Asklemmy

I do prefer reading physical books, but I almost exclusively read on my ereader because of easy availability of whatever I want, and it doesn't take up tons of space like books do.

Compared to my kindle, I hate real books. No worries about lighting. Page always flat. Lighter. Never lose what page you're on. Less space and hundreds of books can be kept right there. Still looks like real paper. Font and size to your own preference.

There's really no downside at all for me. I never cared how a book "smelled". That's for sure.

If you have an ereader with an eink screen... it's a no-brainer. Digital books are soooo good.

• virtually no weight
• virtually no space
• waaaaay cheaper
• your local library has probably a way bigger and more accessible catalogue of ebooks than physical ones
• tap and hold a word and get an automatic definition/translation
• adjust text size or font
• dark mode, if you into that (in some models)
• Text-to-speech (in some models)
• highlight text and write notes without f-ing up pages
• literally translate entire phrases or look particular information from Wikipedia or similar with a simple gesture.
• backup all of those and do crazy stuff like an automatic daily email to yourself with cool notes you took months/years ago.

Physical books nowadays are like vynil music... it's for the artwork and having a physical "certificate" of something you love. Like... if I discover a book I really enjoy, I'll probably buy a physical version so I can, you know, have it there on the shelf, like you have family pics or something.

Depends. Digital is usually best for me since I can read on my phone pretty much anytime anywhere.

That said, some books feel like they work best in your hand, like The Book of Disquiet, which has so many notes at the end and I haven't found a comfortable enough way to skip back on forth without having to scroll through a lot to get to where I was, or House of Leaves, which is more like a fun hands-on puzzle to play with.

• The <1% of books I love: physical
• The >99% of everything else: digital

I think e-ink readers are incredible. My eyes feel like they're reading a normal book, but it's got a backlight, doesn't take up a bunch of physical space I don't have, and it's a lot easier to read using only one hand at a time (even turning pages).

I think I overall prefer digital, but on e-ink devices mostly.

I like that they don't take up space, I can download them quickly and not have to go to the bookstore or order it online and wait for it to be delivered. Also I can sync it on multiple devices and read on my kindle when I really want to have a good reading experience but if I forget it or am waiting for the bus or something, just pull up the kindle app on my phone and everything is synced.

On the other hand, growing up with a lot of books I kinda miss the feel and smell of physical books. Also I feel like they are a bit more... "permanent".

I used to prefer physical, because I read on my phone and never really paid attention. Used my phone to read for a year and read a ton of books but don't remember any of them. Couple years ago I bought a kindle and ever since I haven't bought a single physical book, opting to buy them instead through amazon.

Don't think I'll ever go back to physical, honestly, it's just too convenient. Digital is less bulky, not just in storage but in my hands, pages don't wear down from turning, and I can fit my kindle in my front pockets and read anywhere, any time.

I dislike having to give money to amazon though.

I prefer physical. But my shelves were full and the wood groaning. I use a kindle these days.

Digital, no contest.

I'm an old guy and I've been buying and reading books for most of my life. I own thousands of them, filling up shelves and stacked on tables and cluttering everything, and that's even with the bulk of them in boxes in my garage. I love them and I love being surrounded by them, but they're a chore and a burden.

And I have a collection of almost as many ebooks, all in a few GB on a tablet.

So ebooks win on space and convenience.

As far as the actual process of reading goes, they're pretty close to the same, but ebooks have a bit of an edge. I have no issues with a screen, so words on a screen or words on paper are pretty much the same. Physical pages though are bound along one edge and flexible and generally at least subtly curved, while a screen is perfectly flat and evenly lit. Also, on a physical page, I'm stuck with whatever typeface is there, while with an ebook, I can scale it to whatever I want or even change the font or colors or whatever. so ebooks win there too.

And while I'm reading an ebook, I can search the text for any term or character name or phrase, so I can refresh myself on things or find a particular passage or whatever without laboriously thumbing through the pages, and I can switch over to a browser anytime to get background for anything or just look up a word.

And when I finish or drop an ebook, I can just tap the back arrow to go to my shelf, or switch over to an app or browser and go online, and find another one.

So... yeah. I really don't think there's one single thing that physical books do better than ebooks, other than serving as decoration - filling space on shelves.

you can get ebooks for free without a library

I reluctantly started reading ebooks years ago for a very practical reason: owning some few thousand physical books, I pretty much ran out of room in the shelves in my small apartment. So nowadays I only buy physical art books and the like. Having said this, I actually easily grew to like ebooks, for their ubiquitous availability and, of course, not taking up precious shelf space.

Have to read them in an ereader for a proper experience, though. Tablet/smartphone displays tire my eyes a lot if I read for any meaningful period of time.

Both. I prefer digital generally because I'm a digital hoarder and I love seeing my Calibre library get bigger and carrying my Kobo around, but there's something satisfying about seeing my bookmark make steady progress through a physical book (slowly; I'm a slow reader).

Digital. I love physical books, but I never read them. Digital is so much easier for me to actually sit down and read, and I love building up my library.

Do you prefer digital or physical books?

Digital. I live in 76ft^2^ and can no longer store thousands of physical books like I did in a "sticks and bricks" house. But there are ~13,000 easily stored between the e-ink kindle and waiting in the wings in calibre.

Reading is a big part of my retirement plan.

Digital, but specifically on an e-ink device. I can't stand trying to read an ebook on an LCD/LED display

It's much nicer to read from physical ones, but i reality I end up borrowing digital copies or audiobooks. I travel often and real books take space, too much I'm afraid.

Personally, I prefer physical books, especially if it's a book that I really like. There's just something about physically having the book and knowing that you won't lose access to it unless something happens to the book. That being said most of my reading these days is digital simply due to the fact that I don't have the space for all the books I want. Ebooks are just too convenient when it comes to saving space. Still, if it's a book that I think I am going to keep coming back to then I would probably get a physical copy.

Definitely prefer a real book, of course a ton of convenience to be gained by the various ebook readers. One thing I'll say I have a very hard preference for though is at least an e-ink screen when reading on a digital device. Spend enough time on backlit screens, way nicer when I can't have a physical book to have e-ink and regular lighting.

I prefer to own the physical, and make a DRM-free digital copy for myself. Best of both worlds: I own a physical copy they cannot revoke and that I can transcode again if needed, and I can carry a digital copy that I can watch anywhere on my own terms.

Physical without a doubt

I've really wanted to like digital but it just feels lacking to me. I buy pretty much exclusively used and love buying the oldest print of a book I'm looking for. The feel and smell of the paper, the difference in typeface, line spacing and page size between books, the artwork, all the things are important to me I guess. Bonus points if someone left notes or highlighter marks or old library stamps. It's more than just words to read for me.

Plus I like seeing them on the shelf, like little badges of accomplishment for making it through the book, or encouragement to read it if I haven't already.

Physical because its better for reading. But limited space at my home mean I am most buying digital nowadays.

I used to be always for physical books. Then in 2018 I ran out of space in my bookcase and shifted to reading on my phone. Now I am so used to it I can't read physical books anymore... especially since a lot of books I read sometimes are doorstoppers and my phone is definitely smaller and lighter than any physical book I may read.

I almost always start digital, either ebook or audiobook then buy a physical copy later if I liked it. It's just a lot less friction for starting something new, no needing to go out of my way to a library/bookstore or wait for something to be delivered. Sometimes I'll just take a gamble on something physical if I'm looking for a new travel book or I'm killing time in a library/bookstore though.

Physical. I read a lot and a real book won't run out of battery.

I strongly dislike reading from a tablet but I've been meaning to buy a Kindle for some time. Unfortunately they are still ridiculously high priced in my country, so I haven't bit the bullet yet.

digital because pirate

Physical. You do not really own your digital book and you have to depend on a devise that can break/need charging to read.

Digital, nearest bookstore that sells legitimate copy is around 200 km from my hometown.

If it’s just text (paperback novels), digital. If it has some illustrations, or is a comic or an art book, physical. Same for technical books with diagrams: physical. I don’t have an iPad or a large ebook to appreciate graphic content in the same way as in a physical book. I have no problems reading novels off my phone, on the other hand.

@JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee @asklemmy@lemmy.ml Physical Books. Love the tactile experience and visual representation of % complete. No issues with digital sometimes more practical when lending from the library. Not keen on buying ebooks.

I prefer digital books. Not only can I have an entire library in my hands the books are also cheaper making them easier to buy.

Now that I have a Kindle, digital all the way. It's so nice to just throw that tiny thing in a bag and read somewhere, and if you finish your book there are a bunch more on your device. I like that the Kindles allow you to email ebooks to your address to be downloaded so you're not locked into the Amazon store.

Not for every kind of book, I'd say but digital... 8.5 times out of 10. E-ink screens are amazing and just as good as paper, but having your books also available on your phone, and thus always in your pocket, is transformative. So, digital on a platform that syncs between devices.

Physical. I love the smell of paper.

I do occasionally use a Kobo, which is a very convenient little device. However, I prefer a paper book.

I really don't see the appeal of paperbooks anymore. Ebooks are infintly more practical. Lightweight and easily fillable with endless content. Why would I ever want to lug around a single novel when I can just slide my entire library in my purse?

Digital because you can alternate between stuff.

Digital - easier to carry and to handle while reading. Plus u can read on a phone/laptop in dark environments as well. However for reading on a plane, where I'm sitting in one place, I somehow prefer physical books as they're less painful than looking at a lit up screen for extended periods of time.

Physical. The whole feel of it and for old books the smell. Can't beat it. But I still read most books on my phone or a Kindle.

Digital for sure. Who has room for physical books? The physical books that I've somehow gathered over the years are the worst items I have in terms of volume (or mass) relative to their utility.