Film crews became 'collateral damage' of Hollywood strikes (www.reuters.com)

submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They were among the hundreds of thousands of U.S. and Canadian film and television crew workers who were unemployed for up to 10 months because of strikes called by actors and writers, leaving a trail of evictions and family disintegration.

Crew members rallied to help one another and charities pitched in during the writers strike that began May 2 and ended in late September, and the actors strike that started in July. The actors reached a tentative agreement on Wednesday.

"The actors and writers are getting a lot of publicity but the crews are the collateral damage of the strikes," said Lori Rubinstein, executive director of mental health charity Behind the Scenes.

Crew members lost health insurance and broke into retirement funds. They saw relationships collapse and became isolated and depressed as, month after month, they went without pay and lost the rush of 70-hour work weeks creating shows that cost hundreds of millions of dollars, according to union leaders, counselors and over a dozen crew members Reuters interviewed.

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago

Strikes are caused by management. If the studios bargained in good faith there would be no strike. The studios could have agreed to the workers demands during initial negotiations, but instead they chose to put people out by dragging their feet for 10 months.

Every strike can be averted by bargaining in good faith, and making reasonable concessions in a timely fashion.

[-] MMNT@lemmy.ml 63 points 2 years ago

They're not collateral damage of the strikers, they're collateral of the same executives that dragged their assets thinking they would win.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

The article was written by Andrew Hay, a Reuters journalist and a likely NewsGuild member. It's a legitimate question as to why he chose to frame the issue as the fault of strikers and not their intransigent bosses.

The quote is from Lori Rubenstein, executive director of a charity for film crew mental health support. It's a legitimate question as to why she believes that the people her charity serves don't have the unqualified right to seek better treatment at work by striking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

Sounds like they need a stronger union.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

The Directors Guild of America wasn't on strike.

Neither was the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

Maybe they should have been, in solidarity. And use their strike funds to pay bills.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

And yet these unions aren't going to blame strikers for the strike. Framing it as collateral damage from the strike as Reuters has chosen to do is explicit union busting.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Okay? I'm not sure what that has to do with what I said.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago

Because Joe Bufalino, a first assistant director who committed suicide, was in the Directors Guild of America.

And the unhoused Toronto production assistant who was taken in by location manager are both in the International Alliance of Stage and Theatrical Employees.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

How is that the fault of the strikers?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

I never said it was.

You said "they" needed a stronger union, and I took that as you referencing the crew members who were affected but not part of the SAG-AFTRA union.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Gee maybe they shouldn't be siloed off in their own unions when they all work in the same workplace.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago

Oh look the studios are trying to make the actors and writers into the bad guys again.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The crews often are. I don't understand why they don't have a union with reciprocal support agreements. I rememeber during the last strike the late night shows made agreements with the WGA so that they could bring their shows back if they performed no written material. That way the rest of the crews could get paid (and the actors weren't on strike so there was stuff to promote). It was either Colbert or Conan that literally filled time by spinning their wedding ring on their desk, just because they could pay people to film it.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Conan. It was very stupid and very funny.

[-] LemmySoloHer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Conan handled the writers strike and this very issue so magnificently. We got Jordan Schlansky because of lack of content during the strike and he continued to pay idled employees personally out of his own pocket so that no one would lose a paycheck and no one felt pressured to "scab" to survive. A comedic master and a class act.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023

46 points (73.5% liked)

News

39551 readers

2916 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world