267
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump berated Mike Pence, calling his then-vice president a "wimp" during their final phone call on Jan. 6, 2021, hours before Congress certified the 2020 election of Joe Biden, according to Pence's previously unpublished notes included in a new book by ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl.

According to court filings, had his case against Trump gone to trial, special counsel Jack Smith planned to use the handwritten notes -- hastily scribbled on Pence's day planner -- as evidence to document the hours before Trump allegedly directed a violent mob to storm the Capitol.

"You'll go down as a wimp," Trump told Pence about his decision not to block Biden's certification, according to Pence's notes about the call on the morning of Jan. 6, just before the president took the stage at the "Save America" rally on the Ellipse. "If you do that, I made a big mistake 5 years ago," Pence wrote Trump told him.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 137 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm soooo glad we're getting another book about this shit instead of it ever being released to the public, you know, when it fucking mattered.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

That's Joe Biden's legacy. He didn't put Trump in jail. That's what he'll be remembered for.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 10 months ago

💯

The Supreme Court literally ruled that a President cannot be held accountable for activities that are part of Presidential duties, and all he had to do was lock up Trump and run out the time on the court system just like Trump does on whether or not locking up Trump fell under "Presidential duties." He literally had the solution handed to him on a silver fucking platter and pissed away the opportunity to use his position and powers to save anyone.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

He could have locked up Trump without stretching the law in any way. The fucker is guilty as hell on so many counts, it just would have been a matter of actually putting some effort into prosecuting him.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Putting Merrick Garland in charge was a huge mistake. AFAIK, the only reason he was picked as a Scrotus nominee was because he was so moderate and milktoast the it would make the republicans look absurd if they blocked him. Biden did it for similar reasons, but assumed the Dems would be in power for a lot longer I think.

If only the Dems could understand that fascists don’t worry about looking absurd, because absurdity is a common weapon in their takeovers.

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

How does this continue to be a talking point when they made it extremely clear the ruling only would be applied to republican decisions?

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 18 points 10 months ago

They literally made that ruling when a Democrat had 2 years left in his term. They told Biden that the president is above the law, but Biden chose to sit on his hands and do nothing.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All Biden had to do was do it at the last minute and run out the legal clock that rule that it was wrong just like Trump has done with the judicial system.

Sure the supreme court would make moves to take up the case almost immediately and rule against Biden. Just like with Trump, even if we proved Trump rigged the election now the election was already certified and a done deal, we don't have systems for removing someone in that capacity other than impeachment. However, by that point Harris would have been President and they would have had to impeach each successor to the President until they came to a Republican who would replace him. That would have meant impeaching Harris, and then Walz, and so on. Impeachment of Walz would have been a harder job, too, since there would have been very little to tie him to Biden's act.

The best they could have done would have been making Trump speaker of the house to put him in the line of succession but the Democrats could have slowed down impeachment proceedings to a crawl as well, dragging it out for months and months and reducing the likelihood of the plan even working and leaving Trump with a job he didn't even want as speaker of the house.

However even if they made Trump speaker, his criminal cases would have had the time to wind through the courts and put him permanently behind bars, making it more difficult to keep him in his position as speaker of the house.

Anyway, the point is Democrats had every opportunity to play the same bullshit games that Republicans have played and continue to play to exert their power over government without the consent of the governed. All they had to do was do it close enough to the election that our systems of judicial checks and balances would have ruled against him after the election was over and Biden was no longer President.

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Democrat voters didn't have the stomach for even a quarter of what you just suggested and much of it relies on old people who don't really care that much falling on sharp swords for the greater good.

It also pretend that Republicans would follow the law in that case when the current problem is that they frequently don't.

More than that, I bet that Donald would win from prison if arrested. I me a dude hung his mug shot up 8j the oval office.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

Modern day James Buchanan

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

He is ultimately a republican, so a huge fan of hierarchy and hurting marginalized people.

[-] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

Buy the book hail the line that goes up. Your blood feeds the machine.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

This story once again reminds me of how chillingly close we came to dictatorship during that 2020 election. Sadly, trump's failure to cling to power then only bought us 4 years.

There were so many WIMPS, so many chances to stop him wasted by cowardice. Two impeachments where repubs protected him (they hated his power over them and had two chances to exercise their own power and get rid of him once and for all--since he wouldn't have been able to run again if they'd convicted him.

Then after the almost miraculous ousting of him, Biden and the Dems refused take action to stop him: He should have had him arrested for Jan 6 and/or other crimes - but no, Biden appointed Merrick Garland who -- speaking of the word wimp --makes Pence look like Captain America.

Dems could also have passed any of a number of laws that would have made it difficult or impossible for him to run again (they did pass a couple of useful but wimpy laws). Biden and Congress could have expanded the Supreme Court. So many opportunities to shore up our democracy, just thrown away for lack of courage to meet the moment.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago

On the other hand, the conservatives have now openly embraced fascism but the dumbest possible version of it as recession looms and a bubble grows.

What would have happened in 2028 if Harris won and the bubble popped on her guardianship of the status quo?

America is about to go hungry and everyone will know who did it.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Biden did it?

Trump can literally do no wrong in these peoples minds. You really think there is one person out there that is a die hard Trump supporter who wouldnt blame Biden or democrats?

Half of them would eat shit out of Trumps ass if it meamt libs had to smell their breath

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly. People need to understand and accept that rationality has no place in their world view and start acting accordingly instead of clinging to hope they can ever be rehabilitated through suffering from trump's policies.

The stories we see about magats being upset with him are nothing but "feel-good" copium. Sure, there may be a few cases where someone has become disillusioned with him, but those are amplified and exaggerated way out of proportion. 99% of them are still fully supportive of him and love what he's doing and they will never turn on him.

In their view, trump is divinely appointed by God to lead America to the Promised Land. It all fits with their Christian Nationalist religion, where anything good that happens is thanks to God and anything bad is because of Satan. Of course this perfectly translates to all good is from Savior Trump and all bad is from the Demon-crats!

[-] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 36 points 10 months ago

I only have one good thing to say about Pence: I don't think a wimp would have made that final decision to certify. On that one decision, he gets my respect.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

After hearing those threats, you're absolutely correct. There was a fucking gallows setup outside for him!

[-] iamacar@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Simply doing his job should not gain him respect. But that’s how low the bar is for these asshats.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Didn't he have threats on his life for doing it? I think that's respectable even if he's not a good person in other ways. We all know many people that would simply capitulate in those circumstances.

[-] iamacar@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I can see your point but to me that’s like watching goodfellas and at the end saying Henry was a good guy after all because he testified against the mob.

Pence was between a rock and a hard place and made a decision based on himself more than saving America or whatever. Looking back, I wonder if he would have tried to go along with the coup, would that have been better long term. It’s doubtful it would have worked, and maybe some real action with consequences would have come about. Now we are stuck with Trump as a dictator.

[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, it's not, because that's not what was said.

Commenter literally says "on that one decision", and you constructed a strawman as if the commenter was saying that one decision made up for his past mistakes.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

But he is a wimp. 🤷‍♂️

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 10 months ago

Yeah a non-wimp would have 25th amendmented Trump's loony ass.

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Oh right, because it only takes one person to do that right?

People couch quarterbacking but getting the basics wrong is infuriating.

This guy is trash but some of the "if I, an internet tough guy, was in his shoes, I'd [completely unrealistic if not impossible magic solution]" make me lose hope.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I think it's more the >4 years standing next to trump gazing admiringly at him raving incoherently that'll make him go down as a wimp.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 months ago

He is a wimp. Where was any of this when the fucking impeachment hearings were happening?

[-] Insekticus@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Has anyone heard from Jack Smith? Has this administration had him killed yet?

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
267 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30941 readers
3516 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS