnet.nl/project/Gitea/ and eventually potentially upstreaming via forgejo https://forgejo.org/2023-01-10-answering-forgejo-federation-questions/#will-gitea-also-gain-federation that does not seem to be usable right now.

I'm checking https://forgefed.org/ which I learned about via checking federation on Gitea and it looks nice, in theory, but until I see an actual list of instances federated together I'll just applaud the effort from afar.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago
[–] dont@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

https://radicle.xyz/ is not fediverse, but P2P

[–] elias_griffin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Fossil requires its own download client (not git) and like the other guy said Forgejo only accepts certain licenses, Gitea is Google which is obviously a no-go.

Gogs abandoned, Kallithea abandoned.

Realistically that leaves GitBucket https://github.com/gitbucket/gitbucket and Tuleap https://docs.tuleap.org/install.html

[–] elias_griffin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Can’t edit. Gogs I’m happy to see did receive security fixes 3 months ago. Also Gitea being a no-go…get it, no-go…hahah.

It is good and proper to hate Google services.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Gitea is Google which is obviously a no-go.

Please explain how "Gitea is Google"