252
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

As the Times noted, he said that “he regretted not ordering the National Guard to seize voting machines in swing states after his loss in the 2020 election.”


As the Times observed, “Mr. Trump’s expression of regret … was ... a warning sign that he had not given up on the idea that voting machines were dangerous or that they could be seized in an effort to curb fraud.” We should take that warning seriously.

So far, the leaders of the Democratic party have not. They have focused on mobilizing to compete successfully in November, but have done little to ensure the election is not rigged through executive action, intimidation, or interference with vote counting.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

The primary comes first, and it's the first time we'll have fair primaries in decades....

But you never give up on plan A till plan A fails, that doesn't mean it's the only plan.

Oligarchs are desperate for Americans to hand over freedom in the hopes of security, they want us to pre-emptively coalesce around a neoliberal and focus on how they're not as bad as trump.

The most important step to beating trump, is getting a charismatic candidate with popular policy to the general.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The most important step is beating fascism, which includes Democrats and Republicans. Our current conditions did not rise in a vacuum, fascism cannot become a dominant force without the complicity of a weak liberal party. Only focusing on Trump, who is a single cog in the machine, will result in nothing changing. Liberals are focused on the emperor when they should be focusing on the Empire.

The current US primary system is the furthest from actual democracy and fair votes that you can get. There's no reason why all primaries couldn't all happen on one day like the general election. They stagger primaries so they can manufacture your consent for the candidate that they want in office

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The Democratic primaries need to be an absolute bloodbath this year. Unfortunately Schumer is with us until 2028, so we'll probably mostly be dead or he will by then.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 months ago

He could be fired as leader though. Make that a campaign issue for any Senate race.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Could doesn't really apply to good things in politics, but I appreciate your optimism. He will in all likelihood step down peacefully if he's not gunned down first. Maybe a massive progressive wave could change that, but I think it'd be a big ask even if that happened this year. It'd have to be multiple elections worth of progressive waves I think. Given the growing special interests in democratic primaries, I think the real fight is going to be out front in most of these cases.

[-] 1orangecat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago

It's by design, the current corporate Democrats have to show some effort of resistance but is rigged to lose in the end.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

Exactly. You have to give the people just enough hope to think things might change but without actually doing anything. The Democrats are very good at it. They've been doing it for a long time.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 8 points 7 months ago

They’re campaigning like the fascists are going to follow the rules. They won’t, they aren't, and they never have. Take the fucking gloves off and stop pretending like anything less than forcibly removing them and putting them in a jail cell for the rest of their lives is going to do much of anything.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

When you face the reality that they are part of that fascism things become much more clear as to what path to take

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Democrat leadership doesn't care if they win or lose elections. They'll all be rich and comfortable regardless. So they drag their feet and pretend to be the opposition party but in reality they are in a limbo contest with their friends on the other side of the isle.

This isn't about a purity test. It's about putting the right person in charge. Hakeem Jeffries and Schumer don't care about your issues. They will always side with capital when rubber meets the profits.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago

Democrats are campaigning as if the 2026 election will be ~~fair~~. That's a mistake.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Even Russia has "elections."

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Democrats are campaigning as if we don't remember that they are shit

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
252 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31035 readers
23 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS