Melania Trump is a scowling void of pure nothingness ~~in her ghastly film – review~~
Guys, I'm being totally genuine when I say that this description truly is spot on.
That is Melania. That's her. This is how she is objectively described.
It's either a bribe or a money laundring sceme. It's the only thing that makes sense.
It’s a bribe, go look at how much the movie paid to her. It was like half of the overall movie budget.
About 70% of the budget.
Budget $40 mil and she got paid $29mil. Definitely a real movie
Who is your favourite musician, Ratner (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing) asks Melania. She responds with “Michael Jackson” (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing), detailing how she met the late singer with her husband (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing). Perhaps this is Ratner’s vision for a modern American: a country of forgiveness.
Lmao this writing is pure gold
You can tell they were having fun with this review
The “film” is part propaganda, sure, and part sop to Big Tech companies who require constant regulatory approval for financial manoeuvrings. Even then, it is bad. It will exist as a striking artefact – like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will – of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly. Organising plans for his return to the White House at 2am, after the Starlight Ball, Trump announces he will immediately “begin straightening out the nation”. “We’re all very grateful,” his event producer whimpers sycophantically. It is a visceral moment where audiences, around the world, will begin to taste the boot that the American establishment so blithely licks.
At least The Birth of a Nation and Riefenstahl's films had an impact on filmmaking. No one's going to cite Melania as inspiring anything other than suicidal thoughts while being forced to watch it
“No matter where [people] come from,” Melania announces during one of her grating voiceovers, “we are bound by the same humanity.”
Does she know what her husband is doing to immigrants?
She does. Remember when she went to visit children in cages wearing this? 
Fuuuuuuck this bitch
When your entire life is based on gold digging, you aren't going to have a lot else going on upstairs.
Her claim to fame is being the first first lady whose pussy you can see on the internet.
As the Sopranos like to say...

I think they should hand out a They Live kit with this movie....

I do not understand how it did 7 million in the opening weekend.
Money. Laundering.

Isn't that not very much for a debut these days? What did endgame do?
Brb.
Edit: I'm back. It did 1.2 billion in 5 days
Your comparing a movie with a budget of $356 million to a documentary.
I am not a mathematician but...doesn't that mean:
- Avengers made ~$3.2 per $1 spent making it.
- Melania made ~$0.17 per $1 spent making it.
Sure, but it was a documentary with a budget of 75m, so it should at least get a fraction, right?
I mean. There's still a lot of people out there who'd love to show Daddy Trump their ass.
But those people don't have the attention span to see a WHOLE movie in a dark room without a phone
I'm assuming these are numbers like the Regnery Press has for their books.
People writing reviews for newspapers/movie websites, and people who enjoy really bad movies
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News