this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
3288 points (87.4% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

3590 readers
14 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context

There have been a lot of posts and comments recently about Facebook entering the fediverse, and how different instances will handle it. Many people have asked me to commit to pre-emptively defederating from Threads before they even implement ActivityPub.

The lemm.ee federation policy states that it's not a goal for lemm.ee to curate content for our users, but we will certainly defederate any server which aims to systematically break our rules. I want to point out here that Facebook makes essentially all of its money from advertising, and lemm.ee has a no advertising rule - basically, Facebook has a built-in financial incentive to break our rules. ActivityPub has no protections against advertising, so it's likely we will end up having to eventually defederate from Threads just for this reason alone.

However, I would still like to get a feel for how many people in our instance are actually excited for potential federation with Threads. While personally I feel that any theoretical pros are by far outweighed by cons, I do want to use this opportunity to see how much of the community disagrees with me. I am not intending to run this instance as a democracy (sorry if anybody is disappointed by that), but I would still like to have a clear picture of user feedback for potentially major decisions such as this one. This is why I am asking every user who wants lemm.ee to federate with Facebook to please downvote this post.


Here are some reasons why I personally believe that Threads will have a negative effect on the fediverse

  • As mentioned above, Facebook is completely driven by ad revenue. There is nothing stopping them from sending out ads as posts/comments with artificially inflated scores, which would ensure that their ads end up on the "all" page of federated servers.
  • Threads already has more users than all Lemmy instances combined. Even if their algorithms don't apply to the rest of the fediverse directly, they can still completely dictate what the "all" page will look like for all instances by simply controlling what their own users see and vote on.
  • Moderation does not seem to be a priority for Threads so far, meaning that they would create massive moderation workloads for smaller instances.
  • In general, Facebook has shown countless times that they don't have their users best interests in mind. They view users as something to exploit for revenue. There are probably ways they are already thinking about hurting the fediverse that we can't even imagine yet.

By the way, we're not really in any rush today with our decision regarding federation

  • Threads does not have ActivityPub support yet today
  • Even if they add ActivityPub support, their UX is geared towards Mastodon-like usage - it seems unlikely that there would ever be proper interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • We don't really know what to defederate from - it's completely possible that "threads.net" will not be their ActivityPub domain at all.

So go ahead and downvote if you feel defederation would be a mistake, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! It would be super helpful to me if folks who are in favor of federating with Threads could leave a comment explaining their reasoning.


Update:

By now, it's clear that there is a group of users who are in favor of federating with Threads. The breakdown is like this (based on downvotes):

  • lemm.ee users: 136 in favor of federating with Threads
  • Others: 288 in favor of federating with Threads

While it seems to be a minority, it's still quite a few users. There is no way to please all users in this situation - any decision I make will certainly inconvenience some of you, and I apologize for that.

A big thanks to everybody who has shared opinions and arguments in comments so far. I think there are several well written comments that have been unfairly downvoted, but I have personally read all comments and tried to respond to several as well. I will keep reading them as they come in.

The main facts I am working with right now are as follows:

  • The majority of lemm.ee users are strongly opposed to immediately federating with Threads
  • Facebook has a proven track record of exploiting users (and a built-in financial incentive to do so)
  • We currently lack proper federation/moderation tools to allow us to properly handle rule breaking content from Facebook

Considering all of the above, I believe the initial approach for lemm.ee should be to defederate Threads, and then monitor the situation for a period of time to determine if federating with them in the future is a realistic option

In order to federate with them, the following conditions would need to be fulfilled:

  • There needs to be actual interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • Threads needs to prove that they are not flooding instances with rule-breaking content (mainly ads and bigotry for lemm.ee)
  • There needs to be a mechanism to prevent feed manipulation by Threads algorithms (potentially this means discarding all incoming votes from Threads)

Note: this is an initial list, subject to change as we learn more about Threads.

Again, I realize this approach won't please everybody, but I really believe it's the best approach on a whole for now. Please feel free to keep adding comments and keep the discussion going if you think there is something I have not considered.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] user_already_exists@lemm.ee 365 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Please follow lemmy.ml and stand up to the big guys and defederate in whatever form it comes. This is a chance to finally stand alone from the Mega corps and have some peace and quiet.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 76 points 1 year ago

Peace and quiet is so rare in social media these days, that is so not obvious that we somehow have it here

Exactly we're here and doing all this work on our own dime so we can have a social media site that won't turn out like every corporate social media site ever. It's already working the way we want it to without any help from Facebook, so logically giving them a seat at the table can only not help.

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preach! There’s a good opportunity here to keep this space free from the greedy hands of a bunch of rich assholes. People are so eager for there to be a ‘new twitter’ but haven’t even raised one question about whether threads has fundamentally addressed the problem that has lead to the downfall of twitter and Reddit. Meet your new boss, same as the old boss. Why the hell should we keep just hoping that some billionaire ceo will do what’s right. Even if that ceo does the right thing, they will eventually be replaced.

There can be a place on the internet free from capitalist exploitation for profit. Communities can exist solely for the sake of the community. Not every goddamn thing needs to be monetized. Send a clear message that past tactics will not fly here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burrp@burrp.xyz 205 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'm not a lemm.ee user, but I support defederation should Meta decide to permit access to Lemmy instances. We're here to escape Silicon Valley, not look for opportunities to invite them to dinner.

[–] user_already_exists@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lemm.ee is a great instance if you ever want to ride shotgun on the long road trip of the fediverse but what I love the most about this experience is exactly this....create your own server, instances, communities. We are getting an early chance to build and customize our own user experience here. The idea of keeping out what we are fighting against makes sense to me and wouldn't it be cool if @sunaurus did it early in the game like the 2nd largest instance did and beat .world to it? (if they follow suit, which I can't predict)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MortyMcFry@aussie.zone 154 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If you don’t defederate we might as well go back to reddit. I don’t want to see posts from instagram accounts

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 45 points 1 year ago

Absolutely on point. If it's deal with Facebook or deal with Reddit that doesn't have a partnership with Facebook I would go straight back to Reddit. Fuck Facebook and their rebrand attempt to distance themselves with the Meta shit.

[–] scorpiosrevenge@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

100% get that shit out of here

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 133 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

I’m excited by the potential of the fediverse, and I want the fediverse to grow. That means more users. However, the noncommercial nature of the fediverse is why I’m excited by it in the first place. I couldn’t care less if there’s yet another gigantic social network full of ads.

Allowing any profit-driven interest to influence the fediverse risks destroying what makes the fediverse interesting and special. I’m not willing to risk the fediverse in order to grow it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 109 points 1 year ago

Hell no. I came to Lemmy to get AWAY from the corporate overlords.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 91 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FoxyZac64@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Always remember.

"I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks." - Mark Zuckerberg

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michikade@lemm.ee 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering Meta mines as much data from as many people as possible just to advertise to them and also they can’t even launch Threads in the EU right now because of how aggressively it tracks literally everything about their users and Threads’ only purpose is to gather more data to sell to more people, I think that alone is worth not letting them play.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ballistic86@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Staying as far away from Meta has been my goal since leaving Facebook 8 years ago. I really like this instance, it meets all of my needs for my Reddit replacement.

I don’t see a reason to federate with a corporation unless they were able to deliver something I’m not currently getting and their corporate support would greatly improve performance/sustainability for this instance. But based on previous experience, a company entering a space usually makes it worse.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 71 points 1 year ago

I think like a lot of people the reason I'm putting up with the growing pains of a decentralized network, the fragmentation of communities that come with it, and sync issues across instances is because we want to try something that isn't run by corporations that views users as something to sell off to the highest bidder. If I wanted to deal with a centralized large user base why wouldn't I just skip this whole fediverse thing and go straight to Meta or reddit or Twitter or tiktok that is way more user friendly? I'm not here because I want another reddit clone that ends up being run or is influenced by another billionaire asshole down the line.

[–] backshift0022@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strongly in favour of defederating. Firstly because I don't want advertising or big businesses taking over feeds, but the point you made about moderation is critical. The sheer amount of content that instance admins will have to deal with will be unmanageable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kururin@talk.kururin.tech 51 points 1 year ago

Fuck facebook and fuck everything that has to do with it! Defederate!

[–] OctopusKurwa@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago (8 children)

No Federation with Corporations.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zapp@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago

You know, we've already got an app to go to deal with Zucks' social media hole. It would be nice to have a space that wasn't connected to it. Then we all get the best of both worlds.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (5 children)

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

The thing about waiting to take action until they break the rules is that by then it's too late.

Google played nice with XMPP up until they established a dependence - then they went for the jugular. Do we have any reason to believe Meta will behave any differently?

When you identify cancer, you don't wait for it to Metastasize - you cut that bitch out as early as possible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Edvin73@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

I changed my instance yesterday to a Meta defederated one. An absolute no brainer. And people who think, that you shouldn't defederate from Meta, can just install and use Threads along with all other Meta crap. Meta will never change. Lemmy is a fresh breath of air, the idea behind is great. Don't burn it.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I don't understand why anyone wants to have Facebook of all companies here. Really? Why is this even a question.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

If I see my family members‘ racist shit in the Fediverse, I return to Reddit.

So will everyone else. Federating with Meta is a one way ticket to kill any potential the Fediverse could have.

[–] untamedblade@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

I too am in favor of defederating with Threads. If Meta just wanted to create an instance of mastodon for users who are interested or something like that maybe I would have been fine. But Meta is coming in with an entire social network with millions of users. This is going to completely disrupt fediverse and current users will be forced to interact with it in some way. In time Fediverse would be completely dependent on Meta and lose it's own identity. The Fediverse needs more time to grow slowly as people realize that profit motivated social media just doesn't work and want something different. With the current decentralized model, I feel we do have plenty of time to grow and don't need meta's user base. I think it's time to define what fediverse stands for - it can't be just any entity using activitypub. You have to define some rules and guidelines if you want to be part of the community.

[–] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't believe that federating with Threads will be completely apocalyptic, and I actually believe that the commercialization of the Fediverse is the way it will take over the internet. You can't run the entire internet on a crowdfunded and volunteer-only basis, after all. The beauty of the Fediverse is that competition is easy and enshittification is difficult due to how easy it'll be to simply take your activity somewhere else, meaning that companies like Meta won't be able to do the type of things they're known for.

That being said, I believe that for technical reasons, as well as the fact that it'd be very easy for Meta to strangle their competition in the cradle if we (Referring to the Fediverse as a whole, as this isn't even my instance) cooperated with them, nobody should federate with Threads until the Fediverse is large, resilient, and technologically matured enough to survive a hostile takeover attempt by a corporation like Meta. Basically, defederate from them for now, and reconsider at a later date when the Fediverse has had time to establish itself. I think in the future, the Fediverse will be able to easily deal with Threads being popular and enshittifying itself, but I simply don't think we're there yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

Updoot from me. Fuck the zuck suck.

[–] NerfHerder@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personal feelings: If I ever want to view Meta content, I'll go to a Meta owned app. I'm enjoying this new frontier and want it to thrive as safe haven away from massive corporate sponsorship.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Surp@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Yo I didn't come here to get down with Facebook ya know what I'm saying?

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

By virtue of how the fediverse works: if I, or they, want to be on Threads, then I, or they, can go make an account there & leave lemmy out of it entirely.

Anyone saying it would be nice to interact with Facebook can just go make a Threads account. Anything else is just endangering the rest of the community for their convenience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neardeaf@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

Fuck Facebook and the horse it rode in on.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Threads, Facebook, Meta, ZucctheSucc can go pound sand.

If Lemm.ee doesn't defederate I'll need to move to anther instance or host my own. I'm not willing to feed them data to enrich the evil shits that run that company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Botree@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I'm in Lemmy.world but would like to chime in with my two cents too if you all don't mind. Just as one would approach a venomous creature—observing from a distance and acting accordingly after gathering enough data—it might be wise for instances to consider defederating from Threads right from the beginning, until further observations are made.

Regardless of how well they try to present it, we should remember that big corporations not only fail to act in our best interests but also view us as the product. Contrary to the spirit of federation, monopoly will always be their ultimate goal.

[–] _bonbon_@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

DEFEDERATE!

[–] franglais@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adibis@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No Facebook or MZuk. Please.

It's a huge mistake and would probably end in people wanting another alternative, this time to lemmy, if Facebook took it over.

Shady practices everywhere...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] focalors@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Please defederate.

[–] HowShouldIKnow@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Firstly, I am anti-Meta. If someone on lemmy/mastodon wants to use Threads and their instance blocks it then they are free to get a Threads account. Likewise if someone is using Threads and see what they feel is an incomplete experience, they are free to find a lemmy instance and sign up. Here's my question, and it's one I haven't seen anyone else ask. Is refederating possible? Difficult? If we assume the worst and are wrong have we cut off our noses to spite our faces?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remembering what Facebook did with XMPP (initially allowed their users to speak to other messengers' users, then got sloppy with compatibility, causing great workload to unrelated app developers, and finally, having accumulated enough mass for Messenger, stopped supporting XMPP) - Facebook should be avoided like fire.

Facebook is also bad for society, allowing manipulation (targeted advertizing), aggregating great amounts of user data (harming privacy) and prioritizing user engagement regardless of the social cost (a hateful conflict generates more clicks than cat photos).

[–] JeffCraig@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For real guys, we need a better way to debate, propose and vote on de-federation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Corporations ruin everything because of their profit motive. It's best to avoid them like the cancer they are.

[–] dizzy@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Please defederate.

load more comments
view more: next ›