this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

17566 readers
88 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like to start a thread for people to share what they're using for search now that quality & relevance of results are in steep decline on all major search engines.

I'm doing this for selfish as well as altruistic reasons, mostly because my "stack" has gotten a lot less useful over the past year, because the search engines I use repackage Bing, whose ability to return relevant results at all seems to be cratering.

My (shitty and getting worse) solution:

  • DuckDuckGo as default search engine mostly for bang commands, in my personal opinion DDG's relevance has been shit for its entire existence
  • StartPage as where I direct most of my general searches (by appending !sp on DDG)
  • currently attempting to tune the Ublacklist extension to remove most of the clickbait results; this works, but it's not easy to set up if you don't use Google which seems to be the main search engine the developer tests with

The problem with this approach is that increasingly, Bing simply doesn't return hits on topics I know should have plenty to choose from. Filters only solve the issue of too many hits, not too few.

BTW I tried Qwant, but their claim of having their own index seems to be bullshit, the results look like repackaged Bing to me. And, the UX is terrible in Firefox for Android.

I'd love to hear suggestions.

tl;dr pls share what you are doing for web search these days in order to work around the rapidly declining quality of major search engines

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I use Kagi. Paying for a search engine isn't something that I ever saw myself doing, but I do honestly believe it's the only way they can exist that means the users are the customers instead of the product.

[–] Steve@communick.news 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Second for Kagi
Not only solving the customer vs product problem. It really does have a number of great customizable features that easily make it the best.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Also can be purchased via crypto for maximum privacy. They also offer something I eould call "AI Studio", where you can easily switch models, and the chats are fully private and don't share context. You can customize which domains to promote, demote, block, pin, and they have some nice bangs functionality.

I stopped paying for all streaming platforms, and Kagi is hands down the best bang for my buck as I already use it every day (in contrast of binging a show every two months).

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I meant to say in the post but forgot... I'm currently housing insecure, food insecure, etc... so I'm looking for a non-Kagi solution. But it's definitely on my radar to try when I do have $ to spare.

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Sign up and you get 100 searches for free, plus unlimited !bangs. Worth making an account for when you can't find what you're looking for on the others.

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago
[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Here is a list of alternative (meta-)search engines:
Swisscow
Qwant
Ecosia
DuckDuckGo
SearXNG
MetaGer
Leta by Mullvad
Mojeek
Kagi (Paid I think)

Das all I can remember rn.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SearxNG has been bad lately, so just put priority words first to get around it.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hwat exactly do you mean by SearXNG being bad? Cause in some sens that isn't even a thing. It's a meta search engine.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The results do not match the search. Often it's a bunch of Chinese. I just switch to Swisscows. When SearXNG gets ironed out, I'll probably switch back just because I like that it's federated.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You fundamentally misunderstand the techbology you are using. SearXNG is not federated, it is a selfhostable meta search engine. If you have an instance that has a lot of chinese results, then that instance's owner hss chosen chinese search engines. SearXNG can be considered to have the exact same results as other engines do. You can only receive Google results, Brave, what have you, but it being a meta search engine, you can also mix results. It can also search other indices than search engines for the modern web, such as wikis or published papers. SearXNG is "ironed out". It's feature complete.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I forgot that I might have switched instances. Thanks for the explanation. I might try to revert back to the one I was using and see if that helps.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

If you have firther questions, you may also dm me.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

currently attempting to tune the Ublacklist extension to remove most of the clickbait results

This is one of the killer features for me in Kagi. The ability to buff or debuff websites in the results. Whenever I encounter an AI slopsite, I immediately block it in Kagi and it'll never show up again. Other websites are annoying, but occasionally return good results, so I'll just debuff them in the search results.

Arch Linux forums? Guix mailing list? Max buff!

That being said, I do wish there was a more open source friendly alternative or a search engine that didn't just rebrand Bing or Google results. Maybe SearXNG or Mojeek?

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

That feature of Kagi is so awesome and I wish other search engines would implement it.

[–] AnAnonymousApe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Just try Kagi and you'll never look back.

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

I forgot to include in the post that I'm too broke for Kagi, otherwise I'd have tried it already :(

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Last time I checked Kagi didn’t have an option for people who just do a few searches a month so it ended being too expensive for me.

I might have to check again though😇

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Just going to give Wiby a shoutout because no-one else has. More for curiosity / surfing than research, but you definitely get unique results.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also use Kagi. It has the option for AI but doesn't shove it down your throat like other providers.

One feature I especially appreciate from Kagi are URL redirects. I can have it automatically replace parts of the URL from any search result. For example, I have YouTube results redirect to Invidious, and Reddit redirect to redlib, without me having to replace the domain myself

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have my own SearXNG self hosted Instance but I'm probably going to switch it to 4get today. I've just noticed it getting worse and worse over time. slow, bad results, or just randomly starts 504ing when everything else (forgejo, vaultwarden, navidrome, jellyfin, Akkoma, etc) on my server continues to work fight.

Tried some 4get instances and it's just so damn snappy and quick.

[–] oOAlteredBeastOo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I noticed the same bad search issue a few weeks ago. I tried several other instances from searx.space and they all gave bad results. I reverted to DDG. I'll have to give 4get a shot.

[–] kixik@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't know if your complain about serxng is something you'll eventually get with 4get. Whatever works at any time. See google and other search engines had been playing awful to searxng. At some point google will notice 4get instances and will take on them as well. On searx[ng] on the side one can see what has been suspended, denied, timed out, etc.

Time wise, 4get allows for only 1 engine at a time. searx[ng] allows for several no wonders it can take time. BTW the user can choose any of the engines per search they want. That of course can take more time. The point is that right now all search engines have taken it on searx[ng], and options are welcome. Self hosting is working better maybe because the search engines don't feel threaten by it.

The good thing is to have alternatives.

BTW, I thought google found the way to finally get rid of invidio, but it seems there are a couple of instances still working. Good !

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did end up switching from searxng to 4get on my server yesterday as I previously stated I would. It's much better. way faster.

if you want you can try it out on my instance https://4get.andmc.ca/

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you know what happened to Searx? Did the big engines create algos to throw it off?

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 1 points 9 months ago

no clue. I just noticed it getting slower and worse not only on my instance but a few others thus the reason I switched.

[–] Zicoxy3@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I use SearXNG self hosted, and I see 4get....

[–] redhilsha@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

You know, I've tried using instances of searx, and it was never satisfactory to me. Often it would show "no result" found. IDK what I've done wrong. I wanna know how you guys use it.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yandex is deptessingly good

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Oh hmm... their image search is second to none but it never really crossed my mind to try the regular search, I'm not even sure why.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

For Lemmy, I guess 22 comments counts as a mega thread.

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I switched to using Ecosia a while back, and have had no problems with it. The results are generally relevant enough for everyday use, and it feels good knowing that my searches contribute (at least in some small way) to reforestation projects.

It’s not perfect, of course.. It still relies partly on bing’s index, but the experience has been stable and consistent for me. I also like that the interface is clean and privacy-focused without trying to upsell the search experience.

In the past I’ve tried alternatives like StartPage and DuckDuckGo, but Ecosia has quietly become my default. It just works well enough without much fuss, and that’s something I really appreciate right now.

[–] xpey@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Rooting for ecosia with it plans to create their own index, but unhappy with the direction they're gping specially with AI

[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

I feel the same way. I’d love to see them move toward developing their own independent index. I also really hope they stay true to what makes them different and don’t get caught up in the whole “AI-everything” trend. Search doesn’t need to be artificially padded or reworded by a chatbot, it just needs to be genuinely useful, transparent, and connected to reality. If Ecosia focused entirely on building a clean, human-centered search experience powered by their own index, without the AI noise, I think that would be far more valuable than following the same path other major engines have taken....

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I'm gonna comment on my personal experience with a few search engines.

  • Startpage I stopped using because, and it took me a while to notice this, the searches aren't included in the URL. This means if I want to bookmark a startpage search for later or find a startpage search in my browser history I can't. This is a dealbreaker for me.
  • Qwant didn't have advanced search tools of any kind, and it also didn't work in Singapore (where I occasionally set my VPN to).
  • Mojeek ... is not ready yet.
  • Kagi I tried for a bit but I'm not paying a subscription to an American company for search.

Ultimately I ended back up on ~~Duckduckgo~~ Startpage. I think perhaps we should go back to web directories instead of search engines.

[–] nkk@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

still a ddg user myself but theres how you solve your startpage problem

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We could use the fediverse the find answers today as well? If we could index and search across all instances and threads?

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea what you just said.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

OK. Will keep it simple: build a search engine around the fediverse (lemmy etc.).

Instead of using Google to find results on reddit..

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

That is not equivalent to a web directory and is a function that can already be effectively done with duckduckgo and startpage.

EDIT: Nevermind, Startpage at least doesn't allow wildcards.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 10 months ago

No its not equivalent to a web directory. I just proposed an alternative.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is start page sleezy? I tried it and it's good.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I use Startpage. I don't know much about it.