278
submitted 9 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

A Washington judge said images taken by Flock cameras are "not exempt from disclosure" in public record requests.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 74 points 9 months ago

Can't wait for the group that leverages this for some chaotic good. Reconstruct movements of political figures? Track squad cars for a real-time map of what areas are safest for crime? Really flip the surveillance state around and see how it feels to be in the other end of the camera.

[-] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 30 points 9 months ago

FOA requests are no where near real time and also cost $ to request. They are also not automated. Real government employees will be assigned your request to approve/deny, determine cost, request and receive payment, and then fulfill. This usually takes months or years.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

That may be true, but Washington has the Public Records Act which says they have to respond in 5 days and can't take longer than a year to provide the documents, and have fines large enough for some people to make a living setting people up for public records lawsuits.

So in Washington, at least, there actually is some accountability.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

At which point it will be national-securitied into knowing they exist getting you a free rope.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

So now we need home addresses for all of Flock's c-suite so we can host a website showing their lives on Flock cameras.

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago

I hope this becomes real. We can have our own Truman show, until they change the laws.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
278 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

5091 readers
120 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS