43
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Dust0741@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Severity 9.1 - Authenticated user container escape.

The latest release fixes this.

See details here

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 months ago

This is why you don't expose services to the Internet, especially with weak or no authentication.

[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago

I'm not sure why anyone would want to expose Frigate of all things to the open internet.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago

So they could view their cameras while they're away?

[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 12 points 8 months ago

That's my use case. But my frigate-box is strictly behind firewall and I access it over wireguard when I'm away.

[-] lankydryness@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I second this. I have notifications set up via homeassistant, and if I want to view a feed I just VPN in

[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

There are far better, more secure ways to do this. You could use a reverse proxy. You could use tailscale. You could use wireguard.

The last thing you should do is open Frigate's port to the net.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Just answering the question you asked.

[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I know, but it seemed like there was confusion about my intended point, which is that you should never expose it to the open internet. It wasn't a question I really intended to be answered since I know that was their intention. My confusion is why do that when there are secure alternatives, some of which are easier than opening a port.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

Inexperience or lack of effort. I don't know any method easier than just opening the port.

[-] xyro@morbier.foo 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"This vulnerability is only exploitable by an administrator or users who have exposed their Frigate install to the open internet with no authentication which allows anyone full administrative control." High, but not critical

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62971 readers
889 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS