3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Was recently banned from a whole bunch of DB0 communities for, as best as I can gather, downvoting once when I viewed by All (potentially accidentally while scrolling).

Important notes:

  1. I don't use scripts.
  2. I don't mass-downvote Communities. If I see a post I generally don't like when browsing All, I may downvote one post, block the Community and move on.
  3. Some of the communities I was banned from don't have any posts in them so I wouldn't have been able to downvote anything.
  4. Of all of these Communities, in my history I downvoted one post in one of them. Voting in this manner is not vote manipulation. It's quite literally a feature of the platform and as a mod of another Community, I would consider it pretty good etiquette.
  5. One of my bans reads "Appeal Granted, not a brigading member" but I'm still banned.
  6. I don't troll.

WTF is going on here?

EDIT - Updated Info from the conversation below: In the initial image, you can see two "ban waves."

The 10 bans three months ago stem from a single downvote in one Community. It was @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com See here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/34853477

I was called out by name for a single downvote and culled from a score of Communities I did not participate in by them.

The other bans from two months ago are from four total downvotes over a 10-month timeframe in one Community.

I have also stated in this thread that I don't have issues with AI-gen images, but there are shoddy ones and well-done ones.

EDIT 2: Now unbanned from the ten Communities listed as "3 months ago" in my initial image, but have been banned from three more because of this thread with the reason given being "self-proclaimed anti-AI brigader" which are two things I didn't claim to be. God dammit Lemmy...

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 year ago

the whole "if you don't like the content, don't downvote, but just ignore / block it" is really cringe

[-] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Where do yall get this ban notification stuff do you pay for some kind of lemmy Bloomberg terminal or?

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If on the web (not a mobile client), you can click the three dots with the arrow pointing down under any post (including yours) and hit "NAME Moderation History". It'll show you what mod actions have been taken on you.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks, I didn't know about that

[-] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I'm a moderator on !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, where you've never upvoted once, but you have downvoted multiple posts over months instead of blocking the community. This down-ranks submissions, adversely affecting the visibility of the community for subscribers, which is why you were banned.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/28218497

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/35031819

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/38704142

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/44766239

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't understand the thought process here. Like many, I don't browse Communities individually, I browse /All and sort by New.

So I am required to see something I like and upvote or else I am not allowed to an express an opinion in the community (or any tangentially linked community)?

If I see something I don't like (which is what the voting system is for), I should go to the Community it's posted in and make sure to upvote things before I downvote? That's the expected order of operations?

If not... what if, while browsing /All /New nothing randomly appears that the viewer likes enough to upvote? Is that then somehow the fault of the viewer and they should then be banned?

Am I interpreting your rulings correctly? 4 downvotes in the span of 10 months (judging by the times on those posts you listed) is a bannable offence? Seems rather heavy-handed to me.

If I see something I don’t like (which is what the voting system is for), I should go to the Community it’s posted in and make sure to upvote things before I downvote? That’s the expected order of operations?

If the community is about something you dislike (which seems to be the case here), why would you not just block them from your feed instead of downvoting?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe I'm indifferent to the majority of the content they spew but there is one really shitty post that I down vote that isn't worth blocking the feed over.

Keep in mind that the pattern that resulted in the OP being banned from over a dozen communities was down voting a single post. That would be triggered if the one post they down voted was literal spam or racist or sexist or any other terrible subject.

Or someone accidentally clicks on the down vote button with their fat thumb unintentionally. The mod assumes malicious intent and overreacts.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I wonder if the "overreaction" was caused by the constant harassment from anti genAI trolls? You helped create this situation, the mods are simply trying to deal with it. Sometimes that's unfortunately going to result in erroneous bans, which can usually be resolved by DMing the mod.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have yet to see an example of any individual post getting more than a handful of downvotes, which is completely expected to happen when hundreds or thousands of users have the opportunity to come across the content. That isn't harassment, and neither is people vocalizing their dislike of AI in comments.

If people are being harassed, then there should be moderation records, right? Are there dozens of people harassing people who like AI, or is the 'constant harassment' just disagreement that has been blown out of proportion by people who run communities that don't get the attention they think they deserve?

My one vote per post or comment is jot part of any problem. That is how voting works. I don't coordinate with anyone else, it is just me using a feature that exists the way I want to.

[-] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

You don't have to like anything, but consistent downvoting like this without any other kind of participation is indistinguishable from targeted downvote harassment, and isn't consistent with your claims of blocking.

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's perfectly distinguishable unless you're trying real hard to misinterpret what I said. As a Mod of a small Community myself, here's the difference in downvotes:

  1. Bad Faith Actor: Sees a post or a whole Community they don't like. Goes in and systematically downvotes a bunch of stuff on purpose. Topics, responses... everything. Downvotes because they hate the community and everything it stands for. See 50 downvotes in your Community in one day? That's these fuckers. Ban them. They are assholes and are vote manipulating. Probably ban them from related Communities for vote manipulation.

  2. Normal User: (--> We are here) May or may not comment in YOUR Community, especially if it's image-based. Sees a single post that they don't like out of thousands they see daily and downvotes it. Several months later, it may happen again. This is expected behaviour and is how an upvote / downvote system functions. Don't ban these or you're the asshole.

  3. Brigade Users: A coordinated attack to downvote or spam a Community stemming from some other place. They downvote everything and often post garbage. Ban these people. They are assholes and are vote manipulating. Probably ban them from related Communities for vote manipulation if not trying to seek an instance ban.

  4. Lurker: (The overwhelming majority of users are this) Indistinguishable from a Normal user in votes, but may not comment. May be an alt or bot account. Be wary. Check their post history to see if they're real people. If real, leave 'em alone. If empty, use your discretion. Don't ban from related Communities.

  5. Other: Downvotes accidentally when scrolling sometimes. These happen. May appear as a Lurker or a Normal User. Don't ban these or you're the asshole.

Hope that helps!

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you sharing such a bonkers policy so plainly and candidly, but that makes it no less bonkers.

[-] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Stop doing your stupid policy because it is stupid.

Doing widespread bans and accusing people of 'Vote Manipulation' just because they down voted without joining or making a comment is making a mockery of the moderation process. Like maybe a few of the people you banned were doing that, but the vast majority were probably just served up the same post in All around the same time and decided it was slop and down voted it.

I mean how many people do you really think are actually manipulating votes and don't just happen to share the same opinion that a post was crappy.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Why do those people care of they are banned from "Ai slop" comms then ?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they weren't putting accusations of vote manipulation and other ridiculous claims in the modlog it wouldn't be nearly as annoying.

It also adds some annoying steps to the end user who would want to block those communities since banning means you can't just click on the post and block the community in the default browser interface. Once banned it is necessary to go to setting and block the community manually.

Since they made a bunch of tiny, barely used communities it also means that they trickle into the feed and you have to block each one individually. They are spamming AI communities and then being dicks about it.

Then there is at least one that expands this to other communities they mod that don't have anything to do with AI. I like the Dem TankieJerk, but got banned for not liking AI. Not harassing, just down voting one or two AI slop posts in some other community and not feeling bad about it.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

At the end of the day it's up to community mods how they want to moderate their communities. If they don't want someone with a moderation history like yours in their communities then I can totally understand that. It's not like db0 is the only instance where you've been banned for systematic down voting, now is it matey?

[-] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Db0ero is explicitely pro AI

I would guess the Mod has gone full shizo and banned you from the whole instance and everywhere he could because you downvoted an AI generated image.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Don't use ableist language in a community where both of the mods are neurodiverse.

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't make it a habit of downvoting images simply because they're AI-gen, but there are well-done ones and horrible ones just like any images. Do they really ban for simply downvoting ANY AI image? That's... kind of a lot.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

They shouldn't be. I've messaged the two mods and asked them to respond, because I don't know the details.

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We found the answer (kinda)! It was @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com See here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/34853477

I was called out by name for a single downvote and culled from a score of Communities I did not participate in by them.

"Create more slop" is, in fact, a message I disagree with rather strongly and did downvote that (and only that) post. I PM'd the the mod in response to that post:

Brigading is organized. I, a single person, downvoted one post I saw in /All because it is actively content with a message I do not care for or agree with. Bad form would be going through everything in the community and downvoting. I didn’t do that either. What I had done is called “using the platform as intended.” And you overreacted with a ban.

So we've effectively solved the first part, but not the three Stable Diffusion parts... Those also seem to line up with another single downvote a month later. Again, hardly brigading or vote manipulation.

EDIT: Huh. Looks like we had someone in this thread downvoting nearly every post in here.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

EDIT: Huh. Looks like we had someone in this thread downvoting nearly every post in here.

if it is draconic who's downvoting that would be a hilarious lack of self reflection. Is there any way to check?

[-] blackjam_alex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then you check some of those communities and there's like less than 10 posts in them.

There's more banned people than content.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

If they are such tiny communities then the question is why do so many trolls go out of their way to find them, downvote everything, and harass/bully the mods? Not saying that was the case in this instance, but it's been an ongoing problem, which is why the mods are a bit twitchy I guess.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1870 readers
77 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS