65
submitted 6 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/energy@slrpnk.net

world’s first 100 MWh-class battery energy storage facility using 628 Ah ultra-large battery cells has entered operation.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago
[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I hate how battery systems are rated. They never give the full picture. "This is a MW system" cool, but how much storage?

[-] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago

It's in MWh, what more do you want?

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Many articles leave that out. The headline for instance only lists Ah

[-] hanrahan@piefed.social 0 points 6 months ago

But isn't AHr a better measure for battery storage ?

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

No, you're still missing voltage to give you the total energy storage, or Watt-hour (wh). For a cell of known chemistry, the voltage is implied. For example, lithium ion's nominal voltage is ~3.7V. However, the term "battery" is ambiguous. Could be one cell, could be many strapped together to form your "battery". See 12V lead acid batteries. Therefore, Ah is only half the answer.

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I really want to be impressed and am sure I will be. Just give me the specs

[-] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago

v*a=w

so ? * 628 = 1,000,000

you do the math part, I'm lazy

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Me too, that's why I want it in the article.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ah is not a good unit for explaining capacity, it's better to use Joules. Ah is better suited to throughput because it informs the maximal load that can be applied.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

Agreed Ah are bad.

MWh are equivalent to J. Specifically 1MWh is 3.6GJ

[-] BambiDiego@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Those look like Retro Encabulators

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Big cells aren't necessarily good... if something goes wrong that's a lot of energy being impacted. If a cell goes bad, that's a more expensive repair. I'm sure there's other issues as well.

It can save on initial costs though in various ways as well.

There's going to be some equilibrium where size, cost, safety all converge

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
65 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

4557 readers
159 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS