this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)

News

38864 readers
1834 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reproductive rights and justice leaders had warned that after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court decision that demolished Roe, anti-abortion activists would be emboldened to demand such prosecutions. These warnings were well founded. As new research released Tuesday by the advocacy organization Pregnancy Justice reveals, over the two years following the decision, hundreds of people were prosecuted for their pregnancy outcomes. The group identified more than 400 cases in which prosecutors charged a person for crimes related to their pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or birth. Using media reports, public records, and direct information provided to the group, the report offers a snapshot of who has been charged in this new legal environment. The most common charges, by far, were related to child abuse, neglect, and endangerment. In all, among 412 defendants (some of whom faced multiple charges), 399 charges alleged substance use during pregnancy; 29 alleged lack of prenatal care; and nine allegations involved obtaining, attempting, or researching an abortion. More than half of those charged were white. The vast majority of all charged were low-income.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20251003114336/https://newrepublic.com/article/201132/grim-report-policing-abortion-pregnancy-post-roe

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

29 alleged lack of prenatal care;

So not only were they being punished for losing their baby, they were being punished for being too poor to afford healthcare.

What has this world come to?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Not to mention "researching abortion"

That's fucking thought crime right there

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The conservatives are doing everything possible so we all get to party like it's 1499. But with smartphones and AI, I guess?

[–] snpalavan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

oh no, now they're coming for the white people too!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Well, the poor female ones will go first. It's always been like that - the poors should be miserable and if they were to do what humans will do and engage in something like (gasp!) sex, they should have to pay the price, by gawd. Now the rich, on the other hand: since their god has blessed them with money, they are obviously worthy and any shame associated with sex or its outcomes should not be pinned on them, oh no.

But they'll work their way up through the various classes, I am sure.

I don't know if Thiel's money will protect him from a modern version of the night of the long knives. I don't know if Stephen Miller being in the modern version of Jews for Hitler (a real thing that existed) will protect him in the long run, either. Very few people will qualify to be pure enough for a radical right wing xtian white ethnostate, but a whole lot of dumbasses think they can ride that tiger anyway...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

But wait?

All the Christ-lovin' god-botherers were all saying that Roe being repealed doesn't really mean anything, women will still just be fine, it was all about love of "the babies", that talk about Gilead and the Handmaid's tale was being way too hysterical, etc....even though ending women's freedoms was something the conservatives had a hard-on since Roe.